Ecoboost mileage doesn't add up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 12:51 PM
  #46  
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: north Texas
Originally Posted by papa tiger
The 15/16 2.7L sequential turbo Nano motor is to get 28 mpg in the F150. Ford reaches for it to put the Ford fleet near the 35 MPG across the fleet target the EPA has set.
But it also uses start/stop technology and active shutters in the grill (not sure if all the new engines do or just it).

As far as EPA tests for the eco, yes it will get into boost unless you drive with an egg under your foot and on flat land. More boost= more power= more fuel burned.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 01:08 PM
  #47  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
The 3.5 has a different tune, even without the turbos spinning.

More HP = more fuel used. Period.

Even 2 of the same engine can get different efficiency scores. Case in point, the 2.0 in the Escort and early Focus vs the Mazda 3 cousin using the same engine (Mazda having a more aggressive tune)
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM.