Time For A Change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 10:29 PM
  #1  
Peladu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Time For A Change

*Originally posted in Expedition threed, but thats a ghost town*
Does anyone know the logic behind the way Ford has designed their instrument gages? For the last fifteen years I have been waiting for Ford to get rid of the ‘Idiot’ gages they have been using. Anything within a gross margin is within the “Normal” range. It doesn’t matter that your battery needle is indicating strong to the left, hey, that’s ‘Normal’. Come on already, I want to see numbers instead of “Normal”. These idiot gages have been around too long.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #2  
mountaineer02v8's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: cleveland ohio
acually, who needs a battery gage anyway? No one hardy looks at them. I say just take it off compleatly, mine never moves off the normal mark, so I'm not even sure if it works right or not.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 01:41 AM
  #3  
bigdaddyII's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Louisiana
Ford figures it cheaper and easier to use these cause no one pays any attention to them anyway. The only guage on an automobile that the vast majority of the general public pay attention to nowadays is the fuel guage and some of them dont even look at that. Real guages fluctuate with driving and people were bringing their cars to the service departments thinking something was wrong with their cars cause the guages keep moving.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
CDB03STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Bryant, AL
Here's another question...Why do they put tachometers in Automatics and not in Manual trucks/cars? I had a ranger once, No Tach, Manual Tran., and I know that the equvilant truck but with Automatic had a tach. I haven't paid much attention to the F150's but I have other makes and models. I had to know at what speed my rev limiter kicked in when to shift. Course that was when I was tearing up the streets.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:18 AM
  #5  
shookman34's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Also, if you watch it...the oil pressure needle never moves regardless of the engine RPMs. Once you turn the truck on it goes to one position and stays there. What happens if you lose oil pressure??? Does the needle just go from normal to zero all of a sudden?? If that's the case, they should just get rid of the guage and put a warning light on the dash instead IMO.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
RockyJSquirrel's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 2
The inclusion of a tachometer depends on the trim level of the vehicle, not the type of transmission. Base models have no tach, upgraded trucks have a tach.

Ford gauges have always sucked, but they look good.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #7  
NIUPonyBoy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: DeKalb, IL
Originally Posted by bigdaddyII
Ford figures it cheaper and easier to use these cause no one pays any attention to them anyway. The only guage on an automobile that the vast majority of the general public pay attention to nowadays is the fuel guage and some of them dont even look at that. Real guages fluctuate with driving and people were bringing their cars to the service departments thinking something was wrong with their cars cause the guages keep moving.
ding ding ding

He's got it right there.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 18, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
Bartak1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 4
From: Nebraska
Yeah they suck/pi$$ me off. I think I remember reading the oil press. gauge will read normal unless it goes under 5 pounds. By the time these gauges move out of the normal area, the damage has most likely already been done.

Thats why Ill be installing some REAL gauges soon hopefully.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #9  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
As was mentioned the “real” reason Ford did not install “real time” gauges is because most of the public has no idea what a gauge should read. For example, at first start up and idle the oil pressure will read a much higher pressure then when after the motor has been warmed up and running a while.

Also the oil pressure will fluctuate as the RPM’S go up or down. Temperature gauges are the same but fluctuate much slower. No gauge, not even the fuel gauge, will give you an actual real time reading. The fuel gauge is the closest to an “almost” real time gauge but it will show an average reading. If the fuel gauge was a “real time” gauge then if you only added a few gallons it would register as soon as you started you vehicle. If you read the manual, and I have seen it myself, if you add less then 5 gallons I believe, the fuel gauge will not register right away and could take 15 minutes or longer to read full.

This past spring I installed this triple pillar pod gauge in my Lightning:



The top gauge is an oil pressure gauge which is installed into the block where the stock oil pressure sensor is located. You need to maintain the stock pressure sensor for the vehicles computer because it needs the signal.

The middle gauge is for temperatures. There is a switch so you can read one of the following (water, oil, transmission) temperature.

And the last gauge is an A/F (air/fuel) gauge, which was modified by Gagetseller, so as to get a decent reading at WOT, that is plugged into the front oxygen sensor with a pigtail. You must also maintain the stock plug for the oxygen sensor because the vehicle computer needs that signal as well.

The bottom switch is to turn the gauge lights on or off. I didn’t know if the lights would ever bother me on long drives at night so I wanted the option to turn the lights off.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #10  
Peladu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by CDB03STX
Here's another question...Why do they put tachometers in Automatics and not in Manual trucks/cars? I had a ranger once, No Tach, Manual Tran., and I know that the equvilant truck but with Automatic had a tach. I haven't paid much attention to the F150's but I have other makes and models. I had to know at what speed my rev limiter kicked in when to shift. Course that was when I was tearing up the streets.
My 97 F150 was manual without the Tach, I never understood the reasoning behind it. Yea, it has to do with the trim package but still…I feel that if you have a manual trans there should be a Tach regardless of the trim package.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #11  
CDB03STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Bryant, AL
Originally Posted by RockyJSquirrel
The inclusion of a tachometer depends on the trim level of the vehicle, not the type of transmission. Base models have no tach, upgraded trucks have a tach.

Ford gauges have always sucked, but they look good.
My Ranger was an XLT just as the Automatic was. I didn't want an automatic at the time. The auto had the tach, my manual didn't.

Although it probably still is a trim package deal.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #12  
mikeyss's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 1
From: Longmont, CO
Here's what I don't get....the 95-96 F150 had the digital odomoter, but the 97-98 didn't. And the 97-98 guages sucked soooooo much. I love the 99+ guages. You guys are right though, they NEVER move unless they are going from cold to the "normal" setting.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.