2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Magnaflow of Flowmaster?

Old Feb 13, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #16  
Nihilism's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Nietzsche's Closet
Two questions to the owners of a Magnaflow:

1)Does installing it void any type of warranty?
2)Have you had any problems so far with your Magnaflow?

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #17  
Grimalkin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: PDX vicinity
1) NO!

2) NO!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 12:53 AM
  #18  
SVTErick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
i gave the part number to the muffler. people this is ALL you need. keep your stock piping, buy this muffler and a 4" tip and youll notice some good power when you hit it!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #19  
Nihilism's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Nietzsche's Closet
Anyone have any pics of a Magnaflow installed on their truck?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 12:21 PM
  #20  
JMorri's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
I was browsing the Magnaflow website and I noticed a blurb about just replacing your Muffler might not be the most effective if you have pipes that restrict the flow before the Muffler.

It sounds like SVTErick has some pretty strong feeling about just going with the Muffler, can you expand on why you went this route and why you feel the Flowmaster cat-back system isn't worth it??
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 08:16 PM
  #21  
SVTErick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
anything over bigger than your stock piping is a ticket to losing your low end, though you will gain top end. with stock piping and my muffler and tip i get stainless steel tubing a great muffler and tip and keep my low end and top end. a flowmaster muffler is as good as a gutted stock muffler.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #22  
JMorri's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
How'd you decide which one of their hundreds of muffler to go with besides the obvious size requirements?

How does your muffler compare to the 14246 another poster went with?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 05:34 AM
  #23  
SVTErick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
i went with it through a buddy of mine on FTW's suggestion. he tried the muffler before and told me to try it, so i did and to tell you the truth ive gone Gibson, Flowmaster and Dynomax and this Magnaflow muffler has the best sound and performance of them all. remember in terms of performance, i went SI/SO so DI/DO is going to cost you a little low end. it aint really that big of a deal. good luck!
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #24  
TruBluScru's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally posted by JMorri
I was browsing the Magnaflow website and I noticed a blurb about just replacing your Muffler might not be the most effective if you have pipes that restrict the flow before the Muffler.

It sounds like SVTErick has some pretty strong feeling about just going with the Muffler, can you expand on why you went this route and why you feel the Flowmaster cat-back system isn't worth it??
It's tough to have a definative discussion about this without an understanding of the valve timing in this engine. SVTErick is probably right though. High torque engines typically have less valve overlap making them more efficient and powerful at low RPM's. Decreasing back pressure (with a cat back) has the same effect as increasing overlap, which does make the engine more powerful at high RPM's (which negate the effect of increased overlap) at the cost of low end power. Because of this, I wouldn't install a full cat-back system until I could put an intake on as well. Increasing the velocity of the intake charge will compensate for the decreased backpressure by increasing compression and the ratio of intake to exhaust gasses in the cylinder. That said, I'm going to wait until all the intake companies have their designs nailed down. Then upgrade the intake and exhaust at the same time.
 

Last edited by TruBluScru; Feb 17, 2004 at 05:26 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #25  
SVTErick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
good point Scru. the gain is so minimal that its really up to you, what you do. i would definately add some sort of aftermarket air intake though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #26  
Wantofok's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: S.CA
What kind of difference would there be in fuel economy and performance in just replacing the muffler vs. cat-back? And does it justify the price difference?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #27  
SVTErick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
the price is $400 for the catback VS. $200 for the muffler, tip replacement.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.