Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > V8 Engines
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2010, 01:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Schenectady, NY
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F-150
Posts: 511
50 mpg in the 1950's!

I used to work with a guy who said a friend of his bought a car in the 1950's that got 50 mpg. Apparently it was equipped with an experimental carburator, and the people responsible for that carburator made him give it back. If the technology for 50 mpg were available in the 1950's, I bet we could get pretty good mpg these days. Does anyone have any similar experiences, or know anyone who has? I felt obligated to post on here, since we drive vehicles with some of the worst mpg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2010, 02:04 AM
glc glc is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Vehicle: 2003 Ford F150
Posts: 29,086
Total BS. Never happened.

http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm
__________________
2003 F-150 XL RCSB 2wd 4.2 M5OD 3.55 LS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2010, 02:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Schenectady, NY
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F-150
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by glc View Post
That link leads to some interesting reading. The guy who told me this does seem like he enjoys hearing himself talk, just wondering if there were any similar stories. I've been thinking of making my next truck a diesel so that I can convert to using cooking oil as fuel, but I've done some reading and there are some negatives to it, such as filtering food out of used oil, and also smelling like french fries.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2010, 07:10 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Boise,Idaho
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F150 4X4
Posts: 86
People usually claim 100 MPG's. I have been hearing these stories all my life.
__________________
1997 Ford F150 XLT 4X4 SCAB/ 4.6L V-8/3.55 LS/ Trans- 4R70W/ Magnaflow SI/SO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2010, 09:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis (Out in the woods)
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F250 6.8
Posts: 5,254
I thought it was the 200 mpg carb....

FWIW, Ford did have a diesel Escort in the early 80s that did better than 40 mpg at 55 mph, especially the 5-speed manual transmission version.
__________________
If your original owner's manual is missing, download a soft copy from www.fleet.ford.com under the MAINTENANCE tab.

1995 Mustang GT Convertible, only 68K miles.
200 Ford Contour Daily drive.
2001 F250 SD, 6.8L, 4 X4.
2007 Mercury Mariner AWD - Wifey's daily driver

Last edited by projectSHO89; 11-15-2010 at 09:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2010, 11:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abilene
Vehicle: 02 5.4 SuperCrew
Posts: 472
A friend has a 70's VW diesel Golf and he gets over 50 mpg and drives it to work daily. He like's to rub it in that he fills up once a month.

Heck my old 88 Cutlass got over 33 mpg.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2010, 01:52 PM
glc glc is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Vehicle: 2003 Ford F150
Posts: 29,086
Sounds quite possible with a 4 banger in the Cutlass.
__________________
2003 F-150 XL RCSB 2wd 4.2 M5OD 3.55 LS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2010, 03:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So. Texas
Posts: 1,554
Quote:
Sounds quite possible with a 4 banger in the Cutlass.
They actually put a 4 banger in the Cutlass- the Quad Four to be exact. My girls aunt had one. I remember one day she was at the house and I asked her if she wanted me to check under the hood , she was single at the time. She told me no, it was an Oldsmobile and you don't have to do that. I lifted the hood and checked the oil- there was none on the stick. The two front tires had cord showing and she couldn't believe it. I put 3 qts of oil in it and the she told me she had never had it changed since new. It had 43,000 miles on the factory fill. It didn't last long after the second oil change and she is now driving a Ranger that gets changed every 3 months regardless if she drives it or not. She LOVES her Ranger.

Yeah those 100 mile per gallon carbs worked really good until somebody had to mention thermal dynamics. So far, nobody has been able to change the laws of physics but they keep trying...kinda like running yer engine on water.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2010, 06:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Schenectady, NY
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F-150
Posts: 511
I didn't know that kind of mpgs were available in the '80's and '70's, that's really good mpg on that diesel golf. I didn't know they made a diesel escort either.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2010, 06:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calvert Co., MD
Vehicle: 2012 Ford F150
Posts: 434
Anybody remember the "vapor Jet" from the 70's? (It didn't work either)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-15-2010, 10:24 PM
Technical Article Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Coast, California
Vehicle: 1999 F150 4X4
Posts: 964
My first car was a '65 Austin-Healy Sprite (MG Midget), which got close to 40mpg ... 1500 lb car w/ 62 cid 4-banger
__________________


You gotta love a truck the color of dirt ...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-15-2010, 10:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Schenectady, NY
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F-150
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlaner View Post
My first car was a '65 Austin-Healy Sprite (MG Midget), which got close to 40mpg ... 1500 lb car w/ 62 cid 4-banger
Yeah I drove an MG once, pretty fun car. I didn't know the gas mileage on them is that good. I guess it should be at about the third the weight of my truck.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2010, 10:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC, Ct & NC
Vehicle: 2007 Ford F-150
Posts: 3,457
Send a message via AIM to pmason718
I'm too young for this thread, lol I'm just joking
__________________


2007 Red Fire Metallic FX2 Sport
5.4 V8 3.55
Pioneer Z2 /w Bluetooth, XM Sat, & Nav Traffic
Alpine PKG-RSE2 Overhead Monitor
Alpine MRP-M450 Mono Amp 400w
Alpine MRP-F300 4ch Amp 50W
Q-Logic QL-C1FTX110 Custom Sub Enclosure
JL 10W3v3-2 Sub
Polk db571 Front & Rear Door Speakers
Hella LED tail and 3rd brake lights
4300k Digital HID's
23" Customized Saleen Wheels
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-20-2010, 02:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiaronate View Post
I used to work with a guy who said a friend of his bought a car in the 1950's that got 50 mpg. Apparently it was equipped with an experimental carburator, and the people responsible for that carburator made him give it back. If the technology for 50 mpg were available in the 1950's, I bet we could get pretty good mpg these days. Does anyone have any similar experiences, or know anyone who has? I felt obligated to post on here, since we drive vehicles with some of the worst mpg.
In the early 70's the Woods Brothers Nascar team had a carburater that got 70 mpg! An oil company bought the patent and that was the end of that.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Missouri
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F250
Posts: 6,172
^ Sure they did.
__________________
2006 F250 Lariat FX4 6.0 PSD
Performance: EGR delete, SCT tuned, 3.5" straight pipe
Other mods: Nathan Airchime K5HA locomotive horns

Videos:
Nathan Airchime K5HA - short burst
Nathan Airchime K5HA - time delay
F150 Exhaust Borla true dual X pipe
Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 04:34 PM


 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.





This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
 
Contact Us Advertising Privacy Statement Terms of Service Jobs Forum Text Archives
Emails & Contact Details