F150online Forums

F150online Forums (https://www.f150online.com/forums/)
-   Exhaust & Intake Systems (https://www.f150online.com/forums/exhaust-intake-systems-27/)
-   -   What's best for better mpg? (https://www.f150online.com/forums/exhaust-intake-systems/377862-whats-best-better-mpg.html)

lukenesser May 23, 2009 05:41 PM

What's best for better mpg?
 
I'm new to this forum and have some questions.
I recently purchased an '06 F-150 Supercab withe the 5.4 flex engine.
Thanks to some awesome posts I have installed a Gott's CAI in the truck and have noticed a good gain in performance. (after 1st run about4 mpg increase).
I would like to add a better filter for less restriction ,but wondered if a K&N drop in filter would be worth the money since I don't put alot of miles on my vehicle. Also would I have to tune my chip after getting even more air in or would the computer handle the changes itself.
I love my truck , just wish the mileage were better !

Thanks to all who post and answer here as I am learning so much with every letter from Ford truck lovers. :thumbsup:

Wade06XLT May 23, 2009 06:06 PM

Same reason I joined this site. Bone stock '06 F150 w/the 5.4 myself. Only thing that scares me is spark plug change.

DarrenWS6 May 23, 2009 06:17 PM

A filter will help with flow. I would more suggest letting it exhale much better with a Magnaflow exhaust system.

bigdog87 May 23, 2009 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by DarrenWS6 (Post 3737527)
A filter will help with flow. I would more suggest letting it exhale much better with a Magnaflow exhaust system.

I agree.

Maxout05 May 23, 2009 08:01 PM

You should upgrade the exhaust. Roush off-road/legal, mbrp are best bang for your buck. Magnaflow didnt impress me but the ones on here who have it flaunt it like a new child is born to them so you could try that.
Best thing to do is keep stock tire size.

openclasspro#11 May 23, 2009 08:24 PM

4MPG by enlarging with the gott's mod?-i raise the bs flag on this one

2001 5.4 May 23, 2009 09:54 PM

I did the gotts mod on my dads 08 and it jumped 2 mpg's. if youre on the interstate then itl jump as much as 4

openclasspro#11 May 23, 2009 10:12 PM

if that were the case-ford would have it 3" from the factory to meet their cafe #'s...

puddle jumper May 24, 2009 09:59 AM

when i did my intake and exhaust it definately hepled out a couple mpgs

2001 5.4 May 24, 2009 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by openclasspro#11 (Post 3737799)
if that were the case-ford would have it 3" from the factory to meet their cafe #'s...

so you think were lying to sound cool on a forum...

openclasspro#11 May 24, 2009 08:38 PM

what was before and after mileage?

TruckGuy24 May 24, 2009 10:33 PM

Well consider this: Say someone drove their truck hard... Intakes usually help most at the mid to high rpm's if I am not mistaken so more air at the higher rpm's would result in better mileage. That doesn't mean it goes from 14/15-19/20 but it could be a gain from a low number to a 13-14 for example. Just a thought

MudTerrain May 25, 2009 12:02 PM


Originally Posted by openclasspro#11 (Post 3737666)
4MPG by enlarging with the gott's mod?-i raise the bs flag on this one

I agree. 4 MPG is a HUGE increase in MPG.

Get an actual average over several tanks, not just one were you decided to calculate your mileage on a highway trip.

lukenesser May 25, 2009 06:20 PM

Thanks to all the responses, I didn't want to start any trouble. Here are my numbers.
Purchased my truck in Oct 08. I have had 21 fill -ups and discarding the in town
(in winter) short drives, I accounted for 11 of the fillups. My highway avg mpg was 15.8.
Now , two fill ups since the Gotts - 18.4. The main difference I got when I originally stated " about 4 mpg" increase was between a 120 mile trip to the lumber store and back (at 55-60 mph) and the "old " mpg of 14.6 with two 1/2 tanks of E-85 freeway driving thru Ill and Ind (at 65-70 mph) to Louisville. The E-85 was probably the major difference along with higher speed. I notice much easier engine response and much less downshifts on hill while in "cruise control". I too believe "Ford should do this from the factory" or at least a TSB to inform owners of a change.
Thanks again for the replies.

openclasspro#11 May 25, 2009 07:34 PM

e85=lower btu content,less power-knew there was more to it than going from the factory 2.5"to 3",that alone will not give you a 20% gain in mpg


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands