1997 - 2003 F-150

Popular Mechanics review Circa1999

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 11:08 PM
  #1  
Patman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Popular Mechanics review Circa1999

https://books.google.com/books/about...d=SmYEAAAAMBAJ

(click magazine cover to load the scanned pages)


Page 70 from the article (about halfway down) is an interesting article comparing the Big3 trucks with the all new 1999 tundra


 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 07:57 PM
  #2  
AndersonS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Cool read.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Thanks, who would have guessed the 99 F150 was the fastest! The lousy brakes are a definite known.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2015 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Note the 0-60 times - the Ford 5.4 is slower than today's truck with the base V-6.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2015 | 10:52 AM
  #5  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Originally Posted by glc
Note the 0-60 times - the Ford 5.4 is slower than today's truck with the base V-6.
Yep, it has less horsepower. The extra low end torque (I'm assuming) doesn't make up the difference.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2015 | 01:15 PM
  #6  
ishootstuff's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 928
Likes: 9
That was cool. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2015 | 05:35 PM
  #7  
Patman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Also think it's funny they complained about the ride height. Aka too tall, and now new trucks are like 4" taller
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 8, 2015 | 08:41 PM
  #8  
camopaint0707's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by glc
Note the 0-60 times - the Ford 5.4 is slower than today's truck with the base V-6.
says a lot about automotive engineering
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2015 | 05:16 AM
  #9  
AndersonS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
4 wheel disc brakes could only manage 164' 60-0?!

Might be time for a brake upgrade...
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2015 | 11:03 AM
  #10  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Originally Posted by AndersonS
4 wheel disc brakes could only manage 164' 60-0?!

Might be time for a brake upgrade...
Ford evidently didn't believe in adequate brakes back then. Maybe still don't. I do know my previous 2000 F150Scab4x4 and my present 2002 have lousy brakes. It's a common complaint going back decades with Fords of all flavors.
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2015 | 11:45 AM
  #11  
Patman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Lightning brake upgrade was best bang for the buck on my red 03
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2015 | 02:38 PM
  #12  
AndersonS's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
I was looking for a cheap way to improve braking on a 4WD...
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2015 | 03:02 PM
  #13  
Halverso_99's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 2
From: Niverville MB
Nice find. That was a good read.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2015 | 12:26 AM
  #14  
jethat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,522
Likes: 6
From: Utah
Originally Posted by Roadie
Yep, it has less horsepower. The extra low end torque (I'm assuming) doesn't make up the difference.
I'll have to go out and test drive one. Last time I test drove a new f-150 it was a 3v 5.4 that was rated with much more HP then my 99. It was a total dog in comparison to my truck though. I have a hard time believing the base V6 has come that far in 5 years.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2015 | 10:36 AM
  #15  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
The 08 4.2 had 202 hp and 260 tq. The 14 3.7 had 302 hp and 278 tq. The 15 3.5 NA has 282 hp and 253 tq. For comparison, the 99 5.4 had 260 hp and 350 tq. The 99 and 08 had a 4 speed auto, the 14 and 15 has a 6 speed auto.

0-60 on the 99 is 8.5, the 11 3.7 is 7.6.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.