2009 - 2014 F-150

To K&N or Not!!!!! Your Thoughts!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #1  
smkeater's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: NJ near the shore,ok not really
To K&N or Not!!!!! Your Thoughts!!

I ve used K&N air filters on my last 2 F150's 02 and 06, it seemed to solve the choke point I had with the the 2 trucks when you kicked em in the @#$ getting on the highway etc. I havent noticed the 09 doing this when accelerating to pass or getting on the highway. Is it worth the money for the 09 or just leave it stock? What your opinion?
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #2  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
After looking at some test results I saw on the net some years ago, I would never use a K&N. The test showed the amount of dirt the filter, straight out of the box, allowed to pass through. Much worse with the K&N than with a paper filter.
And that doesn't include problems caused by after cleaning the filter if it is over oiled.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #3  
smkeater's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: NJ near the shore,ok not really
Originally Posted by kingfish51
After looking at some test results I saw on the net some years ago, I would never use a K&N. The test showed the amount of dirt the filter, straight out of the box, allowed to pass through. Much worse with the K&N than with a paper filter.
And that doesn't include problems caused by after cleaning the filter if it is over oiled.
I guess shame on me I was one for never read any test data!!!! I guess I was doing more harm than good to the motors when using them. Any alternatives to stock filters or just keep the stock/
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
mxracer49's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by kingfish51
After looking at some test results I saw on the net some years ago, I would never use a K&N. The test showed the amount of dirt the filter, straight out of the box, allowed to pass through. Much worse with the K&N than with a paper filter.
And that doesn't include problems caused by after cleaning the filter if it is over oiled.
A buddy of mine with a 5.7 put one in. It dirtied up the MAF so bad his truck wouldn't get out of it's own way. User error? Maybe. I know I won't be using an oiled filter with MAFs.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #5  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I've been perfectly happy with my K&N dropin for 86,000 miles. Saves money on filter replacement. Truck does not use oil and never had an MAF problem. You just need to be able to follow directions when reoiling. I clean it about evert 20,000 miles.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #6  
BIG_ole_TRUCK's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
I looked at the air intake system yesterday as I checked the oil level. There's plenty of baffles occupying a lot of space but I suppose it's there for a purpose (making sure laminar air flow occurs into the manifold). The oil saturated air filters are not for my liking. It's too bad Ford doesn't provide performance parts for it's trucks like GM does for Chevy and GMC. Overall, I'm reluctant to change the OEM air intake system at this point.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 09:48 AM
  #7  
fordmaster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
I looked at K&N test data as well AND suggestions on here. I went with an Amsoil EaA filter. I know the nanofiber technology is the latest and it filters better than oiled gauze and standard paper. Plus it is cheaper now and in the long run. No brainer for me.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 15, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #8  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I had the K&N for about 85,000 and finally made the mod to enlarge the intake openning as shown in the How To section. I have about 1500 miles since doing that. Since I have a custom tune, the extra air is noticeable.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 12:50 PM
  #9  
Power Kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
I've read the negative K&N results with thier cold air intakes, but not with their drop in factory replacment. A key difference.

I use a K&N as I can clean em and reuse. Overall much cheaper. Never had a prblem over last 15 years.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #10  
Showya's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
I ran K&N until AEM hit the market in 2001. Never looked back, now over 190,xxx and not single issue.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 04:00 AM
  #11  
Tylus's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 2
From: Pearl Harbor
I use K&N on Carb'd vehicles. No question. They flow more, and with my carb'd motors, I care more about HP/TQ than I do with motor longevity.


on a EFI motor, no way in hell I'd use a K&N. I did once way back when on a 1995 Mustang....up until I found dirt on the motor side of the filter.

The K&N filter just doesn't do a good enough job of filtering. It's just a filter with lots of big holes...too much grit/crap gets through.



And then you have to worry about the oil on the filter messing with the MAF and IAT (if present)




highly recommend a good paper filter
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #12  
The Boz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Land of Corn and Huskers
I had considered buying a K&N until I read some reviews like this. I decided to go with an Airaid CAI. So far it seems to work fine.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #13  
L8 APEX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: Lone Star State
It depends on the operating conditions. Clean city air maybe. Rural or off road, not so much. It gives the dealer ammo to deny power train claims. K&N's have to e oiled to work. Too much oil and it gets on the MAF hot wire element and burns it up. This is real common on GM. GM techs have a bulletin they give every customer with a K&N stating Gm will not warranty any MAF issues. Also more air means more dirt unless you drastically increase the size of the filter. If you trade in every 100k it probably doesn't matter. If you live on a farm and want to go 300k and ten years you will want to stay stock. Donaldson is a good mil spec filter company. I have also used AFE 7 layer stuff on diesels.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #14  
smkeater's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: NJ near the shore,ok not really
I do a lot of highway driving and where I work there is nothing but dust and dirt. After the comments I guess i will stick with stock filter for now till I do some research. Thanks all
 
Reply
Old May 21, 2009 | 01:13 AM
  #15  
JmG F150's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi
i bought my airaid CAI when i was at 32k and im now at 61k and its ran SO much stronger...the bigger throttle body helps too :-)
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 AM.