First tank of e85
First tank of e85
I traveled a bit in Minnesota this past weekend, and since e85 is available an many gas stations I filled up a tank full at $2.09/gallon. I was within 20 miles of the low fuel light coming on, so I got a good 25 gallons in. Before I filled up I was running about 16mpg with the bikes racks on the front and back. My e85 tank dropped right down to 12mpg.
I get better then 12mpg with short local city driving in the dead of winter.
I get better then 12mpg with short local city driving in the dead of winter.
Last edited by greencrew; Jun 4, 2010 at 12:57 AM.
That's an expensive fill up. Over $5200! I filled up the other day and it cut me off at $100. 
I think most people have come to the conclusion that it currently isn't worth the investment. If the price becomes cheaper at the pump, the savings could play out. Currently, it costs cheaper than regular gas by the gallon, but costs more by the mile.
I would like to see someone run about 4 consecutive tanks through one, then report back. I'm sure there is an adjustment period for the computer after switching gas. It may not be as good as regular gasoline, but the drop off may not be as significant on the 3rd and 4th tanks.
Trending Topics
E85 is a joke, currently, with the way America produces it (primarily with corn) it takes something like 4.5 gallons of diesel fuel to create one gallon of E85. Now if we made it using very low maintainence crops like suger cane, like they do in brazil, the fuel required to make it would go down, and the price itself would drop, therefore possilbly making it cheaper by the mile.
As a Minnesota resident, I tried it in my 2007 for about 1.5 tankfuls, only because it was my first E85-capable vehicle. I tried it, mileage sucked, and I'm back to gasoline.
pa_wolf62 is correct that E85 has only about 75% of the energy of unleaded gas, so that's why your mileage was reduced. So it's only financially worthwhile if the cost is 75% of gasoline or less. However, the true cost of the E85 is actually much higher than the price at the pump, because E85 is heavily subsidized by the state. Of course, some people will consider other factors (environmental, foreign dependency, help farmers, etc.) in deciding whether to use E85. I just don't happen to be one of them. The real beneficiaries of E85 are shareholders of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).
pa_wolf62 is correct that E85 has only about 75% of the energy of unleaded gas, so that's why your mileage was reduced. So it's only financially worthwhile if the cost is 75% of gasoline or less. However, the true cost of the E85 is actually much higher than the price at the pump, because E85 is heavily subsidized by the state. Of course, some people will consider other factors (environmental, foreign dependency, help farmers, etc.) in deciding whether to use E85. I just don't happen to be one of them. The real beneficiaries of E85 are shareholders of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).
Yup, anything with an engine built to run 11:1 compression or more probably love the cheap fuel.
It's not that, the problem is that the compression ratio on gas engines is too low to make good power and mileage on E85. I've seen a couple tests that showed engines with bumped up compression making more power and mileage with E85 than they did on gas.
As a Minnesota resident, I tried it in my 2007 for about 1.5 tankfuls, only because it was my first E85-capable vehicle. I tried it, mileage sucked, and I'm back to gasoline.
pa_wolf62 is correct that E85 has only about 75% of the energy of unleaded gas, so that's why your mileage was reduced. So it's only financially worthwhile if the cost is 75% of gasoline or less. However, the true cost of the E85 is actually much higher than the price at the pump, because E85 is heavily subsidized by the state. Of course, some people will consider other factors (environmental, foreign dependency, help farmers, etc.) in deciding whether to use E85. I just don't happen to be one of them. The real beneficiaries of E85 are shareholders of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).
pa_wolf62 is correct that E85 has only about 75% of the energy of unleaded gas, so that's why your mileage was reduced. So it's only financially worthwhile if the cost is 75% of gasoline or less. However, the true cost of the E85 is actually much higher than the price at the pump, because E85 is heavily subsidized by the state. Of course, some people will consider other factors (environmental, foreign dependency, help farmers, etc.) in deciding whether to use E85. I just don't happen to be one of them. The real beneficiaries of E85 are shareholders of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).









