Iran has politely asked to be put on top of the list…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-22-2004, 06:15 PM
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Iran has politely asked to be put on top of the list…

Damn, talk about absolutely no brains whatsoever they only thing one can conclude from Iran’s actions is they want to have their butt whooped on next.

Well I guess they couldn’t have asked at a better time. Let’s see 8 days until we are done in Iraq, so we just move a good chuck of the force on over to Iran. Guess Saudi will have to wait a while…

Story here
 
  #2  
Old 06-22-2004, 08:00 PM
litnfast's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets give them what they want
 

Last edited by litnfast; 06-22-2004 at 08:02 PM.
  #3  
Old 06-22-2004, 08:07 PM
litnfast's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #4  
Old 06-23-2004, 04:55 AM
EnglishAdam's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston and Lil ol' England
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely next
 
  #5  
Old 06-23-2004, 07:31 AM
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So we should go to war with Iran because they captured British ships that were in Iranian waters or because they are developing nuclear capabilities?
 
  #6  
Old 06-23-2004, 07:49 AM
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by momalle1
So we should go to war with Iran because they captured British ships that were in Iranian waters or because they are developing nuclear capabilities?
Both...
 
  #7  
Old 06-23-2004, 08:34 AM
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are they harboring terrorists? Or are we just going to war with all Muslims?
 
  #8  
Old 06-23-2004, 08:39 AM
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 31,440
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I believe that they've released the captured British soliders.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/....uk/index.html
 
  #9  
Old 06-23-2004, 09:31 AM
EnglishAdam's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston and Lil ol' England
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by momalle1
Are they harboring terrorists? Or are we just going to war with all Muslims?
Iran is one of the biggest supporters of terrorism in the world.
They fund Hamas and Hizbollah.
We shouldn't go to war with all Muslims, just the ones who want to kill us.

I say Nuke the Fackers too!
 
  #10  
Old 06-23-2004, 09:52 AM
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by momalle1
Are they harboring terrorists? Or are we just going to war with all Muslims?
Yes...

No...
 
  #11  
Old 06-23-2004, 10:36 AM
BHibbs's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know why Bush lets Iran and even North Korea for that matter push him around. He's told them Both not to develop nukes yet they do and throw it in our face. They've BOTH been very ****y about the whole thing really, and now this....

All I know is neither of these countries were developing nukes under Clinton's watch.
 
  #12  
Old 06-23-2004, 10:52 AM
lariatf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Near Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Yahoo news strory:

One of the soldiers was then shown being interviewed.

"I present my apology to my family, the British government and the Iranian nation for committing this mistake. This will not be repeated, and the lesson we learned was very beneficial," said the soldier, whose comments were dubbed over into Arabic.

If these guys had a right mind about them, they would have known Iran would be foolish to keep them...and so if it were me, I'd have a huge smile on my face and simply tell them "Ok, we accidentally crossed over the border...a simple mistake"...nothing more than that. Screw Iran. They can kiss my veteran a**! I certainly wouldn't give them the kind of begging apology they yanked out of these guys. Those Brits should have been well aware of the fact that there would be hell to pay if Iran tried that crap (actually keeping & prosecuting them). The radical clerics and such over there are rather comical. They honestly do think they're important in the world.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...e_040623140040
 
  #13  
Old 06-23-2004, 11:57 AM
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BHibbs
All I know is neither of these countries were developing nukes under Clinton's watch.
Actually, once again you’re wrong. Clinton ALLOWED both countries to develop nukes under his watch.

Clinton’s policy that allowed that was called: Appeasement

Therefore it takes someone with courage to do the right thing and now people like you complain about it.

So which is it going to be? Should we continue Clinton’s great policy of appeasement that allows countries to develop nukes and allows terrorist to do what ever they wish? Let’s not forget that under Clinton’s watch of appeasement and “getting along” as well as “leveling the playing field” Clinton ALLOWED China to move forward some 20 years in development time with their nuke and missile programs…

He sure was a swell President that cared about the children wasn’t he…
 
  #14  
Old 06-23-2004, 12:37 PM
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport


Clinton’s policy that allowed that was called: Appeasement


same policy used on interns....
 
  #15  
Old 06-23-2004, 01:43 PM
fatman66's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
same policy used on interns....
I believe the policy followed with regard to interns was Appleasement.
 



Quick Reply: Iran has politely asked to be put on top of the list…



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.