Anyone have a SCREW with 2" AS and nothing on the rear?
#17
#21
#22
you would be happy with a 2.5 I just put a 2.5 on my 2004 and its just right 2004-2005 need 2.5 to be level.With the right backspacing you wont have any rubbing with 33/12.5.
#24
#25
To all who posted pics, did you remove the stock rear blocks? Also, I have to say, don't go with the 2.5 with nothing in the rear. It'll look like it's sagging. It seems the 2.5 AS looks best with the 2004 and 2005s that have the 4 leaf pack adding an extra 1/2" in the rear. Just my option. But, as I have a super rake going on (2wd with blocks in the back and nothing up front) so my opinion might not be valid. I liked the leveled look, but hate the nose up look.
#28
To all who posted pics, did you remove the stock rear blocks? Also, I have to say, don't go with the 2.5 with nothing in the rear. It'll look like it's sagging. It seems the 2.5 AS looks best with the 2004 and 2005s that have the 4 leaf pack adding an extra 1/2" in the rear. Just my option. But, as I have a super rake going on (2wd with blocks in the back and nothing up front) so my opinion might not be valid. I liked the leveled look, but hate the nose up look.
#29
I put 1 5/8" OEM blocks in the rear, not 3". Since I'm 2wd, it came without any blocks. I simply wanted a little more rake. As you can see in my signature, it does have a good rake, but doesn't really look any more drastic than the 04 and 05 models that had the 4 leaf packs and blocks in the back.
Ha, if I have 3" blocks in the back and nothing up front the nose would be dragging on the ground.
Ha, if I have 3" blocks in the back and nothing up front the nose would be dragging on the ground.