Lightning

Front end alignment specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-05-2000, 04:39 PM
WA 2 FST's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Allen, TX, USA
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Front end alignment specs

Off to get my front end aligned tomorrow since I installed the lowering springs this last weekend. I have driven the thing only 3-4 miles, but I know I need to get it aligned ASAP as its sitting with a lot of negative camber right now from the looks of it.

Anyway, I'm not that familiar with alignment specs for a truck suspension. The place where I'm getting it done has the factory specs, and a laser alignment rack, so that's good. However, I was wondering if there's one side of the spec "range" I should be on for best tire wear.

Any of you who've had an alignment done and have your spec sheets could you please respond?

Thanks,

------------------
Wes Tarbox
90 LX 5.0 (10.69 @ 134.7)--597rwhp/590rwtq
96 Cobra (12.63 @ 114.5)--392rwhp/433rwtq
99 Lightning (13.20 @ 103.3)--364rwhp/444rwtq
00 Expedition XLT 5.4
http://members.aol.com/Wa2fst/index.html

 
  #2  
Old 09-05-2000, 04:45 PM
thepawn's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clifton, NJ, USA
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ford Alignement spec:

L.H. Caster: 6.9, +/- 1.0 Deg.
R.H. Caster: 7.4, +/- 1.0 Deg.
L.H. Camber: -0.5, +/- 0.7 Deg.
R.H. Camber: -0.5, +/- 0.7 Deg.
L.H. Toe: -0.05, +/- 0.15
R.H. Toe: -0.05, +/- 0.15

Base F150: (tolerances same as above)

L.H. Caster: 6.2
R.H. Caster: 6.7
L.H. Camber: -0.3
R.H. Camber: -0.3
L.H. Toe: 0.03
R.H. Toe: 0.03

Lightning Owner prefered:

LH Caster 6.7
RH Caster 7.2
LH Camber -0.5
RH Camber -0.5
LH Toe -0.05 (slight toe in)
RH Toe -0.05 (same)

Lightning Owner autocross prefered specs:

LH Camber -0.7
RH Camber -0.7
LH Toe OUT 0.05
RH Toe OUT 0.05
 
  #3  
Old 09-05-2000, 05:00 PM
DreaminAboutL's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Wes: Negative camber is a GOOD thing!

And will you need new bolts in front (eccentric bolts) to get a proper alignment??

-Dreamin
'00 L
 
  #4  
Old 09-05-2000, 05:25 PM
redlite's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you are going to the Ford Dealer for the alignment, it would be interesting to see if they will tell you that you need a four wheel alignment because of the rear wheel thrust angle adjustment. SILVERBULLET says this is a waste of money. I think my Dealer was charging $70-$80 bucks for this alignment. There is more on this in the topic, "SVT READ THIS".
 
  #5  
Old 09-05-2000, 11:50 PM
WA 2 FST's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Allen, TX, USA
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

The pawn,

Thanks man for the detailed info!

Dreamin',

I agree neg. camber is good...but not so much that its overly noticeable. My tires wear fast enough as it is. But, yes I understand that in a strictly road-race environment, you'd want more than on a typical street driven vehicle.

Just eye-balling it, I'd say I'm close to -2.0^ camber right now...maybe a little more.

------------------
Wes Tarbox
90 LX 5.0 (10.69 @ 134.7)--597rwhp/590rwtq
96 Cobra (12.63 @ 114.5)--392rwhp/433rwtq
99 Lightning (13.20 @ 103.3)--364rwhp/444rwtq
00 Expedition XLT 5.4 http://members.aol.com/Wa2fst/index.html



[This message has been edited by WA 2 FST (edited 09-05-2000).]
 



Quick Reply: Front end alignment specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.