2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

?300hp of 5.4 3valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #31  
Dunk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
The SRT version, at 6.1 liters, produces 425 net horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque -

425 bhp (318 kW) @ 6000 rpm, (69.8 bhp/L)
420 lb.-ft. (569 N•m) @ 4800 rpm

http://www.allpar.com/mopar/new-mopar-hemi.html


Looks like Mopars going to do it to Ford again. Don't know what good a 6000rpm engine will be in a truck. Even ther max torque rpm is wild.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #32  
04 ON 20'S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
My Truck Weighs 5300 pounds
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #33  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
The 04’s aren’t slower than previous model years. The 3-valve engine is a lot more powerful but it is tuned down from the factory. Believe me, once you re-tune them they fly.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #34  
hellbound F-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Originally posted by Serge
I still dont see why the 2004 should be slower then the last model f-150. Everyone likes to say "oh its just the extra weight". There must be more to it then that. After all, a guy in an earlier post put an extra 600 pounds in his truck and then raced against a 2004 and the 2004 still lost....i dont get it....maybe someone can actually tell me why and not just give me a theory. thanks
Were you racing apples to apples in vehicle configuration? When I was bone stock I raced a 2002 F150 just like mine in engine size, gearing and everything and I beat him so bad he was in my rear view....no $h!t
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #35  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
Originally posted by hellbound F-150
Were you racing apples to apples in vehicle configuration? When I was bone stock I raced a 2002 F150 just like mine in engine size, gearing and everything and I beat him so bad he was in my rear view....no $h!t
I ditto this comment because I did the same thing.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #36  
Big SCrew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, Md
Originally posted by Serge
I still dont see why the 2004 should be slower then the last model f-150. Everyone likes to say "oh its just the extra weight". There must be more to it then that. After all, a guy in an earlier post put an extra 600 pounds in his truck and then raced against a 2004 and the 2004 still lost....i dont get it....maybe someone can actually tell me why and not just give me a theory. thanks
Your question has been aswered plenty. The 04 is heavier and designed to perform like a truck, not a drag car. It can tow a house off it's foundation, and still pass with ease. After I put about 5000 miles on my truck, the engine "woke up". It is a lot quicker and launches much better. I can't imagine if I had the tuner, It would be a beast.

And the drive by wire has NO faults. The lag was put in by design. It gives a smoother drive (especially off road where someone can abuse the throttle) and better mpg. On bumpy terrain, the truck wont surge forward from foot movement.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #37  
Slow04's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Hickory
Originally posted by jpdadeo
The 04’s aren’t slower than previous model years. The 3-valve engine is a lot more powerful but it is tuned down from the factory. Believe me, once you re-tune them they fly.
By "re tune" do you mean reflashing the computer with like a Superchips programmer? If so I don't believe you,my truck doesn't come anywhere close to "flying"
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #38  
hellbound F-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, Florida
If that was meant the way I think it was....that is funny.

If my truck flew after the Superchips tuner, I'd call that a bargain.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #39  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
That’s exactly what I meant. Since I installed the Xcalibrator my truck has no throttle lag, downshifts instantly, goes open loop instantly, it really moves. It was a dog before.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #40  
treatcg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally posted by osbornk
I don't know why we're having this conversation. Dodge has never allowed anyone to outhorsepower them. Remember the little truck they sell with the V10 Viper engine it? They've done that since the Roadrunner. They take their cheapest lightest body and put in a big engine and sell it as performance. The handling and stopping may not be up to par but they will sure go straight.
Agreed and their gas mileage suck. My buddy at work as a new Hemi and bitches everyday about how bad his gas mileage is.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #41  
greggeo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Woodland Hills
Cool

I am one happy camper I decided to buy the 4.6, money was never an issue I paid cash for the truck, its a proven reliable engine and has more than enough get up and go.... as much or more than I'll ever need. I guess I'm the kind of person that doesn't sweat it if the truck next to me on the freeway or anywhere has the ability to walk away when the driver mashes the throttle.... for me there's more to life than speed.. my 2 cents

 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #42  
Ford Man Dan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
All I have to say is I got my 5.4L Lariat for 24,000 and I priced out a Hemi equivalent to what is in my truck and it costs 34,000 so Ill take that 10,000 difference and put mods on my truck that will blow by a hemi any day any where . You sometimes have to look at price to price comparisons and in my case, the hemi is pointless and over rated.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #43  
Serge's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Big screw, are you saying that the previous f-150 werent desinged to perform like a truck because that is what i was comparing the new f-150's too....
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #44  
Slow04's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Hickory
Originally posted by Ford Man Dan
All I have to say is I got my 5.4L Lariat for 24,000 and I priced out a Hemi equivalent to what is in my truck and it costs 34,000 so Ill take that 10,000 difference and put mods on my truck that will blow by a hemi any day any where . You sometimes have to look at price to price comparisons and in my case, the hemi is pointless and over rated.
sure bout them prices? Were you comparing 2wd to 4wd? Anyway my FX4 4x4 fully loaded ran closer to 36k in price.

Gregeo I hope you're staying in the right hand lane on the interstate my 2 cents was that this post is about the advertised hp not being there.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #45  
Badstang19912's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: St Petersburg, FL
Damn I only paid 19.5k for my 04 extended cab xlt. And that included bedliner, bugshiled, vent visors, my gibson exhaust and delphi satelite radio.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.