Wiring gurus?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 12:10 AM
  #1  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Wiring gurus?

I have the Pioneer TS-SW3001S4 it is a 1500 max, 400 RMS, single coil, 2 OHM subwoofer.. I have two of them.. I HAVE/burned up.. http://www.crutchfield.com/S-W4dabHB...KAC-9104D.html this which is •500 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms (900 watts x 1 at 2 ohms.. I believe I have it run parallel, or bridged? I ran the power to one sub, then ran a piece from that sub to the other subwoofer? My first question is.. How does that work distributing the power? Also, was I correct in wiring that way and giving it around 450 per subwoofer? Also, is there a better amplifier I can purchase now to make it run better and more efficiently?

I wired it up like this..
 

Last edited by bigdog87; Dec 28, 2011 at 12:20 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 02:39 AM
  #2  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
If you wired it like your picture, then you did it correctly.

With your amp wired @ 2ohms each sub should be getting 450 watts.

When you attach wire between two subs like in the picture, the power will flow all the way through the connection. The amp doesn't know how many subs are hooked up too it. It only knows what independence (1ohms, 2ohms, 4ohms) the connection is, and that is how it determines how much power to put out.

As for getting a better amp, what is your budget?
 

Last edited by ErikShockey; Dec 28, 2011 at 03:09 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 02:41 AM
  #3  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I think I read your post wrong. Your amp is what burned up, not the subs?
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #4  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
If you wired it like your picture, then you did it correctly.

With your amp wired @ 2ohms each sub should be getting 450 watts.

When you attach wire between two subs like in the picture, the power will flow all the way through the connection. The amp doesn't know how many subs are hooked up too it. It only knows what independence (1ohms, 2ohms, 4ohms) the connection is, and that is how it determines how much power to put out.

As for getting a better amp, what is your budget?
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
I think I read your post wrong. Your amp is what burned up, not the subs?

I had the 3rd brake light leak issue... Amp got wet, turned it on cause I didn't know.. psssffttttt... Smell
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
pizzaman711's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,534
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsville, VA
Wait if you wired them like your picture then you put a 1ohm load to your amp, since you said you have two single 2 ohm subs. Wiring in parallel cuts the ohm load in half, and those kenwood amps definitely aren't stable at 1ohm. That definitely didn't help the life of that amp, and you'd be lucky to see 600rms max outta that amp at 2ohms not 900 like it says.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 11:37 PM
  #6  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Hmm I googled the model number he posted and it says the sub is a single four. But he did say it was 2 ohms, not sure?
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by pizzaman711
Wait if you wired them like your picture then you put a 1ohm load to your amp, since you said you have two single 2 ohm subs. Wiring in parallel cuts the ohm load in half, and those kenwood amps definitely aren't stable at 1ohm. That definitely didn't help the life of that amp, and you'd be lucky to see 600rms max outta that amp at 2ohms not 900 like it says.
Well, the amp got wet, so it had no hope either way.. Any idea on an amp that WOULD give me 400ish to each running parallel?

Originally Posted by ErikShockey
Hmm I googled the model number he posted and it says the sub is a single four. But he did say it was 2 ohms, not sure?

I may of put the wrong.. They are single 2 ohm
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:03 AM
  #8  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
How much are you looking to spend?

Here is one I recommend, but there is cheaper options.

http://www.woofersetc.com/p-9255-saz...amplifier.aspx
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:06 AM
  #9  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
How much are you looking to spend?

Here is one I recommend, but there is cheaper options.

http://www.woofersetc.com/p-9255-saz...amplifier.aspx

150-200? I don't want the best of the best, gotta pay for school and stuff.. But I now have a 120 dollar box and 240 in subwoofers sitting there useless.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:12 AM
  #10  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I'm not sure if this amp will do rated RMS power, but it will work and is in your price range.

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...NX1.1000D.html
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:16 AM
  #11  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
I'm not sure if this amp will do rated RMS power, but it will work and is in your price range.

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...NX1.1000D.html


Wow, it says 1000x1 @ 1 ohm.. So theoretically would give 500 to each... But most brands don't REALLY do RMS.. So if it says 500. Will really push 350-400 about what I want? Basically.. I wasn't giving the subs RMS before either.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:25 AM
  #12  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Well it's rated at 1000 @ 14.4 volts. I would guess it puts out around 800-875 @ 13-14v. It should be better than the amp you had before.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:27 AM
  #13  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
Well it's rated at 1000 @ 14.4 volts. I would guess it puts out around 800-875 @ 13-14v. It should be better than the amp you had before.
Can I still run it in a parallel like I had it before? I'm hoping to unscrew, and screw the wires into this amp and take all of 5 minutes.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #14  
ErikShockey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Yes it should. Do you know what size fuse your power wire has in it? Also what size is the power wire?
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:34 AM
  #15  
bigdog87's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
From: Destin, Florida
Originally Posted by ErikShockey
Yes it should. Do you know what size fuse your power wire has in it? Also what size is the power wire?

I want to say 30A and power wire is 4ga I believe.. Been 5 years since I ran that power wire. .. One LAST question, sorry to bug you.

How the hell would I hook up my remote wire to THAT remote input? My remote is literally a wire that has the same basically clamp as the power/ground, etc..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM.