2015 - 2020 F-150
View Poll Results: Do you think that Ford should have continued to offer the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?
Yes, it should be available for the 2015 F150
26
65.00%
Yes, but only in a premium model like the Raptor
4
10.00%
No.
10
25.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week: Do you want the 6.2L V8 back for 2015?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
Patrick R.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
|
IB Editor
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Question of the Week: Do you want the 6.2L V8 back for 2015?

The 6.2L from the SVT Raptor has not been brought forward to the next generation of the Ford F150, seemingly leaving the V8 duties up to the 5.0L mill for the foreseeable future. this means that the most powerful engine from the 2014 F150 lineup is absent, leaving those who want big power no option but to build their trucks after buying them.

With that in mind, we come to our Question of the Week:
Do you think that Ford should have continued to offer the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150 pickup…even if without a Raptor?

Vote in the poll above and tell us why you feel this way in the thread below!
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #2  
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 3
From: Linn, MO
No need. The 3.5L EB can handle it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
No need. The 3.5L EB can handle it.
If Ford wanted to make a high performance version of the EB they would only need to swap the K03s for K04s, add larger inlet piping, intercooler and fueling. Just doing that would blow away any other truck motor on the market. The best thing is those two turbos are interchangeable in their mounting. It would be an easy swap for them to do.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 05:34 PM
  #4  
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 3
From: Linn, MO
Originally Posted by Wookie
If Ford wanted to make a high performance version of the EB they would only need to swap the K03s for K04s, add larger inlet piping, intercooler and fueling. Just doing that would blow away any other truck motor on the market. The best thing is those two turbos are interchangeable in their mounting. It would be an easy swap for them to do.
Just wait for the next gen 3.5EB. Imagine scaling the 2.7L up to a 3.5L

420 HP/ 485 ft-lbs

 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 06:04 PM
  #5  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Doing what I listed would be an easy 100-150 Hp bump. The torque numbers would increase about like that too. The bigger turbos will pump more air at a higher boost level but at a lower temp. The rest of the engine is already capable of a lot more power.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2014 | 07:36 PM
  #6  
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: New Harbour, NFLD
can't forsee it, but I'd be glad. but what I really want is an identical engine except downsized.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 02:24 PM
  #7  
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Port Washington, WI
No, it does good in the F-150, but the 3.5tt does it better. The 6.2 is fine in a super duty. Ford need a 6.8 v-10 replacement for the big trucks. When is THAT coming?
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 7, 2014 | 06:36 PM
  #8  
dranger962000's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: colorado
i cant see owning a full size truck without a v8 should have kept the 6.2 ive driven an f150 with a 6.2 a 5.0 and a 3.5 the ecoboost was the least satisfying to drive it sounds like i was in my wifes fusion!! pretty lame it doesnt get any better fuel mileage than a 5.0 anyways
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2014 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
JohnBoy88's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 2
From: North Central Florida
Eh, I don't really see the 6.2 as a necessity for the F-150. I think it's great they have a better gas V8 option for the Super Duty than the old less than impressive 5.4, but with the 5.0 and the Ecoboost engine options, I feel like the 6.2 would be a superfluous engine option. Especially now that in 2015 there will be two Ecoboost options in addition to the 5.0 and 3.5 NA base V6. So keep the 6.2 going in the Super Duty, and let the 5.0 and Ecoboost handle the half ton powertrain. They are both more than capable.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 06:11 AM
  #10  
bluegreensf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
 

Last edited by bluegreensf150; Sep 8, 2014 at 06:13 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 07:08 AM
  #11  
Backnblack_66's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Spring, TX
Originally Posted by JohnBoy88
Eh, I don't really see the 6.2 as a necessity for the F-150.
I think it's more of a question of Want than Need..
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2014 | 09:44 AM
  #12  
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 3
From: Linn, MO
Originally Posted by dranger962000
pretty lame it doesnt get any better fuel mileage than a 5.0 anyways
That's not really the point. It's supposed to either tow more and get similar fuel economy, or tow the same and get better fuel economy. When comparing fuel economy, compare the 3.5L EB to the 6.2L. You know, the engines with the same tow ratings.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:13 AM
  #13  
Casey05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Mukilteo, WA
6.2L is cool and all, but Ford has to keep the avg MGP's up. That wouldn't do if the big V8 was available in the F150
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: New Harbour, NFLD
damn EPA lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2014 | 03:22 PM
  #15  
crazynip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 5
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Casey05
6.2L is cool and all, but Ford has to keep the avg MGP's up. That wouldn't do if the big V8 was available in the F150
If Ford wanted to keep MPG up, they would offer a 5.0 in the super duty... properly geared it would be fine.

You people seem to forget that most truck engines until the 2000's had under 200 HP and they did just fine...

Gear them low and let em pull
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.