How Much Boost????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Vortech Boost, Pulleys, and Intercoolers????

How much boost should I shoot for out of my Vortech. I am trying to finish off the upgrades to my current set up. I installed a Vortech and got a little greedy along the way, now I gota have more. I'm installing an intercooler now but also will be changing pulleys to get more boost once I'm done with the intercooler. Just how much is the question???

Here's the scenario....
Stock Vortech no intercooler stock 3.33 pulley got me 7lbs of boost. I threw on a 2.95 pulley just for a run or two so I could get a feel for how much it increased my boost. It went up to 9lbs, again with no intercooler. Two pulley sizes got me 2lbs so 1lb increase for each pulley size decrease. I do have long tubes and custom 3" single exhaust so I think the little lower boost numbers are due to the free flow. Actual boost would probably be higher.

Once I add the intercooler, how small of a pulley do I go with.
Here are my pulley calculations:
3.33"-2.95"=0.38" got me 2lbs so .38/2lbs=.19 inch decrease yeilds 1lb.
I'm at 7lbs stock with no intercooler. I would like to be around 12 before installing the cooler to maybe get me to around 10 after the intercooler.

I can go with a Reichard 2.5 pulley. 3.33"-2.5"=0.83"decrease
.83"/.19" to get 1lb =4.4lb increase. 4.4 added to my stock 7 = 11.4 before adding an intercooler, which should be about 9-10 after the intercooler.

My question, is that too much? I think my boost numbers are low because it's flowing more. Am I asking for too much? I know my boost numbers would be higher on a stock truck. It will be tuned properly, so tune is not an issue. It doesn't get abused that often, so it wouldn't be constantly pounded on. Only the occassional WOT run. With the intercooler and safe tune, should I go for a 2.75" pulley or the Reichard 2.5"? The rest of my mods are listed below
 

Last edited by derrick929; Sep 16, 2008 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #2  
LowFast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Stay at or under 12lbs intercooled with a dead on tune and you should be fine.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #3  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LowFast
Stay at or under 12lbs intercooled with a dead on tune and you should be fine.
Lowfast,
What I'm trying to figure out is whats 12lbs? My numbers seem low compared to more stock numbers? Do I take that into account? Or is my 12lbs more like a true 14 if I had more "backpressure" so to speak.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
stoffer's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,679
Likes: 84
From: missing Texas...
with better flow ie long tubes and decent exhaust, cams, ported and polished heads etc will make more power on less "boost" since boost is only restriction and power is made by actual airflow thru the engine.


you're making decent boost for your mods and I believe you are pushing your luck without an innercooler.

I would seriously consider the 2.5" pulley and I would dyno it with the innercooler and current pulley and then check the power numbers to see how close you are to the threshold of a factory non-svt block
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #5  
ONELOWF's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: NEVADA
As tarajerame says, there are limits to how much detonation the non svt engine will take, then popped head gaskets, or pistons. Get the whole package together with moderate boost, and then add more.
A little read.....
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...d%20Calculator
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...pressor%20Maps
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 02:13 AM
  #6  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Yeah, I am afraid I might be crossing that fine line..... I want to be right at it without pushing it too far. Just gets expensive at $150 per pulley(reichard racing) and $185 per tune. Trying to limit my guesses as much as I can.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 04:43 AM
  #7  
stoffer's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,679
Likes: 84
From: missing Texas...
innercooler, dyno and then see where you are at before you add anymore unless you want to risk the engine; but then again if you blow it up you always build it bigger and better


my truck now makes around11psi and I have a better crank pulley just waiting but i know better than to stick it on, I'd rather pull a tired engine than a ruined engine.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 17, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #8  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=tarajerame;3377367]but then again if you blow it up you always build it bigger and better QUOTE]

Good reason.... I will probably go for it, worst case is about $2,500 and a brand new short block...then I can put as much boost to it as I want and not worry.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #9  
ONELOWF's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: NEVADA
You guys are getting pretty negative here!

Let's just work on the intake temps and timing and play safe. NO detonation, please!
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #10  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ONELOWF
You guys are getting pretty negative here!

Let's just work on the intake temps and timing and play safe. NO detonation, please!
I'm pretty sure I'll have to pull some timing out.... it was knocking a little with the 2.95" Only made a run or two just to check.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #11  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
I went ahead and got the 2.50" pulley....we'll see how long it lasts.....
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #12  
ONELOWF's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: NEVADA
Originally Posted by derrick929
I'm pretty sure I'll have to pull some timing out.... it was knocking a little with the 2.95" Only made a run or two just to check.
It will only get worse with the intercooler. I'm not positive, but I think that the pcm starts pulling timing at 150* iat. So, considering the ambient temps for your neighborhood in a couple of weeks? when you have the cooler working, there will be no timing pulled at all. My thinking is that your iats will be 125* or less.
My last datalogs with the same cooler at 10-11 psi, 105* ambient showed 134* iats.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #13  
LowFast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Another way to look at it, how much power are you currently putting to the wheels? In supercharged form (on stock non-L internals) around 400rwhp seems to be the upper safe limit, after that point you are walking a very fine line IMHO. The more power you can get on less boost all the better. You are dyno tuning this with a wideband, correct?
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #14  
derrick929's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LowFast
Another way to look at it, how much power are you currently putting to the wheels? In supercharged form (on stock non-L internals) around 400rwhp seems to be the upper safe limit, after that point you are walking a very fine line IMHO. The more power you can get on less boost all the better. You are dyno tuning this with a wideband, correct?
Yep, it will be tuned with a wideband. No dyno though....Current tune is done by JJ at Woodbine Motorsports.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #15  
Buck50's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Canoga Park,Ca
so these trucks can take about 12 pounds on a stock internals reliably?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.