These are real numbers? That's pathetic! They could have bolted on the Shelby's 4 valve heads and had 380 HP easy, with over 400 FT LBS. Oh well, I guess the '09 owners will have to put up with a few more years of being shut down by the Tundra guys.

 

Nope, but it does sound like you could use a bit more intelligence. I can barely read your posts the grammar is so bad. Go back to school and than buy a truck.

 

Then.

 

No I dont need a different vehicle I need ford to get off there a$$ and build a f-150 that has atleast the same HP as the other trucks out there! Oh and buy the way it's 380 and 381 HP for the dodge and toyota get your facts stright. And yes WOW!!! it is a big deal to some people. I didn't buy my truck to race either but it sure would be nice to be able to keep a dodge or toyota in site if I was to want to race them. And I know ALOT of people that drive GMs, toyotas, dodges that go out and tow that much EVERYDAY and can still haul a$$ after the day is over!

 

If you cant read my post and understand it well your the one with the problem. And I didn't know this was english class.........

 

I didn't buy my truck to race either, but when I am towing my 8,500lbs trailer, I like to be able to merge into traffic with a little more gussto. If you don't want to be abel to do that, fine you should be happy now.

Fords tow rating is only tops with a Reg cab HD version. On a Screw with 18/20" wheels its only what 8,800. GM is 10,500 and Toyota not sure over 10 anyway....

 

Some people on here think they know there a$$ from a hole in the ground....But they don't

 

Stealth, don't make me get on your grammar.

Sounds like you.

 

Ha.

 

I have forgot more about ford truck than you will ever know.....

 

What?

 

you're correct, my mistake and I apologize for the harsh criticism

i made the presumption that the ecoboost options, available in 2010, would include a more powerful engine (the 6.2L being the likely big engine option) since everything else has played out pretty much according to what the more knowledgeable guys (derek,et al) have insinuated so far, and automakers rarely step backwards in the power department with a new engine lineup

i don't apologize for this though: there is a lot of whining over an unknown here--even with the info 'from the horse's mouth' that new engines are coming in 2010...i realize i don't have to read the whiner threads, but give us a break--you have real-world options, exercise them...

all this being said, it wouldn't surprise me if the 6.2L isn't an option in 2010, as ford seems to be taking a proactive approach to engine design with smaller displacement engines making more power per volume...

 

Exactly, my point. I think drugs played a major factor in the decay of this guy's brain cells.

 

Man, You guys are THICK!!! Let me take you back a few posts sense you cant keep up...... I said "Some people on here think they know there a$$ from a hole in the ground....But they don't" ....Then ThumperMX113 said ''Sounds like you'' Then I said ''I have forgot more about ford truck than you will ever know.....'' Then you said ''What" Now are you up to date?? Try to keep up......

 

Here's what Igor had to say about this. He has been correct on a lot of things and Dearborn Derek backed him up at the time this was posted. 2009 1/2 or 2010. Take your pick.