View Poll Results: Do you think that yu should post your sig in EVERY post or even in every thread ?
I think that I should be able to do what I want NO matter what it looks like - My ego requires it
37.50%
I think that sensible intelligent people post their sig a maximum of once per thread if that many
43.18%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: Is it required to post your sig in EVERY post ?
#46
One of the main reasons I come here is to not only read about what guys (and girls) have done to their trucks but to see the photos. The signature is a great way for people who don't have all day to browse the forum to get ideas about how to mod their trucks.
As long as nobody puts a photo of a naked guy in a signature, I don't have any complaints.
By the way, isn't having dial-up in the year 2007 tantamount to having a mullet any time after 1989 or so?
As long as nobody puts a photo of a naked guy in a signature, I don't have any complaints.
By the way, isn't having dial-up in the year 2007 tantamount to having a mullet any time after 1989 or so?
#47
Originally Posted by Raoul
"Drop that gunbelt and reach for the sky!
Ima takin' you in.
You're wanted in General Discussion, SuperCrew and the Other Body terrritory for excessive pixels.
You can go peaceable or not.
In the saddle or across it, don't make no nevermind to me."
How does that sound?
I'm willing to work on it, I really want a badge.
Ima takin' you in.
You're wanted in General Discussion, SuperCrew and the Other Body terrritory for excessive pixels.
You can go peaceable or not.
In the saddle or across it, don't make no nevermind to me."
How does that sound?
I'm willing to work on it, I really want a badge.
#48
Originally Posted by DCinMI
One of the main reasons I come here is to not only read about what guys (and girls) have done to their trucks but to see the photos. The signature is a great way for people who don't have all day to browse the forum to get ideas about how to mod their trucks.
As long as nobody puts a photo of a naked guy in a signature, I don't have any complaints.
By the way, isn't having dial-up in the year 2007 tantamount to having a mullet any time after 1989 or so?
As long as nobody puts a photo of a naked guy in a signature, I don't have any complaints.
By the way, isn't having dial-up in the year 2007 tantamount to having a mullet any time after 1989 or so?
__________________
Jim
Jim
#50
#52
Hmm...
Don't really like RULE #5 .. seems pretty limiting...
Still think a better starting point would be GUIDELINES first... see how users react, see if they will volentarily change...
One other question... can you, WEBMASTER, change user preferences so that a user can switch on and off signatures? (he/she wouldn't load that onfo from datatbase) That may be the best of both worlds. Those with dial-up/slow connections/no mouse scroll can turn 'off' sigs, and those with high speed who like lookin at all the proud image sigs can turn sigs 'on'.
Still think a better starting point would be GUIDELINES first... see how users react, see if they will volentarily change...
One other question... can you, WEBMASTER, change user preferences so that a user can switch on and off signatures? (he/she wouldn't load that onfo from datatbase) That may be the best of both worlds. Those with dial-up/slow connections/no mouse scroll can turn 'off' sigs, and those with high speed who like lookin at all the proud image sigs can turn sigs 'on'.
#53
#54
Originally Posted by undeaddemon
Don't really like RULE #5 .. seems pretty limiting...
Still think a better starting point would be GUIDELINES first... see how users react, see if they will volentarily change...
One other question... can you, WEBMASTER, change user preferences so that a user can switch on and off signatures? (he/she wouldn't load that onfo from datatbase) That may be the best of both worlds. Those with dial-up/slow connections/no mouse scroll can turn 'off' sigs, and those with high speed who like lookin at all the proud image sigs can turn sigs 'on'.
Still think a better starting point would be GUIDELINES first... see how users react, see if they will volentarily change...
One other question... can you, WEBMASTER, change user preferences so that a user can switch on and off signatures? (he/she wouldn't load that onfo from datatbase) That may be the best of both worlds. Those with dial-up/slow connections/no mouse scroll can turn 'off' sigs, and those with high speed who like lookin at all the proud image sigs can turn sigs 'on'.
You can turn off signatures in the User CP. I have cable internet but turned the signatures off.
#56
#58
#59
Originally Posted by undeaddemon
'paulv107' is spot on. YOU CAN TURN SIG's OFF!... why is this even an issue?
As you can see, I haven't gone crazy with any huge SIG. I like lookin at SIG's.... IF I didn't like 'em, I could just turn 'em off....
The issue already has been solved.
As you can see, I haven't gone crazy with any huge SIG. I like lookin at SIG's.... IF I didn't like 'em, I could just turn 'em off....
The issue already has been solved.
#60
dunno...
I wouldnt be happy with 1 or 3 lines of text.... I wish we could add more vb or html code to the sig... for me... i like small text... but had no success setting
though it gladly took
dunno.... perhaps if there were more tools for creating sigs... users could get all the info in a set area...
I think if you don't wanna see large sigs... up ur resolution....
I wouldnt be happy with 1 or 3 lines of text.... I wish we could add more vb or html code to the sig... for me... i like small text... but had no success setting
though it gladly took
dunno.... perhaps if there were more tools for creating sigs... users could get all the info in a set area...
I think if you don't wanna see large sigs... up ur resolution....