2009 - 2014 F-150

Ecoboost Vs Nissan Titan and Chevy 6.2 towing 10k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2013 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Ecoboost Vs Nissan Titan and Chevy 6.2 towing 10k

Really waiting to see how close the ecoboost is with the 6.2 Silverado that video should be out soon..

First Video is The 2014 Nissan towing 10k up the Ike Gauntlet


Ecoboost


Chevy

 

Last edited by KingRanchCoy; Nov 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 12:11 AM
  #2  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
Screen says "video does not exist".
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 01:53 AM
  #3  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
The Eco should actually have the advantage only because they are testing thousands of feet above sea level where a normally aspirated engine makes 30% less power. A twin turbo motor has the advantage in this situation. Let's see a test at sea level & it will be fair. Very few people drive at 11000 feet above sea level on a daily basis.
 

Last edited by risupercrewman; Nov 16, 2013 at 02:02 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #4  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
They should be working now.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 10:02 AM
  #5  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by risupercrewman
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 10:33 AM
  #6  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by KingRanchCoy
The facts are the facts my friend. A normal aspirated engine will lose at least 30% of its power at 11,000 ft above sea level. The dude in the video even says that when he tested the GM 5.3 on that same roadway.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 11:35 AM
  #7  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Where is the Chevy test?
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 16, 2013 | 02:33 PM
  #8  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
It'll Prob be Monday. Chevy the last one they are testing
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
^^^^^It will take that long for it to catch up................
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 05:01 PM
  #10  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
Originally Posted by risupercrewman
The facts are the facts my friend. A normal aspirated engine will lose at least 30% of its power at 11,000 ft above sea level. The dude in the video even says that when he tested the GM 5.3 on that same roadway.
So would you prefer they bring the Ford 6.2 up instead of the eco?

Why is the Titan even there?
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #11  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by KMAC0694
So would you prefer they bring the Ford 6.2 up instead of the eco?

Why is the Titan even there?
Absolutely. The test is not in favor of any normal aspirated engine at 12000 feet above sea level. The Titan was overloaded by 1000 lbs so I don't even know why it was even there. Lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Originally Posted by risupercrewman
Absolutely. The test is not in favor of any normal aspirated engine at 12000 feet above sea level. The Titan was overloaded by 1000 lbs so I don't even know why it was even there. Lol
They had to have one to pick on! Ha! The Titan did have cooler front brakes after going down the hill. Advantage Titan!

They should test Toyota and Dodge while they are at it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
joel321's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Nice harbor freight thermometer
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 09:41 PM
  #14  
MeanGene's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 6
From: Simi Valley CA
Originally Posted by Roadie
They had to have one to pick on! Ha! The Titan did have cooler front brakes after going down the hill. Advantage Titan!

They should test Toyota and Dodge while they are at it.
They did test the Toyota (VER 1) and it was about the same as the Titan, floored all the way and not able to maintain the 60 MPH.

They test up a grade as that is the hardest real world test your going to have pulling a trailer. Maybe, they should include a 5.4 with a super charger, I would like to see that one.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2013 | 10:32 PM
  #15  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
Originally Posted by risupercrewman
Absolutely. The test is not in favor of any normal aspirated engine at 12000 feet above sea level. The Titan was overloaded by 1000 lbs so I don't even know why it was even there. Lol
30% loss (your number) for the Chevy, and 15% loss (made something up cause I don't know what either actually are) for the EB put the numbers around the same values.

A supercharged 5.4 can't tow 10k lbs sustained though, nor can any supercharged truck for that matter.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.