2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Rafa26, Project Becoming A Reality .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #61  
offroadmaniac's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mcdover
Since it's been tuned! 464 rwhp means more than 505 at the flywheel. I didn't say ANY GT500, I said MINE! And all I have to do is drop another $385 on it and I'll pick up another 99 rwhp! As far as your mustang gt comment, why stop at the procharger. Hell go ahead and add NOS, strip the interior of everything but the drivers seat, put some drag slicks on the back. I could go on and on. You can mod anything if you got the money. I'll put my buddies Miata with a stroked 5.0L in it against a procharged mustang. Evolution Performance has their GT500 in the low 10's with their mods. So keep reading your mags and believeing everything you read, because you know if it's written down, it must be true.
Where in the world did I say I read in a mag that a procharged mustang will waste a gt500? Plus, I did mention that I bet it was crappy drivers that pulled that slow time with the gt500. Still, grab a gt for 25k, put 5k in it, and instantly deep in the 11s. Last time I looked, that's pretty cheap for an 11 sec car. I just think ford did a crappy job with the new gt500. Oh, and I'm sorry you still can't beat a z06. Only $385 huh, what are you waiting for? Why stop there? Add nos ,and strip out the interior like you said. Maybe you can keep up with a stock chevy then. How much will you have invested after that?
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #62  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Siemens Deka 83lbs High Impedance injectors.


 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #63  
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Murray , Kentucky
Z06: $75,000, 3130 LBS without driver
11.40 1/4 ... couple tenths better with Drag radials.

GT500: $60,000 maybe $65, 3920 without driver
Low 12's stock, high 11's with Drag radials.

up the boost, good tune, drag slicks... good exhaust, maybe ported heads.. and you'll be deep into the 11's...

Still cheaper than Z06...

Add boost to the LS7 and caboom! 11.0:1 compression.
Gt500 8.5:1

With bolt-ons, the GT 500 is more pwerful and faster than a Z06.... and cheaper.

Granted, you can do the same with a regular GT, built engine, and a whipple.. for much cheaper... but it's not a Shelby!
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #64  
Virilha's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: newark,nj
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
Z06: $75,000, 3130 LBS without driver
11.40 1/4 ... couple tenths better with Drag radials.

GT500: $60,000 maybe $65, 3920 without driver
Low 12's stock, high 11's with Drag radials.

up the boost, good tune, drag slicks... good exhaust, maybe ported heads.. and you'll be deep into the 11's...

Still cheaper than Z06...

Add boost to the LS7 and caboom! 11.0:1 compression.
Gt500 8.5:1

With bolt-ons, the GT 500 is more pwerful and faster than a Z06.... and cheaper.

Granted, you can do the same with a regular GT, built engine, and a whipple.. for much cheaper... but it's not a Shelby!
Why don't you start your own thread about that and don't bring your shi!# to Rafa26's thread which is a nice one about his project.
Stupid hijackers.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #65  
mcdover's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Deatsville, AL
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
Z06: $75,000, 3130 LBS without driver
11.40 1/4 ... couple tenths better with Drag radials.

GT500: $60,000 maybe $65, 3920 without driver
Low 12's stock, high 11's with Drag radials.

up the boost, good tune, drag slicks... good exhaust, maybe ported heads.. and you'll be deep into the 11's...

Still cheaper than Z06...

Add boost to the LS7 and caboom! 11.0:1 compression.
Gt500 8.5:1

With bolt-ons, the GT 500 is more pwerful and faster than a Z06.... and cheaper.

Granted, you can do the same with a regular GT, built engine, and a whipple.. for much cheaper... but it's not a Shelby!
Sorry for the hijack, Rafa.

Khendrix,

Amen! Glad to see somebody gets it!
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #66  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Instead of a SCT BA-2800-90mm MAF we decided for a Cobra 95mm machined MAF from Whipple.


 

Last edited by rafa26; Oct 30, 2006 at 06:16 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #67  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Just edited the post above, no SCT MAF anymore.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #68  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Dual Ford GT-40 fuel pumps. Dual pumps can flow 871LPH at 40 psi, 12.6 volts.



 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #69  
torturekilla's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
From: henderson, north carolina
whos building your engine?
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #70  
GerRod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
What an impressive project...can't wait to see the results when it's done...
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #71  
rafa26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by torturekilla
whos building your engine?
JDM
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #72  
assasinator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: clarksville tn
[QUOTE=rafa26]
Originally Posted by mcdover
The guy who wrote this is considered one the best tuners in the country:

"Well, the 2V head is nice, the ported versions work well. They make great low end torque. The 4V head is nice, they flow like crazy, and they make great high end power.

The 3V head is literally in the middle. It makes great low end torque AND great high rpm power. Dealing with the new Mustangs, I've seen the performance and the potential of the 3V head, and it rocks. If I were doing a scratch built custom motor for a killer hp Lightning and money was no object, it would definitely be a 3V head."
__________________
Sal Mennella
Power Surge Performance
Custom EECV Tuning Specialists - ALL Ford Vehicles
i agree totally. a year ago i was changing to 4v. now with newer porting and valve replacement techniques, 3v is approaching 4v close enough to reach my personal hp goals. anyone in theis forum is simply JDM, or livernois stage 2+ heads and cams away from 400+hp. a boosted 9 sec stock cammed mustang should be proof enough. rumors are that for may use a larger intake valve version in the upcoming BOSS mustang. just rumors though.

good ported 4v = 315cfm@.550 in/ 240+ exhaust @ .550
good ported 3v = 282cfm@.550 in/ 207 exhaust @ .550

obviuosly that's not GT heads, or fr500, and the numbers are representative. fugure the percent difference, and it's not really that much.

another comparo is a 05 gt bolt on reaches 300whp barely. an 04 mach1 reaches 325rwhp with non-cam bolt-ons. typically. different cams make a difference. anyway his decision to use 3v is based on sound principles.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #73  
assasinator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: clarksville tn
i'm not sure you guys are thinking power to weight. johhny lightning 2v trucks are running nines. rafa will have significantly more power. also more weight.

4436lbs. for the truck that runs 9.99@136. add a couple hundred hp and 600lbs and he is still faster.

rafa will run nines with ease. that puts him ahead of ever viper or z06 without MAJOR mods.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #74  
mcdover's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Deatsville, AL
I just want to see some timeslips. This truck is going to be awesome at the track. Not so sure about 9's, but still very awesome.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:28 AM
  #75  
05RoushMarkLT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
rafa, looking good! Can't wait to hear the results once you put your foot into it. Do you have an expected completion date?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 PM.