2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

0-60 6.5 run w/edge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #16  
fuzzie1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Take it to the track bro. Thats the best way to see your trucks progress. And yes that is movin pretty good. Congrats.

My Lightnings 0-60 is 1.87 seconds in full race trim ha ha. This will get better after the new pistons and more weight is pulled..........
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #17  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by fuzzie1
Take it to the track bro. Thats the best way to see your trucks progress. And yes that is movin pretty good. Congrats.

My Lightnings 0-60 is 1.87 seconds in full race trim ha ha. This will get better after the new pistons and more weight is pulled..........
1.87? No way, any videos?
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #18  
fuzzie1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Josiah
1.87? No way, any videos?
Here is the website I used to get that #. In the video below my 1/8 mile time was 6.30 and the mph was 110mph. I'm no mathmatition so I'm just going by this calculator bro.
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php


VIDOES

http://s85.photobucket.com/albums/k5...onallboost.flv

Pulling timing because the intercooler quit working about 1000'. This would've been a 9.8? on all boost.

http://s85.photobucket.com/albums/k5...Fuzzie1007.flv
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #19  
jlstang351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by fuzzie1
Take it to the track bro. Thats the best way to see your trucks progress. And yes that is movin pretty good. Congrats.

My Lightnings 0-60 is 1.87 seconds in full race trim ha ha. This will get better after the new pistons and more weight is pulled..........
That a Bad @ss truck brotha
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #20  
black07screw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
i kind of timed his video and its right around 7sec so I think it prob close
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #21  
johnnyd2723's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Originally Posted by fuzzie1
Here is the website I used to get that #. In the video below my 1/8 mile time was 6.30 and the mph was 110mph. I'm no mathmatition so I'm just going by this calculator bro.
http://www.wallaceracing.com/0-60_equation.php


VIDOES

http://s85.photobucket.com/albums/k5...onallboost.flv

Pulling timing because the intercooler quit working about 1000'. This would've been a 9.8? on all boost.

http://s85.photobucket.com/albums/k5...Fuzzie1007.flv
That's too cool What ($) do you have in that?
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #22  
RYAN24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Alabama
New time

Well I tested again tonight guys...... only difference is its 40 degrees colder than my 6.5 run..... I ran a 6.13

heres the vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmRqofGGDaY
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 01:57 AM
  #23  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
With the increased timing and very high shifting RPM, i cant imagine that being safe for your engine. I'd look into that.

However that is a very fast 0-60.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #24  
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,636
Likes: 264
From: Vernon, NY
That's nice.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:06 AM
  #25  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
VERY nice. I'm going to try your settings on 37's and 3.73's and get back to you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:19 AM
  #26  
mSaLL150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,862
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by Josiah
VERY nice. I'm going to try your settings on 37's and 3.73's and get back to you.
Shifting that high, i doubt you'll shift into 2nd until like 65mph with 37s and stock gears lol.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 02:20 AM
  #27  
RYAN24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Alabama
Originally Posted by Josiah
VERY nice. I'm going to try your settings on 37's and 3.73's and get back to you.
Nice ive got 33" MT's w/ 3.73's ...... With your bigger tires id would try the 93 octane LEVEL 2 with the 3.00+ timing first and then the Level 3 1.25+ to see which one you like better. Im assuming that extra torque from level 2 may help you more
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #28  
Moltenice's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: WA
Thats really fkin quick......... You could suprise the hell out of some cars off the line.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #29  
fuzzie1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by johnnyd2723
That's too cool What ($) do you have in that?
Dont know for sure. Dont really want to ha ha but if I had to throw a conservative # out there I'd say some where around $90,000
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #30  
RYAN24's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, Alabama
Originally Posted by fuzzie1
Dont know for sure. Dont really want to ha ha but if I had to throw a conservative # out there I'd say some where around $90,000
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.