Pre-1997 Models

cam problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
dave186's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Wilder, ID
cam problem

Well i got my motor out today and discovered something. It turns out that i have a 1993 motor and it has roller lifters. well i already bought a non roller cam and lifters. so what should i do, use the cam and lifters i bought or get a roller cam to go with the factory roller lifters?
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 03:17 AM
  #2  
TF's Avatar
TF
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: California
I would buy a new roller cam and of course new roller lifters to match (I'm sure you're aware that you cannot re-use lifters with a new cam). Why not take advantage of the benefits that a roller cam setup provides, especially since that's your baseline setup? No use going backwards in performance and efficiency. Just my .02. Out of curiosity, do you have mass air or speed density? If you have the latter, I don't know if your computer is going to tolerate anything too wild and crazy. If you have the former, you have the liberty to go with a considerably more agressive cam, but of course it all depends on how you want your truck to run. Good luck!
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 10:07 AM
  #3  
dave186's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Wilder, ID
Thats what im thinking, i dont want to use 1950s technology. But you can re-use roller lifters, they dont get into a pattern like flat tappets do. and I do have speed density, thats what im concerned about, whether or not this crane cam is going to be too much. it looks like my only option though if i want to stick with the rollers, other than a custom cam.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 11:37 PM
  #4  
blksn955.o's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis/ St. Charles
look at a stock mustang GT cam. the numbers are better than the crane (if its the one I am thinking of used by some "L" owners) and it will work with SD since the cam was/ had been used mostly unchanged from the days of mustang SD. A bud used my stock cam in his 94 "L" and it picked up quit a bit, not to mention I gave him it for free, I then bought the Bronco and bought a 92 GT cam for $20, not a bad price as that is the going rate. You can reuse the rollor lifters as since they do not wear to the cam.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 10:23 AM
  #5  
ccnseven's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Down South
I would definitely stick with the roller cam and lifters, my truck also has s/d and I run a mild crane cam with no chip and no problems.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #6  
TF's Avatar
TF
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: California
You're right, what was I thinking? (About using the old roller lifters) :o
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
dave186's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Wilder, ID
well, i got the powermax 2020. the motor is mostly back together and ready to be slapped in. im feeling pretty sick so i think i might have to stay home from work tommorow
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 11:46 PM
  #8  
dave186's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Wilder, ID
found this on cranes website:

"Many magazine articles, and a few books, have stated that “Speed Density” type EFI systems on 5.0L Fords must be converted “Mass Airflow Systems” to work well with aftermarket performance cams. This conversion is expensive, but has been necessary because of the idle and off-idle vacuum characteristics of many performance cam profiles. Crane Cams currently offers two excellent camshafts for street performance that work very well with stock “Speed Density” systems in cars and trucks. Part #444212 is a hydraulic roller camshaft spring and retainer kit that reuses the stock hydraulic roller lifters and the 5.0L HO/351W firing order. Part #364211 is a hydraulic roller camshaft using the 302 firing order. It also reuses the stock hydraulic roller lifters. Spring and retainer kit 44308-1 is available to replace the stock springs and retainers. While compatible with the stock computers, both of these cam kits respond well with computer upgrades. They also are compatible with stock torque converters on the AOD transmissions. SB Ford performance tip: reducing the size of the air injection boss in the exhaust port of Small Block Fords makes a very significant performance improvement with all camshaft upgrades!"
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
ccnseven's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Down South
Anybody know more about this?
SB Ford performance tip: reducing the size of the air injection boss in the exhaust port of Small Block Fords makes a very significant performance improvement with all camshaft upgrades!"
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 12:43 PM
  #10  
StrangeRanger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: Copley, Ohio
Part of any porting job.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 10:12 PM
  #11  
dave186's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Wilder, ID
Yup, i did it when i ported my heads. if you look in the exhaust port you will see what they are talking about, its a small nub on the top of the port.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2003 | 10:39 AM
  #12  
ccnseven's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Down South
I had my heads mildly ported when I built my engine, didn't know about the "air boss" at the time. I assume they removed it. Got me wantin to pull a header and look in there and see for myself
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.