Mpg
This post is my personal experience. This is not an endorsement nor a slam of any product.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
This post is my personal experience. This is not an endorsement nor a slam of any product.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.

Granny it with the stock tune and you might get 15.2 mpg. It's my personal best!!!
I drove like a corpse for a day and kept it under 2000 rpm and under 70mph.
Last tank on 87 Max was 14.72 mpg. I ran between 12.5 - 14 mpg before the XCal2. I would only get about 14 if I had any signifigant highway time. Did you datalog yet? (I haven't yet, so MT, don't shoot me, I'm gonna get the AF1 later this year...) I really have no idea, just putting letters on the page...
Next tank I'm switching to the 91 Max and see how that runs.
Next tank I'm switching to the 91 Max and see how that runs.
not trying to start anything here, but i picked up almost 2 mpg with the edge (premium vs superchips premium). This is similar to other claims made by other edge owners. The "majority" of responses back by xcal2 owners (TP and others) that i have seen is the same or worse mpg. There have been a few better mpg claims by xcal2 owners but that doesnt seem to be the trend, imho...
Im "sure" that there will be plenty of replies to refute or baxk up my "highly" unscientific analysis. But that is what this forum is about anyway....
Im "sure" that there will be plenty of replies to refute or baxk up my "highly" unscientific analysis. But that is what this forum is about anyway....
There are several factors that need to be figured out before i would blame anyone for bad mileage. Intake, exhaust, Fuel blend, driving habits, maintenance, and did you datalog. Datalog is probably the most important thing to do. I went down to Troyers and had my truck dyno tuned/datalogged. That is where he found problems with my air fuels. This goes to show that these trucks can be off from the get go. I do recall another member having bad mileage and his truck needed some adjustment and his truck picked up like 3 mpg's after that. Call Troyer.
Originally Posted by FX4ME2
There are several factors that need to be figured out before i would blame anyone for bad mileage. Intake, exhaust, Fuel blend, driving habits, maintenance, ...
1. Stock intake
2. Stock exhaust
3. Good 'Citgo' fuel for ALL tanks run with Xcal tunes, Cheap 87 octane from Sam's Club for stock tune.
4. Driving habits. Look at first post.
5. Maintenance. Truck only has 13k miles on it. Oil changed every 3000. What other maintenance needs to be done in that mileage?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
Once again, not 'blaming' anyone, just posting my experience.
1. Stock intake
2. Stock exhaust
3. Good 'Citgo' fuel for ALL tanks run with Xcal tunes, Cheap 87 octane from Sam's Club for stock tune.
4. Driving habits. Look at first post.
5. Maintenance. Truck only has 13k miles on it. Oil changed every 3000. What other maintenance needs to be done in that mileage?
1. Stock intake
2. Stock exhaust
3. Good 'Citgo' fuel for ALL tanks run with Xcal tunes, Cheap 87 octane from Sam's Club for stock tune.
4. Driving habits. Look at first post.
5. Maintenance. Truck only has 13k miles on it. Oil changed every 3000. What other maintenance needs to be done in that mileage?

I purchased an edge. Set it on level two, and drove the same. The gas mileage is identical to stock. I do drive a little more aggressive now though. I am in the Detroit area so I’m sure we are on the same type of fuel. I get a very consistent 14.5 –15.0 city & 15.0 – 16.0 hwy. I have no other performance mods. (Except my K&N, which is not installed and has been sitting in my garage since December. Maybe this weekend I will put it on) :o
Oh, I have a 5.4, 3.73 rear, FX4 Scab, 87 Octane.
Oh, I have a 5.4, 3.73 rear, FX4 Scab, 87 Octane.
I've not a slight .1 to .2 on normal driving, granted that may be offset by the heavier foot (even when I try not to).
Only on my first tank of 93 though. Time will tell.
Didnt really buy it expected the MPG increase though
Only on my first tank of 93 though. Time will tell.
Didnt really buy it expected the MPG increase though
Originally Posted by vader716
Didnt really buy it expected the MPG increase though
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
This post is my personal experience. This is not an endorsement nor a slam of any product.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.
My truck is an '04 regular cab 4x4 5.4. All of my driving is city driving.
When my truck was new, I could get almost 14 mpg driving relatively slow. For the last 6 months I have had an Xcal2 with 87 performance, 89 performance and 93 performance tunes. From the first tank of gas with the Xcal2, I've had a decrease in mpg no matter which tune I use. For the last couple of the months I have been using the 89 performance tune. I was getting around 11.7-12 mpg. Then I tried using the 'keep it under 2000 rpms' method that some people say to use. On that tank I got 12.7 mpg. Then I switched to the stock tune and drove normal, no hot rodding and no grannying. On that tank I got 13.7 mpg.
I always read on here about people that have an increase in mpgs with the Xcal2. Unfortunately that's not my experience.

been able to resist the temptation so far.
__________________
Jim
Jim



