Bedliners, Caps, Tops & Lids
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ford Engineer ....5-10% Fuel Savings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
KP SCAB's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Question Ford Engineer ....5-10% Fuel Savings

Ford Engineer Says Tonneau Covers Provide 5-10% Fuel Savings

http://truck-bed-covers.com/Tonneau_..._save_fuel.htm

Sales Pitch or fact? what are your thoughts???

 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #2  
red_candle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
i think i'd agree

it makes sense. mine will have a cover when I get it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Old news and maybe under ideal driving conditions, but real world I'd go with 1-3%... basically, barely noticable!
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #4  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
Can't say I have ever noticed a change in gas milage with any kind of tonneau I have owned. Soft or hard.
I have an Undercover, but that's more for looks and security.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #5  
Buck Henry's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally posted by dzervit
Old news and maybe under ideal driving conditions, but real world I'd go with 1-3%... basically, barely noticable!
I agree, percent impact improvement is probably 1 to 3% at best. It may not seem like much now, but a 3% gain in MPG could start to add up pretty quick if gas hits $4.00 - $5.00 bucks per gallon as some doomsdayers are predicting.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #6  
KCSport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Platte City, Missouri
Originally posted by kingfish51
Can't say I have ever noticed a change in gas milage with any kind of tonneau I have owned. Soft or hard.
I have an Undercover, but that's more for looks and security.

Yeah what He said.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
Crash_edwards's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, TX
I agree as well. 1 to 3% max.....

Works well for keeping stuff dry though...

Its also a great place to put the kids when they get out of control. Make sure it is a good quality lock....
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #8  
Justis01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
I noticed the best results are obtained with highway driving. About a 1.5 mpg increase.

Scott
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #9  
hades281's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
I am a mechanical engineering undergrad at Texas Tech; about ten years ago the university did wind-tunnel testing on F-150 (scaled model) truck configurations to determine which were the best for gas mileage (greatest reduction in drag).

I think the best configuration had a tonneau cover, a small wing attached to the cab, and a small wing on the tailgate IIRC. One of the worst was with the tailgate DOWN because as the air blows over the top of the cab and drops off the tailgate, it creates more drag and "down force."

I'll try to find the report and post it, it's pretty interesting!
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #10  
texaspyro21's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock or Houston
I always love seeing other Raiders around here.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally posted by hades281

I think the best configuration had a tonneau cover, a small wing attached to the cab, and a small wing on the tailgate

No.

No wings.

I don't care what it does for mileage... it's just plain wrong.


And let's face it... if you are that worried about the cost of gassing these things up... buy a Ranger.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #12  
drug delivery's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
If I got 1% increase in fule mileage, that would allow me to drive 150 miles further a year based on what I currently drive. Nothing to be excited about. 3-5% might be worth it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #13  
hades281's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
Texaspyro, are you still in the L B K? The 806?!

hehe
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
masseyman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 616
Likes: 1
From: midwest
Many years ago there was a magazine called "Pickup Van and 4 wheel drive" or PV4 for short. They conducted a test with the tailgate up and with the tailgate removed, the latter showed a 6% improvement. I always tended to believe the results. I can see where the tailgate would create a great air dam.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #15  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally posted by masseyman
Many years ago there was a magazine called "Pickup Van and 4 wheel drive" or PV4 for short. They conducted a test with the tailgate up and with the tailgate removed, the latter showed a 6% improvement. I always tended to believe the results. I can see where the tailgate would create a great air dam.
this has been studied professionally in wind tunnels.

tailgate down or removed is worse than tailgate up. With gate up, an air bubble is created. Wind flows over the windbubble.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.