302 87' & 93' gapping 1 quest./ 4 forums / 0 answers
Maybe it's a misprint,but motorcraft online parts cat. where you enter Mk./Yr./Mod./Eng. and it coughs up the specific part #'s, gives the same part#'s for Distrib., Cap, Coil. & Plugs for both 87' & 93' (N) 302's. BUT Here lies the rub! The Gap to use on the same plug screwed into the 87 is .044. but screw it into a 93 and the gap should now be .054 stock! and if I want to run that gap on my 87 I'm told I'll need to bolt on sumore Volts? I've posted this ? on 4 forums where their continuing to gather dust even now. answers have ranged from nada to one or more vowel sounds, but not in a row. If its incorrect motorcraft info and whatever year the gap increase occurred was the year they ran out of the cute little coils but had alot of the bigger ugly ones laying around. I'd still like to know?
|
just follow what the sticker under the hood says. the 87 should be .044 and the 93 .054. i think it was changed for emmission purposes. and all the parts are the same.
|
Thanks for replying. that's a reasonable premise but then how does the 93' run good & cleaner w/ .054 gap stock but the 87' w/ that gap misses and runs over rich? While Knowing why the gap mod was done is good, I'm reeeeeally interested in how they achieve this when ignition components are identical down to the plugs and so far, it seems like everything else, except speedo system. Maybe I'm wording it wrong!......."How does the 93' 302 having the identical ignition components as the 87' 302, run with .054 plug gap stock. But the 87' 302 requires a High output coil mod to allow the same .054 gap to be used???????? Maybe I should switch to searching for some answer I might have better luck with. That Holy Grail thing's still M.I.A. isn't it? Anyway, looking around for the answer to the gaping question I learned about Side Gaping. Doing that to a set of Motorcraft coppers & a 2 degree timing bump got me a bit stronger acceleration and when I kept my foot out of it, 2 mpg's. But if anyone happens to know whats up with the gaping question, I'd really appreciate knowing!
|
my manual says that it was widened to allow the engine to run significantly longer on a set of spark plugs. but efficiency and power and fuel economy will drop a little bit.
|
Originally Posted by Matts ford
(Post 3466478)
my manual says that it was widened to allow the engine to run significantly longer on a set of spark plugs. but efficiency and power and fuel economy will drop a little bit.
|
Originally Posted by jethat
(Post 3466495)
That seems odd to me considering the gap grows over time. I would think smaller gap would leed to longer plug life. I gap the plugs in my Mach I at .45. It has a modernized ignition system MSD 6AL MSD pro billet distributor Mallory pro blaster coil. I asked around and the general conciseness was .45 but I think I could run way bigger and it would still work all that voltage going though there. I've removed plugs out of old EFI 351w's the gap had grown ro nearly .90 Modern ignition systems arent very gap sensitive like the old low voltage points ignitions.
|
Originally Posted by Matts ford
(Post 3466478)
my manual says that it was widened to allow the engine to run significantly longer on a set of spark plugs. but efficiency and power and fuel economy will drop a little bit.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands