2009 - 2014 F-150

Finally drove the ecoboost and 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #1  
Maxout05's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Finally drove the ecoboost and 5.0

Local dealer is pushing out new 2011's. So stopped in to try a few. First was the ecoboost. I found it to be good power, but nothing great. Also the display read 11.2-11.7 mpg and it had 113 miles on it. Wasnt impressed at all. It was a nice truck but nothing to give up my 2010 for. Then drove the 5.0. It felt identical to my 2010, except it has a sic growl from the exhaust, gotta love that!
Overall I found both to be nice trucks, but dont see a huge improvement over my current truck. Did I just get a fast 2010 or something? BTW mines only the 4.63v with the 6 speed.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #2  
formuladriver01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
I had a 2010 for a little bit with the 5.4L and I felt a huge difference between my 2010 and a 2011 ecoboost. I loved the ecoboost. I have not yet driven the 5.0 yet. I plan to in the beginning of the year.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #3  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
If you think the EB Is no significant improvement over your 4.6v, then I think you need to recalibrate your kiestermeter.

My 2010 5.4L is definitely broke in, and gets rubber very easy -not just chirps, and I find the EB a far quicker engine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #4  
jtwoodall's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, TX
The displays shows that MPG because of every person who test drove it before put there foot down over and over again.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
mtnbikes's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I used to have a 5.4 (2009), test drove the 5.0, and now own a 2011 EB. There is a world of difference between my EB and the 5.4 I had. The 5.0 and EB are great engines...the EB is just a little quicker. EB fuel economy is slightly better than the 5.0...not much though. The guage you're reading is average MPG...someone has a lead foot.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 09:45 PM
  #6  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
There could be something wrong with that particular EB - try a different one if you can.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 08:24 AM
  #7  
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 1
From: minnesota - ubetcha
Try this....

Go 60 in your 4.6 powered truck and give it some serious gas to accelerate like you are going to pass. How many gears will it drop to give you good acceleration? 2 or 3? In an eco it sometimes won't even need to shift down or if it does, only one gear and you'd better watch that speedo before you lose your license. But in a 4.6 - you need not worrry b/c the effort it takes to move the truck make you keenly aware of your speed.

So...

4.6 engine worry is: "I hope I can accelerate and make this pass"

Eco engine worry is: "I hope I over accelerate and go too fast during this pass"
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 10, 2011 | 11:25 AM
  #8  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by glc
There could be something wrong with that particular EB - try a different one if you can.
The first time I drove an EcoBoost F150 was when Ford was sending the testers around the country for people to drive. I wasn't impressed. I only had about twenty minutes to drive it though. I never had a chance to get on it. It didn't feel all that powerful to me.

The second time I drove an EcoBoost F150 was when I got one as a service loaner when I brought one of our E250s in for service.

I had this truck for a couple days. I got to put a few miles on it. I didn't hot rod this truck. I just drove it. It felt much better than the first one that I drove. There was plenty of power. It was very quiet and very civil to drive. When I picked up the truck it read about 14mpg on the display. When I brought it back it read 20mpg. Had just under 1000mi on the odo.

Both trucks were four door 4X4's.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #9  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
The mileage on a car sitting at the dealership means nothing. It sits for a long time idling while the salesman talks about it, it then goes on a test drive where the prospective buyer runs the nuts off it to see what it has then goes back to idle some more while the salesman talks again. Repeat this process till the car is sold, then the real numbers show up. Also, don't look at the mileage on a cold EB. Mines gets around 12 or so for the first 8 minutes, it then jumps up to the 20 area. All on the same road, at the same speed. It seems there is an enrichment cycle built into the truck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 04:34 PM
  #10  
Ragged05FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: White Lake, MI
Originally Posted by jtwoodall
The displays shows that MPG because of every person who test drove it before put there foot down over and over again.
x2 ^^^^


That thing has had a rough 114 miles. I honestly floored the crap out of my tester just to see what all the ecoboost hype was about.
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 09:17 PM
  #11  
1st Time Ford's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
Try this....

In an eco it sometimes won't even need to shift down or if it does, only one gear and you'd better watch that speedo before you lose your license.
So...

4.6 engine worry is: "I hope I can accelerate and make this pass"

Eco engine worry is: "I hope I over accelerate and go too fast during this pass"

This is so true about the ecoboost motor. I recommend anybody test driving one to take it on the highway, get to cruising speed and make a pass. It is amazing how smooth the motor and tranny work together. Oh yeah, after the pass take a look at your speedo.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 11:25 AM
  #12  
2004f1505.4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Kimberley BC
I did the same thing, drove a eco, then a 5.0. I ended up going with the 5.0 only because of the sound. I just couldnt wrap my head around a V6 sounding truck. Also the 5.0 you can throw it in manual mode and rev it to the moon.

I came from a 04 f150 5.4 with a chip and intake to a 5.0 with a chip and intake. Dont get me wrong I LOVE my new truck but for the $25000 diffrence i'm kicking myself for not just keeping my 04
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #13  
06yz250f's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,657
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2004f1505.4x4
Also the 5.0 you can throw it in manual mode and rev it to the moon.
You should be able to do that with the ECO as well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #14  
PUMPED 101's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: PITTSBURGH
Originally Posted by Maxout05
Local dealer is pushing out new 2011's. So stopped in to try a few. First was the ecoboost. I found it to be good power, but nothing great. Also the display read 11.2-11.7 mpg and it had 113 miles on it. Wasnt impressed at all. It was a nice truck but nothing to give up my 2010 for. Then drove the 5.0. It felt identical to my 2010, except it has a sic growl from the exhaust, gotta love that!
Overall I found both to be nice trucks, but dont see a huge improvement over my current truck. Did I just get a fast 2010 or something? BTW mines only the 4.63v with the 6 speed.
EcoBoost would/should murder your truck. Bottom line
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 10:46 PM
  #15  
Skrappy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Denver
No doubt about it. I owned that same truck and now have a 2011 Ecoboost FX4. I have put about 8k miles on it so far, it absolutely destroys that truck. Not even close!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.