2009 - 2014 F-150

2011 F250 6.2L = 14mpg!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #16  
ommegang's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by tbowman053
WTF???? just as quick as an f150? Thats kinda embarressing for Ford considering stock for stock or equal mods, 5.7l hemi and 6.0l vortecs will makes fords 5.4l and now looking like the 6.2l as well, look stupid!
I'm curious, if Chevy offers the 6.2L in it's 1500s, ?, and Dodge offers the 5.7L, in it's 1500s, then why do all of you choose the F150's relatively underpowered 5.4L? Durability? Personally, I would want the HP. Just curious, no offense intended. Personally, I grew-up in an Olds dealership and was thus, anti-Ford. But, I now prefer Ford. Mind you, I didn't even bother to test-drive or even browse Dodge or Chevy.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #17  
Maxout05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: Ny
what did you pay for your 2011 out the door?
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 06:09 PM
  #18  
Barritia's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
They ain't bad prices. I looked at some in the dealership and fully loaded models ain't much more than a fully loaded f150. Way too big of a truck for what I tow 7k Lbs. Ain't seen one on the road around this area yet but I'm sure it won't be long. Seems f150's have taken a chunk of the f250 market with the increased capacities.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #19  
CometFlash's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
From: MA
I was just starting to feel like I was perhaps beginning to see the new 2008 SD models on a semi-regular basis, and then they went and did the 2011 SD. I've seen one so far. I think it shows how much the overall truck market has shrunk. In the past it would take like 6-8 months to get used to seeing a newer design all over the place. And I'm only just now feeling like the '08-style SD is becoming commonplace. I'm also feeling like the '09-style 150 is starting to become commonplace, at least for models like XLT/FX4/Lariat.

I suppose this feeling will become the norm, as there is no sign of the ecomony creating jobs for the forseeable future and the bmarket for big vehicles remaining mostly just to those who need them nowadays, not those who just want them, like myself. Throw in the 3-year cycle FMC is pursuing now and it increases that perception even more.

As an aside, those big chrome grille's seem even bigger on those SD's when you walk by them on the dealer lots. Very cool. Unfortunately, the rest of the vehicle appears virtually identical to the past several iterations of the SD. It's as if they change the front clip, and then leave the rest the same boring flat panel design it's been forever. They don't even try to add any new crease lines, tailights, anything. I don't get it. Maybe the SD just doesn't sell/cater to the demographic that cares about styling, like the 150 demographic does.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #20  
Nolasalt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Ponchatoula, LA
Originally Posted by bluetoy
I get about 18.6 mpg with my 09 Screw 4x4 5.4L. 3.55 gears. I don't have over 400 hp though

How many miles do you have on it? Has the MPG gotten better over time? I've got almost 2,000 miles on mine & I'm getting about 15.7 & I drive conservatively. Same set up as you...Screw 4x4 5.4L 3.55's.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 07:45 PM
  #21  
D8Chumley's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Oaks PA
Originally Posted by Nolasalt
How many miles do you have on it? Has the MPG gotten better over time? I've got almost 2,000 miles on mine & I'm getting about 15.7 & I drive conservatively. Same set up as you...Screw 4x4 5.4L 3.55's.
I'm around that mixed driving- mid 15's. I've gotten up to mid to upper 17s with mostly hiway with 3500 mi on it. Screw 4x4 5.4 with 3.55s. Hopefully it keeps climbing but thats already 3 mpg better (mixed) than I got with my old 6.0L diesel
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 09:50 PM
  #22  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Someone's trying to bash the 150's lately.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 10:12 PM
  #23  
Maxout05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Originally Posted by MTM Ford
Someone's trying to bash the 150's lately.
Exactly why i asked how much he paid. Cause a difference even $2,500 between his f250 with the 6.2 and mine with the apparent tiny 4.6 3v to me is a total waste of money for me to spend that kind of extra money so i can smoke a pos dodge ram at a traffic light.

My other question TO THE OP is why are you posting in the 2009-2011 f-150 forum about your 2011 f250?? Especially when your bashing the very vehicle this forum is about. F150 ONLINE.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 04:47 AM
  #24  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
He's posted this in 3 or 4 threads all over the board.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #25  
svt2205's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: Sunapee, NH
Originally Posted by ommegang
I'm curious, if Chevy offers the 6.2L in it's 1500s, ?, and Dodge offers the 5.7L, in it's 1500s, then why do all of you choose the F150's relatively underpowered 5.4L? Durability? Personally, I would want the HP. Just curious, no offense intended. Personally, I grew-up in an Olds dealership and was thus, anti-Ford. But, I now prefer Ford. Mind you, I didn't even bother to test-drive or even browse Dodge or Chevy.
Why do you need to keep asking this? Once is enough.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.