2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Travel Stats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #16  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 04 RED LARIAT
O O O I wanna play too.
Do you want the back or front? I'll take anything I can get.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #17  
bushtree's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
Phoenix it california is a lot more than 2hrs drive...

Plus this time a year it would be likely. It is thanksgiving weekend, one of the biggest weekends for people to go to the desert. When i was driving home across the 8 on wensday im sure i saw over 100 trucks towing on my 5 hour drive. There is expected to be over 500,000 people at the imperial sand dunes this weekend (Glamis, gordons wells, buttercup)
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #18  
allrsdup's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
From: farmingville, ny
Originally Posted by SilverScab 5.5
I dont understand this post. The trucks listed are basically ranked in the numbers they sell. Ford selling the most, Chevy the second, Dodge the third etc etc. As a result it would make since that the number of vehicles seen towing would follow these trends. Does not really make one better than the other. Also the Honda Ridgeline is a decent vehicle and is definately a truck, using a hybrid ladder/unibody frame it is way more ridgid and solid than any full ladder frame truck but not as strong. It is still a very capable tow vehicle. Unfortunately it has a very polarizing design that is love or hate and I must admit I hate.
a unibody is by far less rigid then a full frame rail. unibody is what mustangs have and u need to add frame conectors to them to make it rigid enough to handle any sort of horsepower. a unibody is garbage for a truck.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #19  
SilverScab 5.5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by allrsdup
a unibody is by far less rigid then a full frame rail. unibody is what mustangs have and u need to add frame conectors to them to make it rigid enough to handle any sort of horsepower. a unibody is garbage for a truck.
As I said before, a unibody is not as strong as a latter frame but it is definately more ridgid. The reason being is that load forces from the suspension, body, etc. have more area to dissipate. In a unibody vehicle these forces are transferrred through the floorpan into the pillars and into the roof. Making all of these components strong is what makes a very ridgid platform. A Mustang is not the best example because it is not the most ridgid vehicle. By contrast, in a ladder frame vehicle all the load forces are supported by the two frame rails. This is most evident when you watch your rear view mirror while driving and can see the bed moving seperatly from the cab. Granted some of this motion is the rubber cab mounts, but some is also frame flex. In a very sturdy unibody car, (the new 3 series BMW being the benchmark IMHO) you do not get these kinds of motions in the vehicle and it is a much more solid ride especially in demanding situations such as hard cornering or rough roads. You are definately correct, not all unibody cars are created equal the same way not all truck frames are created equal. So in a vehicle such as the Mustang where the unibody is not a strong as it should be frame connectors are necessary. Others they would not be. Just remember strength and ridgity are not the same. A ladder frame definately provides more strength and a greater ability to haul and tow. This is why trucks use this system. It only compromises body ridgity. I only think it was clever of Honda to marry the two systems into one. Using a light ladder frame and suplementing it with a strong unibody. This would never work on a three quarter ton or larger vehicle but for a midsize truck it makes excellent sense.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #20  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SilverScab 5.5
As I said before, a unibody is not as strong as a latter frame but it is definately more ridgid. The reason being is that load forces from the suspension, body, etc. have more area to dissipate. In a unibody vehicle these forces are transferrred through the floorpan into the pillars and into the roof. Making all of these components strong is what makes a very ridgid platform. A Mustang is not the best example because it is not the most ridgid vehicle. By contrast, in a ladder frame vehicle all the load forces are supported by the two frame rails. This is most evident when you watch your rear view mirror while driving and can see the bed moving seperatly from the cab. Granted some of this motion is the rubber cab mounts, but some is also frame flex. In a very sturdy unibody car, (the new 3 series BMW being the benchmark IMHO) you do not get these kinds of motions in the vehicle and it is a much more solid ride especially in demanding situations such as hard cornering or rough roads. You are definately correct, not all unibody cars are created equal the same way not all truck frames are created equal. So in a vehicle such as the Mustang where the unibody is not a strong as it should be frame connectors are necessary. Others they would not be. Just remember strength and ridgity are not the same. A ladder frame definately provides more strength and a greater ability to haul and tow. This is why trucks use this system. It only compromises body ridgity. I only think it was clever of Honda to marry the two systems into one. Using a light ladder frame and suplementing it with a strong unibody. This would never work on a three quarter ton or larger vehicle but for a midsize truck it makes excellent sense.
Sounds good when you type it out, doesn't it?

