View Poll Results: Do you think that yu should post your sig in EVERY post or even in every thread ?
I think that I should be able to do what I want NO matter what it looks like - My ego requires it
37.50%
I think that sensible intelligent people post their sig a maximum of once per thread if that many
43.18%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: Is it required to post your sig in EVERY post ?
#17
03-18-2007, 10:20 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
03-18-2007, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Motor City
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
03-18-2007, 10:53 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Susquehanna Valley, pa.
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
03-18-2007, 10:56 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
03-19-2007, 12:32 AM
#23
03-19-2007, 02:15 AM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may be new here but I am on half a dozen other forums and the sigs here are WAY too big. Let them post it every time post but trim it down to about 200 pixels thick. Then you can have a link to your gallery where if people want to see some nice detailed pics of your truck or whatever they can but otherwise you can scroll down and half the posts are just pictures of giant signatures.
#24
03-19-2007, 02:19 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere near the back of beyond
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
03-19-2007, 09:45 AM
Cool. 
IMO, the size of my sigs are borderline too big. The size of the sigs is what we need to figure out and get a standard on.
Kobi said it best:
I dont give a crap about "how many times" it shows up in a thread, that just shows me that *so and so* is on top of that thread. I skim read alot of these threads, and the sigs help me go faster if I'm searching for something, or someone.
Oh BTW....good Monday morning.
IMO, the size of my sigs are borderline too big. The size of the sigs is what we need to figure out and get a standard on.
Kobi said it best:
Originally Posted by Kobi
. . . what is up with the giant sigs??? Long ago we sort of came to an informal agreement where sigs were 100 x 500 . . . MAX . . . some of you are seriously starved for attention. And that new kid who got seriously involved in wanting to make giant sigs. Stop it. Stop it now. Sigs are supposed to be minimalist. The art is conveying all the info you can in such a small space. Anyone can make a giant sig. That's easy. When you can convey the essence of the person and what they want to say in 100x500, then you've done something. (Granted, in the scope of worldly important things it's useless, but in this universe it has meaning). Also, with regard to Photoshop . . . NONE of you should be leaving your day jobs. You wanna see a great sig, check out Brewdude's. (And D . . . love your new sig.)
I dont give a crap about "how many times" it shows up in a thread, that just shows me that *so and so* is on top of that thread. I skim read alot of these threads, and the sigs help me go faster if I'm searching for something, or someone.
Oh BTW....good Monday morning.
#26
03-19-2007, 10:45 AM
Originally Posted by Stealth
...overuse of the quote feature is deserving of a week long ban as well...
As far as quotes, it's worth the effort to just cut out the actual part of the post you're responding too.
Nobody wants to re-read a long post just to try an figure out what part you're yaking about.
Some dots before and after (as above) indicate the quote has been 'cut out'.
Save a tree!
#27
03-19-2007, 10:58 AM
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 6,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#28
03-19-2007, 11:12 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also think that it helps identify the poster.
