Throttle body gasket/restrictor?
Throttle body gasket/restrictor?
I was hoping someone could tell me the purpose of the very obstructive appearing throttle body gasket on my 2007 4.6 motor.
I had the throttle body off for cleaning the other day and it appears the gasket itself is very large and has a mesh system built into it that situates itself directly in the air intake tract.
What is the purpose of this screen design?
Has anyone ever tried trimming the screen portion off while keeping the gasket portion that seals the tb to truth upper plenum?
I'm sure it has a purpose but I've already addressed one bottleneck with the gotts mod, could this be another?
I had the throttle body off for cleaning the other day and it appears the gasket itself is very large and has a mesh system built into it that situates itself directly in the air intake tract.
What is the purpose of this screen design?
Has anyone ever tried trimming the screen portion off while keeping the gasket portion that seals the tb to truth upper plenum?
I'm sure it has a purpose but I've already addressed one bottleneck with the gotts mod, could this be another?
Can you post a pick? I removed my throttle body a while back and do not remember that.
x2
x2
How is it the stock intake has no bottleneck when the factory snorkel is a smaller diameter than that of the throttle body itself.
1) Bernoulli's Principle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle )
2) The engine requires LESS cfm @ max rpm than the Stock intake (including the snorkel section) can supply ( https://www.f150online.com/forums/4739726-post9.html ) ...
So - it *may* appear to be a bottleneck IF cfm demands were exceeded, but they're not, so the term is irrelevant.... especially on a 4.6L
Last edited by MGDfan; May 29, 2012 at 11:23 AM.
It's kind of like putting a Holley 850 carb on a Ford 302. Due to volumetric efficiency, there's no way to make use of anything over 600cfm in stock form (i.e. no intake work/head work/forced induction/etc). The stock intake can handle the intake needs of the factory engine. Aftermarket intakes due not generally produce any meaningful amount of power without additional mods to take advantage of it, and can cause a lean condition.
Trending Topics
Two reasons:
1) Bernoulli's Principle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle )
2) The engine requires LESS cfm @ max rpm than the Stock intake (including the snorkel section) can supply ( https://www.f150online.com/forums/4739726-post9.html ) ...
So - it *may* appear to be a bottleneck IF cfm demands were exceeded, but they're not, so the term is irrelevant.... especially on a 4.6L
1) Bernoulli's Principle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle )
2) The engine requires LESS cfm @ max rpm than the Stock intake (including the snorkel section) can supply ( https://www.f150online.com/forums/4739726-post9.html ) ...
So - it *may* appear to be a bottleneck IF cfm demands were exceeded, but they're not, so the term is irrelevant.... especially on a 4.6L
I was somewhat surprised to see our VE for a 3 valve motor rated at 85 percent though.
I have done forced induction calculations in the past for dual cam 16 valve four cylinders and used similar numbers.
Thank you for the intelligent response and the links, I am learning here and alot of that comes from responses like yours.
JK





