4.6 Romeo vs Windsor in HP

  #1  
Old 07-17-1999, 04:20 PM
Tina's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 4.6 Romeo vs Windsor in HP

I've just had someone tell me that if you add the same mods to the Romeo & the Windsor that you Would NOT get the same amount of HP!! I asked about adding the K&N air filter, cat-back muffler and a superchip. All 3 mods are the exact same. I know that these two engines are not built the same way but would that be enough to cause a noticable difference in HP gained from the mods??? Help, I need info to go back with!!

------------------
97F150 XLT SC 4x4 Flairside 4.6 V8 5sp Dk Toreador Red, 3.55LS
ARE tonneau cover, p255/70rx16 tires (came w/235), Superchip
Pioneer CD w/4 Polk Speakers & Clarion APA5240amp, skid plates
bed liner, side window deflectors, reese hitch, K&N air filter
40s-2chamber Flowmaster, Bosch +4 spark plugs, rustproofing
Better Built Stainless nerf bars


 
  #2  
Old 07-17-1999, 04:55 PM
94 F-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tina,
I don't know the answer to your question, but I thought you might be interested to know I just acquired a '82 Mustang with the 351 Windsor and a 5 speed. It's going to be a project car, not quite sure where I"m going to go with it yet. I'll keep ya posted!!

Neal
P.S.......love a woman that knows her trucks!

------------------
'94 F-150, 4.9 6cyl., Pioneer CD, 400 Watt amp, and a couple speakers to boot! K&N FIPK, Mangecor 8mm wires. Gibson 3" Side Swept, MSD Blaster Coil. Soon to come; Superchip. Est. 200 hp 300ft/lb. Torque! Not bad for a straight 6!! New project: '82 Stang, 351 Windsor. I'll keep ya posted.

 
  #3  
Old 07-19-1999, 08:19 AM
Tina's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

94F-150: Hey, good luck with that mustang

NOW if I can just get someone that knows anything about HP Hey, how about Mike T.???? He should at least know about how the chip affects the windsor & romeo engines.
 
  #4  
Old 07-19-1999, 02:35 PM
nomo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: OK
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Well, technically, no engine puts out the same power as any other. I wonder if they were just being **** (like us engineers can be) or if they have some inside info. Keep us updated on what you find.

BTW, which was supposed to be better?

Neal


------------------
1997 4x4 Expedition- 4.6L, true dual exhaust w/glass-packs, K&N air filter, SuperChip, airbox mods, Edelbrock shocks, 285/75R16 BFG ATs, Optima "T-Bone" wheels, and Clarion In-dash CD player: http://members.visualcities.com/NoMo

 
  #5  
Old 07-19-1999, 02:43 PM
Triton46's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

How can I tell which engine I have? I have the 4.6L and the truck is from the KC plant.

------------------
The Truck: 1997 Black F-150 Flareside. Regular Cab ORP and Towing Package
The Mods: K&N Filter, Eurolid Hard Tonneau and Ford Bug Deflector.
The Site:
Triton's 4.6 Liter Web Page
www.mindspring.com/~acbradley/index.html

 
  #6  
Old 07-19-1999, 02:57 PM
nomo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: OK
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

The 8th digit of your VIN is the engine code.

W=Romeo
6=Windsor

Yes, the W really is the Romeo engine code- NOT Windsor.


Neal

------------------
1997 4x4 Expedition- 4.6L, true dual exhaust w/glass-packs, K&N air filter, SuperChip, airbox mods, Edelbrock shocks, 285/75R16 BFG ATs, Optima "T-Bone" wheels, and Clarion In-dash CD player: http://members.visualcities.com/NoMo

 
  #7  
Old 07-20-1999, 08:29 AM
Tina's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The windsor looks like it's better than the romeo. Windsor has all the heavyer duty parts added. From what I read of the romeo it seems to use more gas, more oil and not last as long. But I seem to remember those were long term figures.

Can anyone get Mike over here to answer about HP????
 
  #8  
Old 07-20-1999, 01:31 PM
nomo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: OK
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

How long term? So far, it's only got 32,000, but it's running real strong. No oil usage and economy seems to be pretty good (14/18) considering the way it gets driven.

Which one was supposed to respond to the mods with more HP?

