online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > V8 Engines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 10-05-2008, 01:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitch View Post
im not good at math, but im sure you'll be irritated about the time and money for double checking your cams.
im sure i will be shouldnt i be at around 350whp N/A

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 10-05-2008, 01:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F150
Posts: 3,898
Send a message via ICQ to Klitch
sprayed? yeah
__________________

built and blueprinted Lightning powerplant with p&p heads, race built 4r70w by Darrin @ BC-Automotive
Avoid Rods C.A.R.S. 3929 W Clearwater Ave, Kennewick, WA. screwed me on a bad transmission "built" by State Transmission of Pasco, Wa. avoid www.Engineworldusa.com, junk import motors.
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 10-05-2008, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
so i should have 350whp on spray..or N/A
__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
i would think 350 to the ground without spray is about right for what you have.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by built54 View Post
i would think 350 to the ground without spray is about right for what you have.
without spray i only put down 270hp/301tq
__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
what a/f are you at and how much timing
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
i believe 21* timing tried to go more/less..truck didnt like it..a/f is right about 11.5 or so
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 10-05-2008, 05:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
dang... you should be making more. did you data log those dyno runs?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
i know i should..my tuner thinks it may be cam timing or the chains weren't lined up properly.. do u think that could cause that much of a power loss..im not sure about the datalogging since the tuner took care of it
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
built, what do u think could be the problem(s) for that much of a power loss
Reply With Quote
  #221  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
I Think if the timing chains were not where they should be, you would have a noticeable problem at idle, or normal driving...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:13 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
Quote:
Originally Posted by built54 View Post
I Think if the timing chains were not where they should be, you would have a noticeable problem at idle, or normal driving...
do you mean like the truck would die sometimes and what problem would it be with normal driving as u say..if its not the cams what else could it be
__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
I would think it would run really rough. have you done a compression test?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: fairview heights,IL
Vehicle: 2003 ford f150
Posts: 956
yes just 2 days ago i put in new NGK TR6 and i had 140-150 psi in all cylinders
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 10-05-2008, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Farmington, MO
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F150
Posts: 6,140
well with my pi head swap, comp cams, long tubes, injectors, and 90mm maf, I put down 265/325. that was with my heavy tires and wheels, and its 4wd... so that was roughly 325 flywheel hp.
__________________
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives