2009 - 2014 F-150

2012 ecoboost, is it true that it runs rich on gas for the 1st 3000 miles?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 8, 2012 | 12:04 PM
  #1  
Spellicy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: ny
2012 ecoboost, is it true that it runs rich on gas for the 1st 3000 miles?

Mine is getting 18 MPG, 4x4 screw 3.73. I AM driving it pretty hard passing people often and alot of city miles but curious if it should go up after 3k miles like some have suggested.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #2  
HM8404's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: LA
Not sure if I have seen definitive proof either way yet
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 01:44 PM
  #3  
willy700's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
My dealer said dont watch the fuel economy until you have a few tanks through. Anyway I am at 2000 miles 4x4, 3.55 and getting 22 mpg, 90% hwy driving between 50 - 70 mph, I cant see it getting much better but if it does great!
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 02:14 PM
  #4  
EsJayEs's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 825
Likes: 2
From: Virginia Beach
There are too many variables to compare fuel economy from one truck and driver to another. Here are some factors to consider:

- Highway vs. city
- Terrain
- Rate of acceleration
- Cruising speed
- Load
- 2WD vs. 4WD
- Axle ratio

But the biggest difference is you. If you want better fuel economy, stay on the highway and off the throttle. It's that simple.

It is normal for fuel economy to be slightly worse for a new vehicle. As components break in, there is less friction. But it's so slight, that it's not worth mentioning.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #5  
hydro1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Originally Posted by EsJayEs
But the biggest difference is you. If you want better fuel economy, stay on the highway and off the throttle. It's that simple.

It is normal for fuel economy to be slightly worse for a new vehicle. As components break in, there is less friction. But it's so slight, that it's not worth mentioning.
I don't believe there is anything that tells the compurter to run rich for 3k. If there is, I haven't seen it. The two quotes above are what I believe and have seen with my truck.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 04:02 PM
  #6  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Think about this, what benefit would there be to by dumping extra fuel into the motor? Some 2 stroke motors do this to provide extra lubrication during the break in period. The EB is a 4 stroke, what's the benefit?

You might see a small gradual increase due to the motor breaking in and parts loosening up. On my EB this seemed to happen till around the 5000 mile mark.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2012 | 06:18 PM
  #7  
gasbrnr's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: CA
When I was into performance boats with Mercruiser IO's, it was said that the first fifty Hrs. the ECM would tell the engine to run rich. You could see black soot on the stern (rear) after a day on the water. I think it lets the engine run cooler but not positive.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 8, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
hardlymoving's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Did not check the gas mileage on the first tank but have not noticed any change in the gas mileage after that and am not at 4400 miles. The average after the first tank has been 18.4 mpg with higher amounts on straight highway driving at 65 & 70 mph. Am very pleased with the Ecoboost, 4x4 Supercab with the 3.55 gearing.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 01:16 AM
  #9  
Mark Miller's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
IMO,It seems to me 50 degrees and lower temps the EcoBoost might stay richer on the fuel mixture.My truck the mileage and performance seem to drop with temps under 50 degrees.Above 50 the mileage seems better and my truck seems to run the best with warmer outside temps.I also think that maybe they have them run richer in the colder weather because of the turbo's.Cooler air usually wants more fuel IMO.

Later Mark.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 04:53 AM
  #10  
JohnnyCashAK's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage, AK
Originally Posted by Mark Miller
IMO,It seems to me 50 degrees and lower temps the EcoBoost might stay richer on the fuel mixture.My truck the mileage and performance seem to drop with temps under 50 degrees.Above 50 the mileage seems better and my truck seems to run the best with warmer outside temps.I also think that maybe they have them run richer in the colder weather because of the turbo's.Cooler air usually wants more fuel IMO.

Later Mark.
I'd say I agree, but it's hard to judge when I'm usually in 4x4 when the temps are below 50.

I can attest to my MPG improving around the 4th month I owned mine. When I bought my 2005 Scab, the mechanic who walked me through the new features explained that the truck will learn driving habits, conditions, and the quirks of it's own engine to get the best performance possible. The more I drove it, the better mileage I'd get. I can assume this has only gotten better with the newer vehicles.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 07:07 AM
  #11  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Wookie
Think about this, what benefit would there be to by dumping extra fuel into the motor? Some 2 stroke motors do this to provide extra lubrication during the break in period. The EB is a 4 stroke, what's the benefit?

You might see a small gradual increase due to the motor breaking in and parts loosening up. On my EB this seemed to happen till around the 5000 mile mark.
Originally Posted by hydro1
I don't believe there is anything that tells the compurter to run rich for 3k. If there is, I haven't seen it. The two quotes above are what I believe and have seen with my truck.

^^^ This. ^^^ These fellers nailed it.

This is another one of those urban legends/myths started by some uninformed dealer lackey and then parroted here as gospel (Hey - it's the Dealer reps right? It must be true, lol).

Much like dealer-generated misinformation concerning the latest-gen SP507/515's being tapered and or/welded. Nope and/or Nope.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 07:10 AM
  #12  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by gasbrnr
When I was into performance boats with Mercruiser IO's, it was said that the first fifty Hrs. the ECM would tell the engine to run rich. You could see black soot on the stern (rear) after a day on the water. I think it lets the engine run cooler but not positive.
Purty sure yer ol'outboards or IO's don't have any cats or O2's to bugger up by running real rich.


MGD
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 10:31 AM
  #13  
gasbrnr's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Purty sure yer ol'outboards or IO's don't have any cats or O2's to bugger up by running real rich.


MGD
Ur right, No cats
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2012 | 03:17 PM
  #14  
bucky919's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Minot, ND
Ya im sure there is something in there, along the lines they over fuel, but its probably so minor you won't notice the difference. On my Ecoboost I had over 3,000 miles on it towing, the first 3 days I owned it. Every truck is alittle different, you can have two identical trucks and there both going to get different mileage no matter what. 18mpg is pretty dang good for a truck if you ask me and probably is about average for a ecoboost from what ive seen, if you bought a truck you probably shouldn't be worried about the mileage, if you cared you that much should have gotten a different vehicle.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2012 | 01:49 AM
  #15  
goducks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: West coast
Thats the boost from the Eco.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.