Neal

------------------
1997 4x4 Expedition- 4.6L, true dual exhaust w/glass-packs, K&N air filter, SuperChip, airbox mods, Edelbrock shocks, 285/75R16 BFG ATs, Optima "T-Bone" wheels, and Clarion In-dash CD player: http://members.visualcities.com/NoMo



[This message has been edited by nomo (edited 07-20-1999).]
 
  #9  
Old 07-20-1999, 01:37 PM
riclaur's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What's the valid resource this generalization comes from?
 
  #10  
Old 07-20-1999, 04:16 PM
Tina's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

HP and the mods to these engines is what I'm tring to find out!! The blanket statement the guy made to me was that "adding mods to these 2 engines caused different HP gains" I didn't know what he was talking about, so here I am asking.

The info I've read on these two engines is that the windsor was made to remove the problems that the romeo has had. There is even info here but you have to search back close to the beginning of the year.

NoMo, I like that picture of the dolfins, cool. I didn't see your 93 though Did I miss it somehow?


[This message has been edited by Tina (edited 07-20-1999).]
 
  #11  
Old 07-20-1999, 05:25 PM
ezyonthegas's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Tina,

My F-150 was manufactured in April of 99 and has the "Romeo" engine designation as identified by the VIN. I have checked into the mustang site (corral) and have found nothing regarding the engine differences and these guys speak HP from every breath. If in fact the Windsor was developed to replace the "faulty" romeo, it appears they have not ceased the manufacture of our problem child. I think someone is blowing smoke but now you have me thinking about this also.

Karl
 
  #12  
Old 07-20-1999, 06:24 PM
nomo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: OK
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Thanks. No, you didn't miss it. Initially, I was waiting to get it painted before taking/posting pictures. Well, it's been painted for a couple of months now, so I guess I'm just lazy. But, aren't you glad the new trucks have the ECU located where they do? It was kind of a pain getting the Superchip in the old '93. I plan on updating the entire site sometime. It may have to wait until this winter (or end of fishing weather) though.

BTW, Tim Alsop says "there should be a sticker on the driver's side cam cover that identifies the engine plant. Romeo has a round sticker, Windsor has a square sticker." There is some debate as to whether W=Romeo or not. I'm hoping Tim can clear that up for sure. Still no definitive "proof" of HP differences though.

Neal


------------------
1997 4x4 Expedition- 4.6L, true dual exhaust w/glass-packs, K&N air filter, SuperChip, airbox mods, Edelbrock shocks, 285/75R16 BFG ATs, Optima "T-Bone" wheels, and Clarion In-dash CD player: http://members.visualcities.com/NoMo

 
  #13  
Old 07-20-1999, 08:23 PM
fast46triton's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Fast46TritonVille
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I just checked, I have the W Code= Romeo!
It seems to run stronger than my 97' which I forgot which engine it is {romeo or windsor}
I hope, tina, that the Windsor is a better engine! My romeo 4.6 runs awesome!

------------------
1999 Ford F150 XLT Supercab, Shortbed, 4x2, 4 wheel disc brakes/4 wheel Anti-Lock Brakes, Cloth Seats, Amazon green, 16" All season tires, Soft Tonneau Cover, CD Player, 4.6 liter Triton V8, 3:55 ls, towing package, 4 speed auto, K&N Airfilter
Future Mods:
1)Superchip
2)Airbox Mod
3)Flowmaster Exhaust

Estimated Quarter Mile Time by the use of a calculator and websites:
ET: 16.7 Trap Speed: 83-84mph

Fast46Triton

The Terminator!

 
  #14  
Old 07-20-1999, 08:31 PM
riclaur's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Isn't the Windsor engine the one with the piston slap? I haven't heard of any problems with the Romeo. It's a large company with a large demand for engines.(multiple plants for demand) I don't think one engine was built better than the other.
 
  #15  
Old 07-20-1999, 09:19 PM
riclaur's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I just finished a search of the NHTSA web-site for F150 model years '97,'98,'99 for TSB 96-8-6 which is supposedly the TSB referenced in a March post that tells about the differences between the Romeo and Windsor engines and could not find it. Any other ideas on how to locate it?
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 4.6 Romeo vs Windsor in HP



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.