2009 - 2014 F-150

6.2 L official numbers out

Old Dec 5, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #76  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by SoonerTruck
Well I wouldn't call it not a "value" car necessarily as you get a lot for the price, but they aren't meant to compete with the rest of the Taurus' competitors. They are aimed at the people driving 5-series BMW's, Pontiac G8's, Maximas, etc. You get a sport sedan with a nicer appearance and nicer interior. Not a bad value, but if they keep going up in price they will price themselves out of the market. I had a 91 SHO and loved that thing despite it being a Taurus. I outran many stock 5.0 Stangs with it, all with air-lumbar/side bolsters, premium sound, and a Yamaha v6!
All your credibility gets thrown out the window when you group a Nissan Maxima and a Pontiac G6 in the same section.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #77  
SoonerTruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,230
Likes: 21
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Originally Posted by JBMX928
All your credibility gets thrown out the window when you group a Nissan Maxima and a Pontiac G6 in the same section.
I didn't, I compared a Maxima and Pontiac G8. They are both luxury sports sedans with 300HP or more. G8 is faster than the Maxima, but the Maxima is nicer inside. both have nice interiors and good handling. The SHO fits in with the G8 HP-wise, hopefully it matches the Maxima in quality.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #78  
desratt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: pioche, nv
it surpases
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #79  
TX Chris's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
This might be a repost, but here goes:

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/20/r...ng-also-get-e/
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.