Edge Level 3 - On 90 Octane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #1  
ieee_raider's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Reno, TX
Edge Level 3 - On 90 Octane?

Alright, bear with me on this... So with level 3, it requires 91 octane... what would be the result if you were to run level 3 on 90 octane, or even 89, with the timing retarded a bit?

Would you still see some performance improvements or should I just run it at level 2 with lower octane fuel?

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #2  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Yes, I think you will still see gains over level 2, just not as much as you would with higher octane and bumped timing.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #3  
ieee_raider's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Reno, TX
*bump* anyone else?
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #4  
sysman_rick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Lexington,SC
Post

I would research this Verryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy carefully. You don't want detonation or any undue stresses on valves or pistons.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #5  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Hi.

My take on this...

The timing function - that's a global spark adder, right? Adds / removes advance irrespective of rpm or load?

If that's the case, then 'sysman_rick' is probably right. There are operating parameters where the engine can tolerate either more or less timing depending upon the load, temperature, and a host of other variables.

Soooo... if a tune is by default set for a recommended octane minimum ( 91), reducing timing may not completely address the continuously variable min octane requirements of the engine during operation.

Further, if you incurred some detonation during said operation, the knock sensing system will just pull out more timing anyway, which will hurt performance even more.

Bottom line - the control you have is far from granular enough.

I'd stick to the recommendation.

Make any sense?

IMHO only, folks.... okay?

Cheers
Bubba
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #6  
ieee_raider's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Reno, TX
Thanks for the advice guys. That's kind of what I was thinking, but I'm no expert so I thought I'd throw it out there.

The reason I was wondering is that I'm about to take a trip and won't need huge performance, but the shifting characteristics of the level 3 would be nice. I'd rather not pay for premium fuel, though... lol
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #7  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by ieee_raider
Thanks for the advice guys. That's kind of what I was thinking, but I'm no expert so I thought I'd throw it out there.

The reason I was wondering is that I'm about to take a trip and won't need huge performance, but the shifting characteristics of the level 3 would be nice. I'd rather not pay for premium fuel, though... lol
Have you ever compared your gas mileage running 2 with that of 3?
I get about 11% better on 3 and that more than pays for the extra cost of premium.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 16, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #8  
ieee_raider's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Reno, TX
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
Have you ever compared your gas mileage running 2 with that of 3?
I get about 11% better on 3 and that more than pays for the extra cost of premium.
With my normal driving conditions, I didn't really notice much difference. I'm usually 50/50 city/hwy. When I get more hwy, I see a bigger difference (up to 18/19 AMPG.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.