2009 - 2014 F-150

V6 EB vs V8 Ram vs V8 Chevy towing uphill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 03:57 AM
  #1  
Rambo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
V6 EB vs V8 Ram vs V8 Chevy towing uphill

Here's the latest torture test at the Davis Dam....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W_bbzRLdDM

link: http://www.youtube.com/user/fordtruc.../6/-W_bbzRLdDM
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 06:29 AM
  #2  
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
I'd like to see the 5.0 Coyote run up against the Ram and Chevy.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #3  
DarkShadowSTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Brecksville, Ohio
43 seconds faster than the Silverado!
My next truck will definitely be an Ecoboost.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
99and04f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: College Station , TX
My 2014 or 2015 will most likely have an Eco-Boost....... Still not 100 percent behind the ecoboost, but once it shows its quality and durability (it will). Then I will be sold.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
gregsf150stx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
I am not sure I'd pay an extra $1,750 for an ECOBOOST engine
BASED STRICTLY OFF THE RESULTS OF THAT VIDEO!
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #6  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by gregsf150stx
I am not sure I'd pay an extra $1,750 for an ECOBOOST engine
BASED STRICTLY OFF THE RESULTS OF THAT VIDEO!
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
Greg Matty's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin
I'd like to see the 5.0 Coyote run up against the Ram and Chevy.
That will be the deal maker for me.

As impressive as the 0-60 time was, that is really irrelevant to me. I don't really care how quickly I get up to speed, I care about maintaining that uphill. The 3.2 second margin of victory after a 3.5 run doesn't really amount to much of an advantage for me either.

Still it is awesome to see Ford do this with a 3.5 liter V6. Now let's get those formal fuel economy numbers.

I am still trying to decide between a 5.0 Ford and a 5.7 Dodge. I have a great Ford dealer that is easy to work with and that weighs heavily in Ford's favor.


Greg
 

Last edited by Greg Matty; Dec 12, 2010 at 11:20 PM.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 12, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #8  
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by Greg Matty
That will be the deal maker for me.



I am still trying to decide between a 5.0 Ford and a 5.7 Dodge. I have a great Ford dealer that is easy to work with and that weighs heavily in Ford's favor.


Greg
I've had 2 Rams both with the hemis the first one didn't have the MDS (or whatever the thing is called to drop cylinders at cruise) and performed pretty good - 17ish hwy mpg. The second one with MDS was bad. Lucky to get 14 hwy mpg and didn't perform worth a hoot. Both interiors were barely acceptable. Poor fit & finish. I think the latest version Ram has a lot nicer interior but still has MDS (I think). No more Rams for me.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #9  
88rxn/a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: ludlow,PA
this thing just keeps going!
i think my next truck will have the ecoboost. assuming i can get 25MPG on NORMAL driving.
if it can only do 20 than im going to be hesitant. imagine what the programmers (SCT and so on) are going to do to this motor! these motors are going to be able to make some serious power!
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
gregsf150stx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.


An executive at Ford told the Detroit Free Press today that the EcoBoost V-6 will be a $1750 option

Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/6690050/au...#ixzz17vLveIb9


According to the Free Press, Lapine said that the 365-horsepower twin-turbo 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 engine and its 420 pound-feet of twist will be priced $1750 above the entry-level engine, a naturally aspirated 3.7-liter V-6. According to Ford's website, the base 2011 F-150 XL will start at $23,390 after delivery charges, so assuming the EcoBoost engine is available with all trim levels and all cab and body configurations, the starting price would come out to just $25,140.



Read more: http://wot.motortrend.com/6690050/au...#ixzz17vNUa09u
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #11  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by Smokewagun
Where'd you get that figure? I think it's $750.
It is $750 over the 5.0 which is a $1000 option over the standard 3.7 V6, making the Ecoboost a $1750 option total.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 02:39 PM
  #12  
Greg Matty's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jus Cruisin
I've had 2 Rams both with the hemis the first one didn't have the MDS (or whatever the thing is called to drop cylinders at cruise) and performed pretty good - 17ish hwy mpg. The second one with MDS was bad. Lucky to get 14 hwy mpg and didn't perform worth a hoot. Both interiors were barely acceptable. Poor fit & finish. I think the latest version Ram has a lot nicer interior but still has MDS (I think). No more Rams for me.
So you got worse mileage with the MDS function? I think it can be turned off but that remains to be seen. Also, Dodge does not have Ford's reputation for reliability. Also, also, the Ford 6 speed has much nicer gear choices for highway running.

Ford if you are watching please publish a torque curve for the new 5.0 . . .

Greg
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
bluegreenf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
STX does not have EB so STX buyers won't have to worry about the cost of EcoBoost.

If I'm buying a FX4, CC XLT 4x4, Lariat, KR, Platinum I do not have the choice of the entry level V6. So the choice will be do you go with the standard 5.0 or add EcoBoost for $750.? Adding EcoBoost will be a no brainer to me. $750 is nothing. You'll make that back in gas savings.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #14  
Dunesgirl's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by bluegreenf150
STX does not have EB so STX buyers won't have to worry about the cost of EcoBoost.

If I'm buying a FX4, CC XLT 4x4, Lariat, KR, Platinum I do not have the choice of the entry level V6. So the choice will be do you go with the standard 5.0 or add EcoBoost for $750.? Adding EcoBoost will be a no brainer to me. $750 is nothing. You'll make that back in gas savings.
Where did you hear that the STX will not be available with the EB?

AFAIK, every trim level (save for the Lariat Limited, Harley Davidson, and Raptor) will have an EB option; as well as every configuration except for a regular cab shortbed.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Dunesgirl
Where did you hear that the STX will not be available with the EB?
If you go to the Ford F150 web site, then compare models like the XL and STX you will see that the EB is available on the XL but not the STX. It's a shame because I'd like an STX with the EB engine.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.