Thanks Mike.....
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: North Canton, Ohio
Thanks Mike.....
Check your fax machine Mike !!
I am sending the results of yesterdays Dyno I attended at Auto Performance and Service in Butler Pa. with the Pittsburgh SVT club.
I only had about 1/2 hour cool down time after the 1 1/2 hr.drive to get there, but here are the numbers.
1st pull: 628 ft/lbs
495 Horses
2nd pull: 602 ft/lbs
490 Horses
Air fuel 14.7 X .83 = 12.2 straight across.
The Technician that operated the Mustang Dyno just kept saying "Damn, what information did you provide for the person who did your Superchip?"
He was very, very impressed that with just the chip, filter, pulley, and throttle body that I was making these numbers.
Thanks again my friend.
Marc
I am sending the results of yesterdays Dyno I attended at Auto Performance and Service in Butler Pa. with the Pittsburgh SVT club.
I only had about 1/2 hour cool down time after the 1 1/2 hr.drive to get there, but here are the numbers.
1st pull: 628 ft/lbs
495 Horses
2nd pull: 602 ft/lbs
490 Horses
Air fuel 14.7 X .83 = 12.2 straight across.
The Technician that operated the Mustang Dyno just kept saying "Damn, what information did you provide for the person who did your Superchip?"
He was very, very impressed that with just the chip, filter, pulley, and throttle body that I was making these numbers.
Thanks again my friend.
Marc
Former Sponsor
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 13,385
Likes: 4
From: Virginia
Hi Marc,
That Lightning of yours really is making some nice power considering the relatively small amount that you have invested in it's mods.
The funny thing is those are the corrected numbers, it would be nice to see what the actual power figures were as they were most likely another 20-30 HP higher at the temperatures you dyno'd at. What makes it even better is the fact that this was done on a Mustang dyno, which will always read significantly lower than any Dynojet. Had you run on a Dynojet with uncorrected numbers, you'd have seen 425 HP to the wheels, and as far as I'm concerned, you're easily into the 400/500 club.
Overall, I'd say it's no wonder that dyno operator was impressed, I am too, with those numbers on that dyno under those conditions.
The 12.2:1 A/F looks *beautiful*, you're not giving up any power and on 94 octane pump gas, you can support that tune. That's a special program you have there (as you know from our past discussions), which is why it's out-powering and ET's better than any other program you've had in there, and doing it *safely*.
Thanks for your data & your post, as always!
That Lightning of yours really is making some nice power considering the relatively small amount that you have invested in it's mods.
The funny thing is those are the corrected numbers, it would be nice to see what the actual power figures were as they were most likely another 20-30 HP higher at the temperatures you dyno'd at. What makes it even better is the fact that this was done on a Mustang dyno, which will always read significantly lower than any Dynojet. Had you run on a Dynojet with uncorrected numbers, you'd have seen 425 HP to the wheels, and as far as I'm concerned, you're easily into the 400/500 club.
Overall, I'd say it's no wonder that dyno operator was impressed, I am too, with those numbers on that dyno under those conditions.
The 12.2:1 A/F looks *beautiful*, you're not giving up any power and on 94 octane pump gas, you can support that tune. That's a special program you have there (as you know from our past discussions), which is why it's out-powering and ET's better than any other program you've had in there, and doing it *safely*.
Thanks for your data & your post, as always!