2009 - 2014 F-150

F-150: Motor Trend's Truck of the Year!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #1  
Rambo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
F-150: Motor Trend's Truck of the Year!



F-150 did it again...

"It's the combination of advancement in design, engineering excellence, efficiency, safety, value, and the performance of intended function that has earned the Ford F-150 the title of Motor Trend's Truck of the Year."

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/...#ixzz1gLpBaoAL
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 02:44 PM
  #2  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
for f150

That stripe is just awful......
 

Last edited by 88racing; Dec 13, 2011 at 03:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #3  
Rambo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
I'm liking the new FX Appearance Package in red. If I bought it, the stripe is staying. It ties it all together.





More photos: http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/..._01.html#photo
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 1
From: minnesota - ubetcha
The article kind of disses the 5.0. Interesting how they rave over the eco....
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Port Washington, WI
no 5.0 love?

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
The article kind of disses the 5.0. Interesting how they rave over the eco....
Yeah, they even said it gets the same mileage, so why the big favor. Slightly more pulling capacity doesn't seem worthy of praise for the extra $850 and worse pulling MPG (from what i read on these forums)
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 11:24 PM
  #6  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 1
From: minnesota - ubetcha
In their test flogging both engines = same mpg. Real world a slight edge to eco.

In their test they said the towing power of the eco is far better than the 5.0. Not the capacity. I just didnt realize it was THAT big of a difference, but apparently it is, or at least to them...
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 02:17 AM
  #7  
#16F150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Leonardtown, MD
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 13, 2011 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Congradulations Ford on a job well done! All of the new engines are winners in my book!
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Okay, I have never seen why people do the black wheel thing. To me, it has always been uuuuuuugly. I just saw a guy buy a new Superduty in white with the tan two-tone, who ripped off the wheels to add blackwalls and black rims. Huh?

Now, that said, I love those 20" FX4 black rims. They look sweet... But ONLY on a black truck. I may have to consider an upgrade on my next truck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 11:33 AM
  #10  
birddog_61's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Graham TX
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Okay, I have never seen why people do the black wheel thing. To me, it has always been uuuuuuugly. I just saw a guy buy a new Superduty in white with the tan two-tone, who ripped off the wheels to add blackwalls and black rims. Huh?

Now, that said, I love those 20" FX4 black rims. They look sweet... But ONLY on a black truck. I may have to consider an upgrade on my next truck.
I agree, black wheels are very hard to pull off. However when done right they look fantastic, it doesn't have to be a black truck for me but it has to have the correct amount of black accents to look right.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
Rambo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
They said they got about the same mileage; however, it should be noted that:

1) EcoBoost was 4x2 and 5.0 was 4x4. Advantage EcoBoost; until you see that the EcoBoost was a loaded up Platinum SuperCrew and the 5.0 was an XLT SuperCab. The EcoBoost SuperCrew was slightly heavier and less aerodynamic.

2) What's more, EcoBoost towed a 8,250 lb trailer and hauled a 1,275 lbs.
The 5.0 towed a 6,900 lb trailer and hauled 1,185.

The heavier less aerodynamic SuperCrew EcoBoost towing and hauling more weight, still got about the same mileage as the SuperCab 5.0 towing significantly less weight.

If they want to make a valid comparison on mileage, use the same cabs and use the same trailers.

link: http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/...#ixzz1gLpBaoAL
 

Last edited by Rambo; Dec 13, 2011 at 02:26 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #12  
nards444's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Tell me if I am wrong but I dont beleive you can get the 5.o to tow 11,300 like the ecoboost, thats why I bought the ecoboost, I tow about 10k and wanted the extra room to play with. Thought the 5.0 can do like 10,300. So that extra 700lbs is worth the 700 bucks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #13  
nards444's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Nihilus
Yeah, they even said it gets the same mileage, so why the big favor. Slightly more pulling capacity doesn't seem worthy of praise for the extra $850 and worse pulling MPG (from what i read on these forums)
What people have to start understanding is not the MPG, but the fact the truck can tow what it can tow. I am getting 16 in the city or so, 21 HWY, which is awesome coming from a diesel. Towing my 10k boat I get 10, my diesel only got 11. Hook up that 10k boat to that 5.0 and check it out once.

I too am kind of disapointed in towing MPG, but look until this configuration nothing could tow 11,300 and I was stuck with my F250 paying out the ace for fuel and Maint.

Flat out there is nothing on the market in this class that has the peformance that this has with the MPG's. So I say to spend money on a V8 just because of the sound is not worth it.

Like it or not MPG's is going to dominate car building, not only because of CAFE but because of peopls wallets, we will not see $2 a gallon ever again, I doubt we see $3 a gallon either. Rumor is chevy will have an ecoboost out next year with its totally new line up and dodge is working on something. As much as I love the American V8 I think its going to go by the way side, these turboed engines are only going to get better.
 

Last edited by nards444; Dec 13, 2011 at 02:36 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 03:09 PM
  #14  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Doesn't matter which engine you have and what the "tow rating" is - towing 10k with a 1/2 ton truck will almost always put you over one of the other limits - such as GVWR, GAWR, and/or payload. The max tow rating is under artificial ideal conditions - 150# driver, 1/4 tank of gas, NO cargo or passengers whatsoever, and minimum tongue weight.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #15  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by glc
Doesn't matter which engine you have and what the "tow rating" is - towing 10k with a 1/2 ton truck will almost always put you over one of the other limits - such as GVWR, GAWR, and/or payload. The max tow rating is under artificial ideal conditions - 150# driver, 1/4 tank of gas, NO cargo or passengers whatsoever, and minimum tongue weight.
Amen, Brother! Can I hear an Amen?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM.