Not ranting, it was a briefings into the difficulties encountered resulting in a strange need to justify the fact I had more than one windshield wiper before the wreck, and now for instance, I have 1.

I tell them, they respond with how do they know, I had 2 wipers, I ask them well you listen to my loss statements, and with that method of declaration, how do you know I had 4 tires? This is the box I am stuck in, chopped off from common sense, obvious common knowledge is not applying here, it is known as a 'bad faith practice' for 'forcing into litigation'

Thanks for the 2 apparent answers (or assumed answers, since I spent the weekend with my daughter, and off the computer. It may have seemed I took em' and ran, but no. I can debate all day, but I dont want to waste your time in being corrected. Im not lying, I also expect no one to care, so I just briefly explain the basis of 'no-way' actually needs to apply here, so they can see my need for explanation. I also 'seek advice' yea, like I said, seeking advice on the explanation of 'how' from mechanics, or mechanically inclined. So I create an account, and a thread, sorry I belittled you sir.

And no, you need not do anything. Also my former insurer declares that since liability has been declared by the opposing party, call them, then lock up starts, similar to the one I am fighting. Blah. And finding another insurance company, sure, I will/am but that will happen after I give the new insurance company something to insure. No one here is bothering me, or honestly getting to me, its just went off course is all, and when you get auto responded by 'quack' detectors, everybody sees the need to continue an extension of whatever poorly attempted punch line was entered previously, and in the mean time, my daughter wants to go slide. We have no running vehicle.

 

I just want to thank you. For my first possible explanation to through out there, and to research as possible myself. Thanks for that. I have signed nothing, im trying, but the lawyer thing.. well see the rest of the thread for that lol. Off subject it is though because this was what I need, possibilities to research and ways to check out myself. Thanks!

***ALSO is that, I cant even remember if I stated on here, or check it from my phone I am currently on, but is that for my exact model year make and engine? or universally applicable in some way? thanks again so much!

 

Re-read my other responses for the explanation in some of your response but, as it pertains to this 'contradiction'

"... but without a doctor seeing me for my medical claim they will not take or help me on the case..."

you stated:

And then later on in post he say's that No lawyer will help him, because he is indigent.

"..No lawyer will help me, because I am indigent.."

I am without funds, that doesnt mean I should be 'raped' and violated, of my life's material possessions. Just because I am broke. Or disabled from access to the court system (constitutional violation by the way). Which is why each attorney swears an oath, and they swear their oath in their jurisdictional circuit. etc..

and in Unemployment, yes you can. These vary by state. Obviously everybody would be getting fired instead of laid off to save the finances of all companies then, if that were the case. They are supposed to individually investigate each claim, which must be declared separation 'at no fault' of your own, in my case, got seriously sick. And for my total employment since November 2007, I had perfect attendance. Went to a medical clinic, given an excuse, then an hour later was admitted into an Emergency Room for 16 hours. Next day I report to work before my next scheduled shift, and was terminated 2 weeks later, after waiting in that 2 weeks period, in limbo. Not one time, have I recieved my just benefit. And when discharged, I have over proven, but it is the former employers burden to show proof and just cause as to why it was at fault of my own I was separated. Meaning they submit, say a pattern of behavior, or write ups, tardiness, etc.. to show why I should not be eligible to recieve UI, they contest this, because they pay for this, out of an account set aside for payment of this benefit. So they technically must prove that they dont have to pay me. And they failed miserably, yet you dont get to deal with a normal judicial person until my stage. 8 months later. So yea it sucks, damn, it sucks. lol

 

Your right, they dont. So lets assume for a minute that this occurs to you. Pretty much, your obviously a liar. Because it 'never' happens.

Pff.. we know better

The obvious 'huh' and 'no way' factor is the parts where trial comes into play. Thats why its unusual, because somebody needs to remedy it. ASAP. I am indigent in regards to expenditures on unnecessary or in that case necessary, expenses of thousands of dollars.

I do not know where I am going on this either! Exactly my point in acknowledging the experienced pool of respectable experienced mechanically inclined here. I need possible routes to pursue. I will research on my own if pointed to it. I must explain what I am saying to whomever needs to fix it. Right now this is the insurance company. Who along with the autobody place, ignored my statements of loss and has never even cranked my truck after having it for 2 months, almost $5,000 spent and so on, on the ol' front end damage/rear end collision doctrine. I have already proven them wrong twice on the body. But the engine, is why I came to the givers here on this thread. 'Going to HAVE TO' sounds simple enough, put yourself there and now what? Just refer to you and your child alone, seriously. What are your choices? But your belief although respectable, I am not after, we will never hang out and be 'bros' there was more to the story then I told, so read my new responses. I am not here to be a story teller or to entertain, i can if you all like, later on afterwards, keeping anyone and all posted, i mean all my proof is already online anyways but, my daughter needs to go to the park. Seriously guys, im not offended in any of these, just I am not kidding, it is truth, I see no problem, just one guy who answered BRIEFLY without questioning me etc. I could silence any and all doubters with posted crowd silencing exactly 'what i have said' proof but how bout help first??... dang.