2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Continued: Edge 91 vs My/Bama 91 + No tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
asinatra's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Continued: Edge 91 vs My/Bama 91 + No tune

***edited to make the different runs stand out***

Using the edge... (sorry Josiah, im still playing)

No tune No tune No tune



Edge 91 Edge 91 Edge 91



My/BamaChips 91 *understand that my tune is a work in progress, but its getting better*
 

Last edited by asinatra; Feb 16, 2006 at 05:46 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #2  
expy03's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
From: Texas in the heart
Nice numbers. Thanks for the work.

Have you done any custom tuning on the EDGE? Or is that run with just the can tune?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #3  
afdt2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Like to know the RPM range of the Edge 91 tune vs the Bama one of 5553. Thanks.

Ed
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #4  
Smeezy 05 Screw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Mormon-ville
also it looks like the truck got a lot hotter during run#2
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #5  
smokestoneF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, On. Canada
nice asinatra!

thanks for sharing that
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #6  
928gt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: NC
Great "Apples to Apples" Info.. THANKS for sharing!
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
billindenver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: denver
Am I reading that right? The edge was 4843 rpm and the bama was 5553 rpm? I'm going to assume that's not the max rpm reached in the test....right?

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #8  
asinatra's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Originally Posted by expy03
Nice numbers. Thanks for the work.

Have you done any custom tuning on the EDGE? Or is that run with just the can tune?
Just the basic can tune. The only thing i have worked on in the SCT tune is extend the range of the spark and knock sensors and my transmssion makes me wet now.

Originally Posted by Smeezy 05 Screw
also it looks like the truck got a lot hotter during run#2
The edge displays *records* i had the e-fans off and at idle she just heated up because there was no airflow past the radiator


Originally Posted by billindenver
Am I reading that right? The edge was 4843 rpm and the bama was 5553 rpm? I'm going to assume that's not the max rpm reached in the test....right?

Bill
1st pic - no tune

2nd pic - edge tune

3rd pic - sct tune
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #9  
MosineeFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Nice work.........what do you have your WOT shifts at. Just curious how much overshoot there is. I'm guessing you have it set for 5400 or 5500rpm? Isn't that Edge worth having just for the gauges and the performance testing?

Also, I take it that the Edge photo is the one from a while ago. Did you have a chance to load the latest update, I know you had problems with the hard shifts and that was supposed to have been adressed with this latest update. That's probably a stupid question.........I'm guessing your having to much fun with that PRP.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 04:44 AM
  #10  
Kool Aid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN.
Did you adjust the Edge so it would rev to 5553, also?

If not, I don't think the test is fair.

Why not use the same screen shot for all three tests?

 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #11  
CCRider's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
It will take some effort to be sure each test setup is optimized, and a desire to be objective about each result. From the Edge hater. Pretty funny actually! C'mon asintra, you can do better....
 

Last edited by CCRider; Feb 17, 2006 at 08:26 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #12  
expy03's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
From: Texas in the heart
It will take some effort to be sure each test setup is optimized, and a desire to be objective about each result. From the Edge hater. Pretty funny actually! C'mon asintra, you can do better....
Good point.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #13  
billindenver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: denver
If you have followed his posts at all, you know that objectivity is far beyond his reach. He declared the SCT "FAR BETTER" before he even installed it. Now his objective test has the edge held 700 rpms lower...please.

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
asinatra's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,457
Likes: 0
From: Central California
You guys are so ***-backwards and don't get anything, i rather just give up than try to explain what is going on.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #15  
CCRider's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
Originally Posted by asinatra
You guys are so ***-backwards and don't get anything, i rather just give up than try to explain what is going on.
C'mon asintra, I know you are only 19, but you are a pretty smart guy. Why don't you do us, and you a favor and do it right! We're all willing to know the real scoop. Calling names doesn't lend credibility to your posts, taking more objective approach will. So far you are "Frequently in error, and seldom in doubt"
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.