2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

dyno results after xcal 2

Old Nov 4, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #16  
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Murray , Kentucky
Im gonna have to find a differend exhaust shop.

I tried to jack up the truck and get under it with a sawz-all to cut the rear cats off... Wrong!
I cant get the truck high enough to get my big azz sawzall under there...

Actually, I can cut off the very rear weld, behind the cats, but between the first and second set, I cant reach it with the blade. There is a transmission crossmember there that also doesn't help much. Wish I had a plasma torch.. they'd be off already.

Edit: Ohhh.. I know somebody with a plasma torch!
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #17  
Justins FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
i didnt gain 30 tq the look how the sheet is . its really like 5-7 tq but the toryer tune is higher in the 5-5.5k rpm range and the other one was higher in the 4- 5k range

the hp gain was like 11 and was the same way lower than tp on the top end but stronger in the 4-4.75k
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 07:59 AM
  #18  
gobra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0

first run was just normal 93 per toyer tune. max power= 227.95 torque= 288.35

it was running a little lean so i added 4% richer on the tune from the xcal and got hp= 233.86 torque= 318.99
Troyer tune = 288.35
your tune = 318.99

318.99 - 288.35= 30.64. Not trying to bust you or anything but just trying to get the facts straight. Is there a typo? Thanks for the info though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #19  
Justins FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
Originally Posted by gobra
Troyer tune = 288.35
your tune = 318.99

318.99 - 288.35= 30.64. Not trying to bust you or anything but just trying to get the facts straight. Is there a typo? Thanks for the info though.
i also had a run that said 410 hp 360 tq. just look at the graph the actual line never goes over the 300 mark. the 318 came from the spike at the begining of therun and i didnt realize it till after i posted it
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #20  
smokestoneF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, On. Canada
Originally Posted by wheelerfreak
OK time for a stupid question, I thought ideal AF was 14.7? So a AF of 13.5 would be rich(er) and 15 would be lean? Or is the opposite?
Nope
That's right
14.7 is stoichiometric.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #21  
gobra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Justins FX4
i also had a run that said 410 hp 360 tq. just look at the graph the actual line never goes over the 300 mark. the 318 came from the spike at the begining of therun and i didnt realize it till after i posted it
Ok the graph is hard to see. So what was your 93 troyer tune numbers? or better yet, can you email me the dynojet file? pbutts at gmaildotcom.

BTW, I see you are in Town Creek (I live in Pell City). Any more Goode brothers/sons coming up? RTR!
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #22  
flanaganman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: CS of A
i used a sawzall it was easy
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #23  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by PiggNFord
I agree 100%. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be quicker, but my truck felt strong right out of the gate. Mine was a 2/05 build date.
I want to find a local track and see what I am running stock. Anyone know of a track located in Northern California (near Sacramento).
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #24  
jwlionking's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Marc Carpenter
13.5 is NOT a good A/F, however there a lot of trucks out there running a lot leaner in the stock form. Mine was one and it was actully around 14.5 -15.0..
If you attempted to remove fuel and it did just the opposite I suggest you check your MAF. What was the voltage at WOT? It may not be transitioning properly because of low voltage..
Would you educate me on how I could test this on my truck? Would it be possible to run rich and not set off a code and cause poor fuel economy?
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 12:33 AM
  #25  
Justins FX4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: North Alabama
Originally Posted by gobra
Ok the graph is hard to see. So what was your 93 troyer tune numbers? or better yet, can you email me the dynojet file? pbutts at gmaildotcom.

BTW, I see you are in Town Creek (I live in Pell City). Any more Goode brothers/sons coming up? RTR!
nah no more goodes for a while im just 20 so it wasnt that long ago since i played. but all the goodes i grew up with sucked lol

you have mail
 

Last edited by Justins FX4; Nov 6, 2005 at 12:37 AM.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.