2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

I think I found it...

Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
2005fx4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 1
From: bay area, ca
All this edge talk is really making me want to pull the trigger and try one of things. Guess I need to start looking for the best price
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #17  
inurok's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by Beefullo
I did a quick 0-60 and got a 7.20 on lvl 3. It's not the best in the world but I am hoping it will go down with a little more tinkering.

:
Hey a 7 second 0-60 is great for that truck. Not like you are gonna have lightning type quickness with any other tinkering. Have fun with you truck again!
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #18  
HardcoreHehaw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by RamSS/T
Actually I am running 93 octane but my AVG MPG went up from 13.1 to 17.2 (mix of city and highway driving). So basicaly a 25% increase in MPG and a 10% increase in cost per gallon.
I went from 12 to 15.5 on level 3. When I fill up it's an extra $6 for 93 but it saves me $20.50 per tank full.
So saving $14.50 everytime you fill up..... plus always having that extra power there when you need it is well worth 93 octane.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #19  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Beefullo
For me my truck is my baby.

I use the best wax.

I use the best oil.

I use the best brake pads.

Why wouldn't I use the best fuel?
Best fuel? The best fuel is what the engine burns the most efficiently, and the cleanest. Higher octane does not equal better fuel.

Anyway, I was just asking if the tunes were dependent on the octane. I won't pay the difference in fuel costs, for little to no gains in performance. Sorry, didn't mean to step on ego's.

joe
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #20  
Beefullo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Originally Posted by 02Thunder
Best fuel? The best fuel is what the engine burns the most efficiently, and the cleanest. Higher octane does not equal better fuel.

Anyway, I was just asking if the tunes were dependent on the octane. I won't pay the difference in fuel costs, for little to no gains in performance. Sorry, didn't mean to step on ego's.

joe
Little to no gains in performance? Did you not hear me say how night and day my truck is with this tuner compared to stock?
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #21  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Night and day is not a calculatable number. It is purely emotional, subjective, and not quantitative. Do you have dyno charts? Do you have timeslips from a track?

Look, I am not trying to be an ***. I am being objective. I have heard a lot of claims of exhaust, and filters, and tornados giving performance gains, and they are mostly in the minds of those that wrote the checks.

I am just asking for info...
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #22  
Beefullo's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Originally Posted by 02Thunder
Night and day is not a calculatable number. It is purely emotional, subjective, and not quantitative. Do you have dyno charts? Do you have timeslips from a track?

Look, I am not trying to be an ***. I am being objective. I have heard a lot of claims of exhaust, and filters, and tornados giving performance gains, and they are mostly in the minds of those that wrote the checks.

I am just asking for info...
http://www.edgeproducts.com/pdf/FordF-150Evolution3.pdf

There's a dyno, heh.

You could always look at the F150's normal 0-60 time of 9.12 and see that with better shifting and tuning I almost shaved off a whole two seconds. I installed an intake and exhaust on my old Bronco and yeah, I could tell a difference, but nothing like the difference this tuner made.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:39 PM
  #23  
RamSS/T's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Originally Posted by 02Thunder
Night and day is not a calculatable number. It is purely emotional, subjective, and not quantitative. Do you have dyno charts? Do you have timeslips from a track?

Look, I am not trying to be an ***. I am being objective. I have heard a lot of claims of exhaust, and filters, and tornados giving performance gains, and they are mostly in the minds of those that wrote the checks.

I am just asking for info...
Let me asure you the seat of the pants gain from a tune is nothing like the seat of pants gained from a airfilter. You can see (big black streaks left by the back tires...lets see a stock tuned truck smoke 24s!), feel (the truck just plain pulls MUCH harder), and hear (the truck sounds totaly different at both start and idle) a difference. But if you want numbers...how does 11.13 0-60 stock vs 7.16 (best....7.3s average) Level 3 tuned sound. I don't care who you are...you can but a 4 sec improvment is dramatic and something you can feel!
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #24  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Is that a manufacturers dyno claim for a 4.6 or a 5.4, heh?

Jesus, I feel like I am back in the Lightning forums...

Let me asure you the seat of the pants gain from a tune is nothing like the seat of pants gained from a airfilter. You can see (big black streaks left by the back tires...lets see a stock tuned truck smoke 24s!), feel (the truck just plain pulls MUCH harder), and hear (the truck sounds totaly different at both start and idle) a difference. But if you want numbers...how does 11.13 0-60 stock vs 7.16 (best....7.3s average) Level 3 tuned sound. I don't care who you are...you can but a 4 sec improvment is dramatic and something you can feel!
And that is at the expense of 93 octane, like I first asked? Yep.

You guys are way too emotional about your trucks. Relax a little, things will make more sense.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #25  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 02Thunder
And that is at the expense of 93 octane, like I first asked? Yep.
The expense of 93 octane? I calculated it out a while back and at the current gas prices around here, I was getting the same numbers with 93 octane but way better performance and not to mention its a cleaner gas.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #26  
sirshan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: Cali
So where can I get this? I havent logged into the forum in a while and here I am ready to buy something. Geeez...bad news. My truck is in the shop getting repaired from an accident, so why not buy it a treat for when it gets out!!!!!!!!!

Did you buy it directly from them? I like that it has a mount too.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #27  
gsb0824's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Just got an Edge EVO

Jsut purchased an '06 KR SCrew and did a little research before purchasing the Edge EVO. I have never had a tuner before and have never done any mods on any vehicle. Installation was very simple, programming was simple except for calculating my tire circumference. I have the optional 20' rims. After figuring that out, the rest was a piece of cake. Now my truck acts like a totally different truck. Performance gains were very noticable, towing is a lot easier, mpg went up, etc. Well worth the purchase and when I get a wild hair, I just program in level 3 and stomp the gas. The acceleration is almost astonishing compared to stock. Just hope its not bad for the engine.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #28  
05supercrew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,071
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Mine comes tomorrow, this is killing me.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #29  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I guess I have to see what SCT can do for me. Thanks everyone.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #30  
RamSS/T's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Originally Posted by 02Thunder



And that is at the expense of 93 octane, like I first asked? Yep.

You guys are way too emotional about your trucks. Relax a little, things will make more sense.
Did you read my first post to you about "the expense of 93 octane"? The increase in MPG more than makes up for the additional cost of Premium gas...HELLO! Maybe things will make sense to YOU if you would read all the posts before you comment.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.