2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

larger rims in the back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #16  
SnowmaNick
Guest
Posts: n/a
Just do a 2" drop shackle. It keeps the front at stock height and gets rid of the **** in the air.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #17  
quackrstackr's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by 01TruBluGT
OK Lets see if what I learned in first grade about reading, comprehension, and math can get us all on the same page here.

Reading: "has anyone tried putting 18's in the front and 20's in the back...or a 20 & 22 combo."

Comprehension: He is not asking about different width tires he is asking about different diameter wheels and tires. If it were a simple matter of width there would be no question as all you have to do is play with the sidewall size to make everything look right.

Math: Now Lets just say you take a truck that the rear is stock 2" higher than the front. It would work something like this

Front 0 Rear +2
Rim 18 Rim 18
Front 18 Rear 20

Here we still keep the rear 2" higher than the front. Now to my next demonstration

Front 0 Rear +2
Rim 18 Rim 20
Front 18 Rear 22

Now my fingers tell me that 22-18 is 4 so the rear would sit 4" higher than the front except that 1" of the rim would be above the axle and would be absorbed into the wheel well. If you wanted things to look right and kept the sidewall on both the front and rear tires as close to equal as possible. Now you could get around this by running a 60 series front tire and an 45 series rear tire. Bare in mind that on a 275/65/18 tire there is roughly 7" of sidewall on the tire, however on the 275/40/20 there would be only 5" of sidewall which would look a bit out of place.
Perhaps you should revisit your seventh grade geometry class. Your measurement to the center of the axle is exactly how much your ride height is going to increase. You stated as much in your figuring but you still say the rear will sit the entire addition higher. Not the case. The axle to frame is a fixed dimension so you have to take the addition to wheel diamter on the top side out of the equation.

The top of the tire, yes... the measurement to the bottom of the bumper, inside of wheel well, top of bed, whatever, no. Hence the rear will not sit 4" higher, it will sit 3 inches higher given the same sidewall on the different tires because that additional 1" is just absorbed into the wheel wells just like you stated.

If I had time, I would make you a very pretty illustration on this CAD box but I don't. Trust me on this one.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #18  
01TruBluGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 01TruBluGT
so the rear would sit 4" higher than the front except that 1" of the rim would be above the axle and would be absorbed into the wheel well.
Well I was using the 4" number as it was shown in my illustration. Didn't want to confuse people by throwing a 3 out there and them not knowing where it came from. You can see from my explination that though I forgot to say "It will sit 3" higher than the front" I clearly accounted for the 1" of rim that is left between the axle and wheel well which will not affect any height measurments.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #19  
Nates06SCab's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, Florida
I think the idea would only look right if you bagged it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #20  
red04f150$'s Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL
thanks everyone..I have removed this idea from my head...i am leaning towards the drop shakles in the rear.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #21  
PenguinFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Appearance-wise, it's not all that bad of an idea.

The ride quality would be kind of messed up.

No matter what the specific measurements would be, you'd have little rubber on the rear and more up front. That would make for a rather stiff ride on the rear... not very fun.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 PM.