2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

no light under the hood ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #46  
06LARIATSCREW's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Alamo Tx
i feel much better now i thought i was the only 1 with no light
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #47  
Tbird69's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
OK, I'm out. This is such a non issue that I've lost IQ points by simply posting in it. I'm going to stick to responding to threads started by people with LEGITIMATE complaints.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #48  
XLT-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern MA
I just love how when someone brings up a feature on other truck brands people say, "Bah, who needs that anyways." When someone brings up a feature their truck has, they proclaim it to be genious.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #49  
hmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 3
From: Kansas side of the greater KC area
Originally Posted by XLT-FX4
The lights that came on the older '88-'97 GM full sizes were awesome. They dismounted from under the hood and the retractable wire payed out from the housing. The wire was long enough to reach both rear tires to give you some light if you had to change one at night in the middle of nowhere, as well as to look around underneath the truck if something wasn't right.
Seeing how the quality of the GM makes they need such a light. So the poor chevy guy can see what broke down and left him on the side of the road in the dark.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #50  
SuperSport1985's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: IL
With or with out it its useless, that light even if you do have it doesnt light up everything so its pointless!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #51  
XLT-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern MA
Originally Posted by hmustang
Seeing how the quality of the GM makes they need such a light. So the poor chevy guy can see what broke down and left him on the side of the road in the dark.
Actually the '89 Chevy my father had which did a lot of towing and off-roading was passed on to me, then my uncle, then my cousin and was finally retired last year with just shy of 300,000 miles on it. I didn't like that truck much, but we damn sure got our money out of it. The trans. had a problem at about 30K that the dealer couldn't fix so they just replaced it. Yes, even the "glass" 700R-4 was never a problem again for the next 270K. Other than an idler arm every 70K or so, the occasional brake job, exhaust, tires, TPS, O2 sensors, etc. it was a trouble-free truck.

Even when it was junked it still ran fine...just a puff of blue smoke when first fired up. The body rot had finally won out and made it not worth fixing, and then rotted brake lines popped pinholes, etc. True, many of these trucks didn't see 100K, but the same can be said for Fords and Dodges of the same vintage. I've owned them all, and they're all the same overall.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #52  
powderburn2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
The main reason I don't carry a flashlight in my truck is there is no room. On my 2006 XL it doesn't have a console and the glove box is so small you couldn't carry a pack of gum in it. As big as the dash is you would think the glove box would be a little larger, I like a glove box big enough to lug a picnic ham in. I guess I could have a flashlight rolling all over the floor behind the seat. But I agree, An under the hood light would be nice. The one on my 84 F150 had a retractable wire and magnet and was damn handy one night when I had a flat tire.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.