dyno results after xcal 2
Im gonna have to find a differend exhaust shop.
I tried to jack up the truck and get under it with a sawz-all to cut the rear cats off... Wrong!
I cant get the truck high enough to get my big azz sawzall under there...
Actually, I can cut off the very rear weld, behind the cats, but between the first and second set, I cant reach it with the blade. There is a transmission crossmember there that also doesn't help much. Wish I had a plasma torch.. they'd be off already.
Edit: Ohhh.. I know somebody with a plasma torch!
I tried to jack up the truck and get under it with a sawz-all to cut the rear cats off... Wrong!
I cant get the truck high enough to get my big azz sawzall under there...
Actually, I can cut off the very rear weld, behind the cats, but between the first and second set, I cant reach it with the blade. There is a transmission crossmember there that also doesn't help much. Wish I had a plasma torch.. they'd be off already.
Edit: Ohhh.. I know somebody with a plasma torch!
i didnt gain 30 tq the look how the sheet is . its really like 5-7 tq but the toryer tune is higher in the 5-5.5k rpm range and the other one was higher in the 4- 5k range
the hp gain was like 11 and was the same way lower than tp on the top end but stronger in the 4-4.75k
the hp gain was like 11 and was the same way lower than tp on the top end but stronger in the 4-4.75k
first run was just normal 93 per toyer tune. max power= 227.95 torque= 288.35
it was running a little lean so i added 4% richer on the tune from the xcal and got hp= 233.86 torque= 318.99
your tune = 318.99
318.99 - 288.35= 30.64. Not trying to bust you or anything but just trying to get the facts straight. Is there a typo? Thanks for the info though.
Originally Posted by gobra
Troyer tune = 288.35
your tune = 318.99
318.99 - 288.35= 30.64. Not trying to bust you or anything but just trying to get the facts straight. Is there a typo? Thanks for the info though.
your tune = 318.99
318.99 - 288.35= 30.64. Not trying to bust you or anything but just trying to get the facts straight. Is there a typo? Thanks for the info though.
Originally Posted by wheelerfreak
OK time for a stupid question, I thought ideal AF was 14.7? So a AF of 13.5 would be rich(er) and 15 would be lean? Or is the opposite?
That's right
14.7 is stoichiometric.
Originally Posted by Justins FX4
i also had a run that said 410 hp 360 tq. just look at the graph the actual line never goes over the 300 mark. the 318 came from the spike at the begining of therun and i didnt realize it till after i posted it
BTW, I see you are in Town Creek (I live in Pell City). Any more Goode brothers/sons coming up? RTR!
Originally Posted by PiggNFord
I agree 100%. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be quicker, but my truck felt strong right out of the gate. Mine was a 2/05 build date.
Originally Posted by Marc Carpenter
13.5 is NOT a good A/F, however there a lot of trucks out there running a lot leaner in the stock form. Mine was one and it was actully around 14.5 -15.0..
If you attempted to remove fuel and it did just the opposite I suggest you check your MAF. What was the voltage at WOT? It may not be transitioning properly because of low voltage..
If you attempted to remove fuel and it did just the opposite I suggest you check your MAF. What was the voltage at WOT? It may not be transitioning properly because of low voltage..
Originally Posted by gobra
Ok the graph is hard to see. So what was your 93 troyer tune numbers? or better yet, can you email me the dynojet file? pbutts at gmaildotcom.
BTW, I see you are in Town Creek (I live in Pell City). Any more Goode brothers/sons coming up? RTR!
BTW, I see you are in Town Creek (I live in Pell City). Any more Goode brothers/sons coming up? RTR!
you have mail
Last edited by Justins FX4; Nov 6, 2005 at 12:37 AM.



