Tire pressure for snow/slush?
#1
Tire pressure for snow/slush?
Hi...I have a 2wd '92 with standard 245/75 R15 tires. Book recommends 41 rear, 35psi front but I've had the worst time with traction in my slushy street. I need to get sandbags but everyone's been out of stock and I haven't been driving too much because of the traction, I also have a slight coolant leak since the colder weather's been happening (It's now +2 C so everything's wet and yuk)
I dropped tire pressure to 30-35 psi all round and it seems better, but if I do any significant driving, I ought to put a bit more back in, right? As I understand it, underinflation can lead to tires overheating, right?
I dropped tire pressure to 30-35 psi all round and it seems better, but if I do any significant driving, I ought to put a bit more back in, right? As I understand it, underinflation can lead to tires overheating, right?
#2
The tires need to be inflated to manufacturer's specs no matter what! Underinflation leads to the outside of the tire wearing too fast and to driving on the sidewall when you turn. Overinflation leads to the center wearing too fast and not as much rubber on the road as is recommended. Get the sand bags and remember smooth on the gas
#4
#5
Um....
Originally Posted by h8louzn
You should run the pressure that the tire says, not always what the truck says!
If you don't think so, look at all the explorers that had blowouts.
I know some will say it was the tires, but it was not the tire it WAS the pressure ford said to run them at...
If you don't think so, look at all the explorers that had blowouts.
I know some will say it was the tires, but it was not the tire it WAS the pressure ford said to run them at...
Truckin
#6
Originally Posted by truckinghard11
Um nope, it's been proven that it was a bad batch of tires. The compound sat around too long, and a bad call was made to produce tires with it. Firestone is still a great tire, just one bad call. If it was because of the recommended psi there would be a million of them crashed. You should always follow vehicle spec.
Truckin
Truckin
Also if it had LT tires OE and you put P series on, you would not want to put 40psi in a tire with a max of 35.
Last edited by kingfish51; 12-10-2006 at 11:07 AM.
#7
Originally Posted by truckinghard11
Um nope, it's been proven that it was a bad batch of tires. The compound sat around too long, and a bad call was made to produce tires with it. Firestone is still a great tire, just one bad call. If it was because of the recommended psi there would be a million of them crashed. You should always follow vehicle spec.
Truckin
Truckin
All I can tell you is I had a fleet of 150 vehicles and we did a study as well.
We had chevy trucks with the same tire on them and never a problem...
Also when you put a load on a tire that is at "28 psi" which is what "ford" said to run them at it gets real hot and (BOOM)..
I also know that firestone is the smaller of the two companies and since they are both in bed together it is easy to give up the smaller of the two..
Kingfish is very much right here!
Trending Topics
#8
Firestone knew about the problems,it mostly happened in warmer climates...
you never heard about all the overseas blowout have ya...they knew...but until it happened here,thats when they did something about it...anyhow..
unless your mudding,rock climbing or drag racing,or a nascar racer..lol run the tire at specs
h8louzn,where is your pic gallery? i got a 03 too...you do any mods yet?
you never heard about all the overseas blowout have ya...they knew...but until it happened here,thats when they did something about it...anyhow..
unless your mudding,rock climbing or drag racing,or a nascar racer..lol run the tire at specs
h8louzn,where is your pic gallery? i got a 03 too...you do any mods yet?
Last edited by SCOTTE`screw; 12-10-2006 at 11:39 AM.
#9
Originally Posted by h8louzn
I know very well what the outcome was, or should I say what the goverment want's you to think..
All I can tell you is I had a fleet of 150 vehicles and we did a study as well.
We had chevy trucks with the same tire on them and never a problem...
Also when you put a load on a tire that is at "28 psi" which is what "ford" said to run them at it gets real hot and (BOOM)..
I also know that firestone is the smaller of the two companies and since they are both in bed together it is easy to give up the smaller of the two..
Kingfish is very much right here!
All I can tell you is I had a fleet of 150 vehicles and we did a study as well.
We had chevy trucks with the same tire on them and never a problem...
Also when you put a load on a tire that is at "28 psi" which is what "ford" said to run them at it gets real hot and (BOOM)..
I also know that firestone is the smaller of the two companies and since they are both in bed together it is easy to give up the smaller of the two..
Kingfish is very much right here!
Ford also was the one hurt the most both on reputation and monetarily.
I have had Firestones on F150s before, and honestly did not like them. They were okay on dry road, but as soon as you had wet road and hit the brakes, they would lock up and slide. Never had that problem with BFG or Goodyears.
#10
Tire pressure
I personaly think you should experiment with your pressures. If you are carrying a load,definatly put more air in the rears. But running empty,runn 32 in the rear tires. It will not affect tire wear,and you will have better traction and smoother ride. If you are going to be carrying heavy loads alot,upgrade to LT rated tires. I run 35 psi in the front and 32 in the rear of my truck and i get even tire wear and good traction and ride.
#11
Last edited by h8louzn; 12-10-2006 at 05:34 PM.
#12
Thanks everyone. When I bought the truck it had two good tires and two worn, so I got new tires for the worn ones, the good ones - don't know the load range spec/system but it was rated max 50 psi so they recommended I go with similar so I could theoretically go for the high psi if I was carrying a lot of stuff (this is our second car, the home reno ****ekicker so come spring I might be hauling lots....
So ok, factory/ door label specs....(in Australia, where I used to live, it was widely recommended to go higher than most door label specs, can't remember the reason) but keep in mind the tires themselves - I don't think they specify a minimum pressure so the factory spec is what I should follow as a minimum...is how I'm reading it. Thanks again.
So ok, factory/ door label specs....(in Australia, where I used to live, it was widely recommended to go higher than most door label specs, can't remember the reason) but keep in mind the tires themselves - I don't think they specify a minimum pressure so the factory spec is what I should follow as a minimum...is how I'm reading it. Thanks again.
#13
Originally Posted by pjb999@yahoo.co
Thanks everyone. When I bought the truck it had two good tires and two worn, so I got new tires for the worn ones, the good ones - don't know the load range spec/system but it was rated max 50 psi so they recommended I go with similar so I could theoretically go for the high psi if I was carrying a lot of stuff (this is our second car, the home reno ****ekicker so come spring I might be hauling lots....
So ok, factory/ door label specs....(in Australia, where I used to live, it was widely recommended to go higher than most door label specs, can't remember the reason) but keep in mind the tires themselves - I don't think they specify a minimum pressure so the factory spec is what I should follow as a minimum...is how I'm reading it. Thanks again.
So ok, factory/ door label specs....(in Australia, where I used to live, it was widely recommended to go higher than most door label specs, can't remember the reason) but keep in mind the tires themselves - I don't think they specify a minimum pressure so the factory spec is what I should follow as a minimum...is how I'm reading it. Thanks again.