Can anyone explain this whole PCM 'learning' stuff?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #1  
dzervit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Can anyone explain this whole PCM 'learning' stuff?

Ok... I've been driving around with the 1714 91+ Tune installed for many months now. I've noticed I can't bust the rear tires loose anymore, and my MPGs have been slowly increasing to an all-time high of 15.7mpg this last tank. I had set the tune to use the stock shift pressure for nice daily driving easy shifting.

Fast forward to the weekend. Got a cool little G-timer from Escort. Did some 0-60 times, best was 8.75 (BTW, it's a 04' 5.4L 4x4 Lariat Screw). I think this isn't too shabby... but yet not great either. I figured I was in the low to mid 8s. I figured I'd re-tune and up the shift pressure a tad. Plus I was really wondering how much the PCM learning crap had effected the performance. So with a fresh tune I set out for a little drive and another 0-60 run. My best time this time was a 9.3... the time for a bone-stock truck. On the flip side, I am once again able to bust my tires loose at will... WTF?!

So as the PCM 'learns', it takes away my snap off the line and gives me more MPG and HP along the way... at least that's all I can conclude. I want both. How the hell do you 'teach' these trucks?! Can it be done? Can the trucks be tuned to JUST FRIGGIN' perform and NOT LEARN anything? Stupid computers...
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 07:24 AM
  #2  
gobra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
No doubt! Iwould like to know what the commanded A/f ratio is and how the computer adapts to it. After removing my muffler, my tip has turned black. I used to have a EEC-IV book about how that whole system worked and it was a big help.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #3  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
As far as tinkering with the shift firmness supposedly the Superchips settings are the best with the exception of one change Mike recommends to the 2*3 shift

Do a narrow search on “adaptive strategy” Mike has mega info already posted; here’s some

Originally Posted by Superchips_Distributor

Adaptive strategy can reduce power with conservative driving, but not by a lot - so just drive the vehicle normally. This is why some guys, when they take their daily driver to the drag strip, will disconnect the battery for a few minutes to "clear" out the PCM & adaptive strategy adjustments, as they will sometimes pick up a couple of tenths of ET that way - but the same thing will happen just by making a few full-throttle runs. It comes back as quickly as it goes away, and we're only talking about a few percent power-wise, so it's not a big deal - nothing to worry about.

the "power is going to be there" no matter how you drive the vehicle, but it may be say, 97% instead of 100% if it's driven gently most of the time - that comes right back with a few full-throttle bursts over a couple of drive cycles, so it's really nothing to be concerned about.
Hope this helps D
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
rj28racer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: CA
how long is a drive cycle, please discribe
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #5  
dzervit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by jpdadeo
As far as tinkering with the shift firmness supposedly the Superchips settings are the best with the exception of one change Mike recommends to the 2*3 shift
The superchips settings blew chunks. WAY to harsh, even with moderate acceleration. Plus after it 'learned' a little it just got dumber... no way it's behavior was conducive to a long transmission life.

Off to use the search button to attempt to reveal more secrets...

.... and alrighty then... found this snippet from earlier in the year..

In some vehicles, you don't seem to get any "relearn symptoms" that are noticeable to the driver at all - while in other vehicles, the relearn seems more obvious - there is certainly a fair amount of variance there. One thing that is ALWAYS in effect is the fact that if you change tunes at the drag strip, for example, it will take oh, anywhere form 4 to maybe a half-dozen or more repeated passes down the 1/4 mile to get the full 100% performance difference between the two different tunes each time you change programs - whether you're reflashing the PCM or using a multi-program chip and just turning the **** to effect an instant program change. So yes, that does generally affect absolute *peak* power and WOT performance. But whether you will actually *notice* anything in terms of general seat-of-the-pants response or symptom-wise (like a bit of fluctuation in idle speed & quality, or in auto tranny shift firmness etc.), really varies from one vehicle to the next, even with 2 vehicles that are identical & have the same computer code.
So I guess I need to make more 0-60 runs and see what happens... it just blew my mind I lost a half second after the tune...

So the new questions are: A. Can the changes the adaptive crap makes be anaylized and put into a tune while retaining the early on low-end grunt? It'd be great to gain that HP is creates while keeping it's early-on pep.

B. If A. is possible, then can the AS stuff be disabled?
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
Owner’s Guide
F-150
page - 251 * A driving cycle consists of a cold engine startup followed by mixed city/highway driving
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #7  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
```
 

Last edited by jpdadeo; Jan 24, 2006 at 11:34 AM.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #8  
gobra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jpdadeo
hear ya go D
Man, that's just wrong!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #9  
dzervit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Thankfully one of my original questions cannot be answered with a search... well, I haven't found the answer yet!
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #10  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Gonna be a Bad day. Must be the moon. Some strange forces are at work here. When Dzervit has to be told to use the search, you know at the very least, the magnetic fields are reversed.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #11  
jward's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Are you kidding?

"Use the search", "learn to use the search", "bone up on your search skills" are the pet answers for these folks.

But, if D would smooch on a little ***, he'd a get a more to the point answer.

What you have to say, D, is, this 1714 is BEST piece of equipment I've bought for my truck. It's the BEST bang for your buck. Those guys are the smartest tuners that live. And well they should be, as they've been tuning vehicles since horses went out of style.

Then ask your question.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
dzervit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
I am king of the "use the search" phrase. However, searching didn't answer exactly what I wanted. JP's comment helped a little, but still cannot answer the secondary questions.

The 1714 is nice, but has it's issues (at least mine does). Screw the **** kissing.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #13  
SAJEFFC's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx
Dang it I got here late! Oh well, can't let this chance pass...
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #14  
jward's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
"However, searching didn't answer exactly what I wanted."

You're joking, of course.

Don't you know that EVERY question that can, could, has, and should be asked about tuning and chips is already in the archives?

They go years and years back. I even found a thread on how to tune the Vietnam era tanks. And I don't think they were Fords.

If you're the King, then watch for Brutus. Just keep that in mind.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #15  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Hi. Neanderthal here again....

What I've gleaned through my searches ( still good advice - either forums or Google/web, etc), is that activity such as adaptive learning is a 'core' function embedded in what passes for an operating system in the PCM.

Even if reverse-engineering allowed the ability to 'disable' it - it's probably copyrighted and protected for all I know - why would you want to?

This is a key feature of the PCM that allows the vehicle to adapt to changing conditions - generally a good thing for most folks, most of the time, raw performance notwithstanding. I believe one of the drivers for this type of control was to allow some method to compensate ( within reason) for tolerances, aging, wear, etc on various drivetrain components, sensors, etc, within a specified range or operation - codes set when those ranges are exceeded of course...

The post describing the adaptive learning variants was interesting too - even with identical PCM codes. A lot more going on here than meets the eye...

So Dzervit - I don't think it can be defeated, and since it can't, it's unlikely a tune will remain static or 'fresh' like you want. Good concept, though.

If your 1714 is overly harsh at default settings - I guess you've tried to adjust it within the range provided - any improvement? Because, if not, guess what the next advice is gonna be ?

In my case, the improvement over stock remains quite dramatic, even across seasons, gas variations, etc.

Yeah - looks like some strip time should be part of your 'driving cycle'

Jward - ease up buddy - we are all trying to help. I share your pain - I'm about the crappiest Searcher I've ever met, but I am damned persistent

... time to Search for a cold one ....

Cheers!
Grog
 

Last edited by MGDfan; Aug 16, 2005 at 12:59 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.