2009 - 2014 F-150

Is it safe to run a programmer for a long period of time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #16  
slimcubby's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Darnell@Hypertech
Not that it's an 09 F-150 or anything, but we had a guy in here the other day with a 2007.5 Duramax with over 300k miles of towing heavy loads with 200k of those have been with Hypertech tuning. My 04 Lightning has 90K very hard miles and I've been programmed for the last 80K or so.

PS There is no reason to wait to program your vehicle it's totaly safe to program from day one. If you're interested in learning about the steps we took to program the 2009 F-150 and the testing we do please checkout http://www.hypertech.com/2009F150/
Link just hangs for me
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #17  
Darnell@Hypertech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by slimcubby
Link just hangs for me
Try it again I got emails from our host that there were some problems with our server last night. We're promised 99% up time I guess last night was that 1 percent they were talking about
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #18  
slimcubby's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Darnell@Hypertech
Try it again I got emails from our host that there were some problems with our server last night. We're promised 99% up time I guess last night was that 1 percent they were talking about
Haha ok cool now it works. Nice looks pretty good I have heard good things about both Hypertech and Edge. Are there any differences between the two besides the Edge mounting on the dash? Which isn't a big deal for me at all.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2009 | 12:51 PM
  #19  
yetti96's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL
No experience with hypertech so I am not saying anything bad but is it me or does anyone else think it is odd that the regular and premium tunes are nearly identical (1 HP and 0 ft-lbs) different. I would assume the premium could eek out some more power.
I know when I go from my 87 tow tune to my 93 performance tune on my gryphon I feel a considerable difference in how the power is applied, so I assumed it might be a little different.

Interesting to look into though. I would have a hard time giving up my gauges as I have become so used to having them there and knowing exactly what my truck is doing and feeling.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #20  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
?

Originally Posted by Bluejay
My truck has over 88,000 miles on it and about 58,000 are with an Edge/Gryphon. Unless you abuse the truck, the tranny should last even longer. If you abuse it, race it, or whatever, that is not the programmer causing the problem.
like bj said- i am ready to turn 160,000 hard worked miles on my troyer tuned 04 e250 van-ZERO ISSUES
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #21  
Darnell@Hypertech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by yetti96
No experience with hypertech so I am not saying anything bad but is it me or does anyone else think it is odd that the regular and premium tunes are nearly identical (1 HP and 0 ft-lbs) different. I would assume the premium could eek out some more power.
I know when I go from my 87 tow tune to my 93 performance tune on my gryphon I feel a considerable difference in how the power is applied, so I assumed it might be a little different.

Interesting to look into though. I would have a hard time giving up my gauges as I have become so used to having them there and knowing exactly what my truck is doing and feeling.
Yetti96,

It really depends on the application, there are some vehicles where there is a greater difference in power between the regular and premium fuel tunes. For example the 08 4.7L Dodge Rams there is a 8 HP & 9 TQ difference between the regular and premium fuel tunes. On the 2004 F-150 there is a 5 HP & 3 TQ difference between regular and premium fuel. So as you can see it really varies by application. The good thing about the tunes for the 09 being so close is that you can run regular fuel and be close to maximum power.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 09:10 PM
  #22  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
difference is comparing canned tunes to custom tunes-i'd bet the deed to my house-be it vmp , troyer or php, there is a SIGNIFICANT difference in gaions between 87 and 91 octane tunes...
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #23  
Darnell@Hypertech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by openclasspro#11
difference is comparing canned tunes to custom tunes-i'd bet the deed to my house-be it vmp , troyer or php, there is a SIGNIFICANT difference in gaions between 87 and 91 octane tunes...
Openclasspro,

There may be a significant difference between their gains for regular and premium fuels, but then I would suspect that their regular fuel tunes are not really optimized.

One thing Hypertech discovered while tuning the 5.4 3 valve in the 09 F-150 was the power the motor made was not limited by 87 octane. Now if the motor had an extra point of compression I'm sure you would see a huge difference in gains between the regular and premium fuel tunes. But that's not the case. The fact is you can get a 35 HP & 42 Ft-Lbs TQ increase all while running 87 octane with Hypertech's Max Energy.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #24  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
compression is the same as the 04-08's
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #25  
Barritia's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Darnell@Hypertech
Openclasspro,

There may be a significant difference between their gains for regular and premium fuels, but then I would suspect that their regular fuel tunes are not really optimized.

One thing Hypertech discovered while tuning the 5.4 3 valve in the 09 F-150 was the power the motor made was not limited by 87 octane. Now if the motor had an extra point of compression I'm sure you would see a huge difference in gains between the regular and premium fuel tunes. But that's not the case. The fact is you can get a 35 HP & 42 Ft-Lbs TQ increase all while running 87 octane with Hypertech's Max Energy.
Wow 35hp and 42ft-lbs is a great improvement. Is there any settings for better MPG for when we dont want the extra power?
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 03:32 AM
  #26  
slimcubby's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Barritia
Wow 35hp and 42ft-lbs is a great improvement. Is there any settings for better MPG for when we dont want the extra power?
Yea I too would like to know what setting would you need to be on to get better MPG and still a few gains.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #27  
lxtac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Middle Ga
http://www.hypertech.com/2009F150/
I think reason #5 is neet.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #28  
Darnell@Hypertech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Barritia
Wow 35hp and 42ft-lbs is a great improvement. Is there any settings for better MPG for when we dont want the extra power?
There isn't a special fuel economy setting, but with the increased throttle response combined with the extra power you should be able to use less throttle than stock which should lead to a nice gain in fuel economy. This is really a good all around tune, no need to switch between different one. Just program it and go.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #29  
yetti96's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL
I am being as nice as possible, I just don't buy the hype. I am thankful for Hypertech's support as a vendor, but the promises and dyno results still make me skeptical, that's all. The no increase of power to go from 87 to 93 seems a bit odd to me. I still think everyone needs to do their own research and find what is best for them. Personally, I don't have an '09 but if I did I would be speaking to Bill and Corey at PHP and wait. Like I said, being nice and not negative is hard to do when you respectfully disagree so take my $0.02 for what they are worth.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #30  
Darnell@Hypertech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by yetti96
I am being as nice as possible, I just don't buy the hype. I am thankful for Hypertech's support as a vendor, but the promises and dyno results still make me skeptical, that's all. The no increase of power to go from 87 to 93 seems a bit odd to me. I still think everyone needs to do their own research and find what is best for them. Personally, I don't have an '09 but if I did I would be speaking to Bill and Corey at PHP and wait. Like I said, being nice and not negative is hard to do when you respectfully disagree so take my $0.02 for what they are worth.
Yetti96,

Since the regular octane fuel isn't what limits the power going to a higher octane premium fuel doesn't have the same affect as what you're expecting. And I must say that I agree with you when you say that everyone should do their own research, that is why Hypertech's products are backed by a 30 day money back guarantee. That way you can test out the programmer and see how it fits your needs.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.