2009 - 2014 F-150

New Warning To All Ford Ecoboost Owners!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2014 | 08:17 AM
  #16  
F 1Fiddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Holt, MO
Of all the people that I know that have EB's, none have had this issue. I have had two, and I have not had any issues. There are several guys I know that have over 100K and have been pleased with them. Everyone that I work with that have them puts about 50K/year on them, so we drive them a lot everyday. I think longer drives, and harder pulling, is good on these engines. It keeps their temps up and steady, and doesn't allow as much of that build up to happen. This little engine is barely working when you are driving empty miles.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2014 | 10:39 PM
  #17  
makuloco2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by F 1Fiddy
Of all the people that I know that have EB's, none have had this issue. I have had two, and I have not had any issues. There are several guys I know that have over 100K and have been pleased with them. Everyone that I work with that have them puts about 50K/year on them, so we drive them a lot everyday. I think longer drives, and harder pulling, is good on these engines. It keeps their temps up and steady, and doesn't allow as much of that build up to happen. This little engine is barely working when you are driving empty miles.
Yeah but I get allot of people coming to me complaining that the dealer cannot fix it and have done all the tsb's coils, plugs new coolers etc for misfire issues and makes you wonder how many there are out there just being misdiagnosed. We will see with time.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2014 | 01:49 AM
  #18  
MrEvil's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
The way I figure with this intake valve issue is this. The 7.3L Powerstroke had PCV and it is direct injected, those engines go half a million miles, sometimes more, and never have the top-end touched. When my Injection Harnesses failed on my engine and I replaced them the intercooler pipes (hot and cold side) were absolutely filthy with oil vapor build-up when I removed them. I didn't put a borescope into the intake plenums, but I imagine they were filthy all the way to the chamber. Why is it not a problem for a Diesel, but is for a DI gas engine?
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 03:23 PM
  #19  
makuloco2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
I would imagine it has to do with the fact diesel fuel does not vaporized nowhere near what gas does to start, the higher compression and compression ignition are another major factor making them more resilient.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 12:05 PM
  #20  
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
Anybody remember the scam hydrogen generators? All they were were a water boiler that the steam was funneled into the intake. As we know from WWII fighter airplane engines steam is a fabulous carbon/soot deposit remover. Not having an EB to invent a system for it, anybody with one that wants to get inventive would surely be a winner, not to mention a fabulous enterprise. The heat source could easily be the exhaust pipe. This is REAL close to the urea that the diesels use to remove soot/carbon from the engines and exhaust systems. Urea is 80% water, FWIW.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2014 | 05:52 PM
  #21  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by Labnerd
Anybody remember the scam hydrogen generators? All they were were a water boiler that the steam was funneled into the intake. As we know from WWII fighter airplane engines steam is a fabulous carbon/soot deposit remover. Not having an EB to invent a system for it, anybody with one that wants to get inventive would surely be a winner, not to mention a fabulous enterprise. The heat source could easily be the exhaust pipe. This is REAL close to the urea that the diesels use to remove soot/carbon from the engines and exhaust systems. Urea is 80% water, FWIW.
I've actually been kicking around ways to make something like this or make setup that connects a can of intake cleaner to the PCV inlet. With as many DI cars are on the road there is a ton of cash to be made from it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2014 | 09:39 PM
  #22  
crazynip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 5
From: Florida
Got to love this... we are all beta testers these days

GM is having fun with it's second go-round on it's ridiculous 8-6-4 engine, it's almost as much of a POS as the original one they put in caddys
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2014 | 05:25 PM
  #23  
makuloco2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by crazynip
Got to love this... we are all beta testers these days

GM is having fun with it's second go-round on it's ridiculous 8-6-4 engine, it's almost as much of a POS as the original one they put in caddys
I know that is the way it seems they made the technology good enough but not perfect. An oem solution to the problem would be fine but we have yet to see any new word except for the new tsb for the 3.5l EB in the cars.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 04:56 PM
  #24  
makuloco2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
I also just posted a new video on how to prevent as much of this carbon buildup as possible.

 

Last edited by makuloco2000; Jan 31, 2015 at 03:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 05:59 PM
  #25  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
Originally Posted by makuloco2000
I also just posted a new video on how to prevent as much of this carbon buildup as possible.
Got a link??
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:15 PM
  #26  
makuloco2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by aussiekeeper
Got a link??
Sorry yes-
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:37 PM
  #27  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
OK, I saw that one. Thanks. I have 18,000 miles on mine but the first 16,000 miles I had catch cans on it. The drivers side didn't have hardly any oil in them, but the right side had about 2-3 tablespoons every 2 weeks or so. In my opinion, that is a lot of oil.
So what is Ford going to do about it? A company near here has done a long term test on an E/B and the valves looked very coked up at around 18,000 miles and got worse as time went by. Fuel mileage was also affected.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 10:35 PM
  #28  
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
One of the German car makers is having deposit issues with its turbo direct injection engines as well. They are playing with isobutanol with an amine that is introduced at the throttle body and the engine is allowed to idle for an hour. The engine literally is running off of the isobutanol as the injectors are not firing. I haven't seen any of it, just heard about it. Obviously the turbos are not running at idle. Isbutanol is being considered as a replacement for ethanol in our fuels. It has 98% of the energy of our gasoline and does not absorb water. It can be made from most any plant life but certain algaes are supposed to be ideal. I don't see this as a fix for deposits in any direct injection engine but it might just burn cleaner creating less of them. I haven't seen any data on it yet.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2015 | 10:15 AM
  #29  
RevBiker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
I don't know if this would apply here or not. Volvo's with 5 & 6 cyl engines have a problem with valves getting carbon up and tapping or miss fire on start ups. The fix is to put car in low gear, run it down the road at high rpm for about a mile or 2 at a steady speed. This seems to clear up the problem every time.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.