I think you should visit 'their' forums. Does anyone remember the guy who bent his uni-body trying to forge some baby ditch. .
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #21  
SilverScab 5.5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Sounds good when you type it out, doesn't it?

I think you should visit 'their' forums. Does anyone remember the guy who bent his uni-body trying to forge some baby ditch. .

This is where the flex of a ladder frame comes into play. This is why I have been saying the ladder frame setup is definately stronger. A ridgid unibody under extreme torsional twist will bend. A ladder frame under the same torsional twist will flex and return to it's shape. I am sure it was more than a baby ditch. My whole point to all this is that a Ridgeline will statisfy most people that don't do extreme hauling or off roading. It will easily and reliably pull a 5000 pound trailer. It also provides a far better driving expierience than any truck I have driven. It is a great idea that needs better styling. For me, I needed a more heavy duty truck so I bought the F150. It was definately a ride and handling tradeoff coming from the cars I have owned before but it fullfills my needs perfectly. The fact that it looks stunning is just icing on the cake.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #22  
SilverScab 5.5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Also a slightly modified Ridgeline completed the BAJA 1000. Definately worth noting.

the official Baja results:

STOCK MINI (Stock, mini trucks)—1. Dan Fresh, San Juan Capistrano, Calif./Sean Douglass/Dale Godges, Irvine, Calif., Mitsubishi Raider, 34:36:44 (30.27mph); 2. Rod Millen (New Zealand)/Ryan Millen, Newport Beach, Calif., Toyota FJ Cruiser, 34:37:18; 3. Rod Hall, Reno, Nev./Emily Miller, Crested Butte, Colo./Mike Winkel, Reno, Nev., Hummer H3, 36:37:17; 4. Gavin Skilton, Orange, Calif./Kevin Jensen, Apple Valley, Calif./Clive Skilton, Orange, Calif., Honda Ridgeline, 42:51:25. (6 Starters, 4 Finishers)
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #23  
masterd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
You know us So-Cal people. Holiday weekend = tow all the toys to the desert and spend the weekend. Did some off road stuff myself.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 11:48 PM
  #24  
04 RED LARIAT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 1
From: Ky/Va Mountains
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Do you want the back or front? I'll take anything I can get.
Hell, I have cleaned up before. Just anywhere I can get in. What was we talking about again?
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #25  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 04 RED LARIAT
Hell, I have cleaned up before. Just anywhere I can get in. What was we talking about again?
I forgot!
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #26  
TTSaleen's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by SilverScab 5.5
This is where the flex of a ladder frame comes into play. This is why I have been saying the ladder frame setup is definately stronger. A ridgid unibody under extreme torsional twist will bend. A ladder frame under the same torsional twist will flex and return to it's shape. I am sure it was more than a baby ditch. My whole point to all this is that a Ridgeline will statisfy most people that don't do extreme hauling or off roading. It will easily and reliably pull a 5000 pound trailer. It also provides a far better driving expierience than any truck I have driven. It is a great idea that needs better styling. For me, I needed a more heavy duty truck so I bought the F150. It was definately a ride and handling tradeoff coming from the cars I have owned before but it fullfills my needs perfectly. The fact that it looks stunning is just icing on the cake.
Something is fishy here, you must be a salesmen for Honda? But you bought a ford? 2nd, knowone originally argued how good or bad the ridgeline was? Just the fact that none were seen towing a load during his drive. Sounds like your either a salesmen or someone who just wants to start an argument Your kind belongs in the Honda forums. It would be different if you were called out specifically but that's not what took place, so take your sales pitch elsewhere.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #27  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Wait, does anyone know when the Rize kit is coming out for the Ridgeline?
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:11 AM
  #28  
masterd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Let me clear the travel time up. Yes Phnx to Cali is a 4 and a half to 5 hour drive. I did a 1.5 hour sample.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #29  
TTSaleen's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Wait, does anyone know when the Rize kit is coming out for the Ridgeline?
I'm sure captain salesmen will clue us in on why the stock uni-body is better than rize for offroading...I'm so excited I've got my and ready...
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #30  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TTSaleen
I'm sure captain salesmen will clue us in on why the stock uni-body is better than rize for offroading...I'm so excited I've got my and ready...
I've had both all day, I knew something like this was going to happen!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.