online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > V6 Engines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-01-2008, 04:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
my friend has a single cab silverado with a 4.8, his best time is a 15.6. His is lighter than most so the extra cabs probably run a 15.8 or so.

It's decently quick but's that's all the 4.6L f150 would have to beat

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-03-2008, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neeseius
'TECH' stated earlier that chevy does not make a better motor with that kind of displacement, that's incorrect unless he was just referring to what s10s or silverados have. Chevy replaced the 4.3 with a 4.2L I6, it makes 295HP and is used in the trailblazers and might make their way into the silverados to replace the 4.3s. But I have to agree with TECH that GM was very stupid with with their plastic injector assemblys, a very bad design, and not upgradable. More on that in a second.
I said, "it's not a bad engine but they don't build a better one", refering to whatever it's in and that's only what i've seen so, my opinion, not incorrect. I don't disagree with you on the I6 though (except if you want to see COP failures like Ford).
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-03-2008, 03:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: mass.
Vehicle: 2001 ford 250
Posts: 1,955
i got to go with the 3.9 magnum. ive had 2 dakotas with over 150k. not the most powerful engine ever but... very reliable. never gave me a single problem.

Last edited by keith97xlt; 03-03-2008 at 03:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-04-2008, 02:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith97xlt
i got to go with the 3.9 magnum. ive had 2 dakotas with over 150k. not the most powerful engine ever but... very reliable. never gave me a single problem.
The engine itself is reliable but the rest of the vehicle is an abortion IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-04-2008, 07:45 PM
Technical Article Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vernon, NY
Vehicle: 2007 Ford F150
Posts: 4,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by TECHDOC
The engine itself is reliable but the rest of the vehicle is an abortion IMO.
My 2000 Dakota never had rust.

That's because it sits in a garage 98% of it's life and I had the underbody painted with regular car paint. The paint is made by DuPont and the name of the paint is Midnight Black Metallic C/C. Nothing like looking at the underbody when it's just as nice as the sheet metal.

The dude who did it, only charged me $450... and he sanded the entire frame down, and all of the parts, etc... and then painted it. I think it took him a total of about 14 hours... but being he's a friend, he cut the labor out a lot. He's also the one who's gonna help me start learning to paint. Who knows, I might do side work for him one day if I get good.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-05-2008, 06:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManualF150
My 2000 Dakota never had rust.

That's because it sits in a garage 98% of it's life and I had the underbody painted with regular car paint. The paint is made by DuPont and the name of the paint is Midnight Black Metallic C/C. Nothing like looking at the underbody when it's just as nice as the sheet metal.

The dude who did it, only charged me $450... and he sanded the entire frame down, and all of the parts, etc... and then painted it. I think it took him a total of about 14 hours... but being he's a friend, he cut the labor out a lot. He's also the one who's gonna help me start learning to paint. Who knows, I might do side work for him one day if I get good.
That's nice, I wish I had done that earlier on mine.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-03-2009, 01:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
4.2 and 4.3

well i have a 2002 ford f150 with the essex 4.2. i have 148,000 i always was told from mechanics its just broken in. its greats its a 5 speed, it takes a beating. well anyways my friend has the 4.3 vortec in a blazed with about the same millage. today on the way to school i had to pick him up, it died again. its dies once a week. idk about a race tho, i think he could take me off the line but i think the f150 would house him.

my truck is just a bottom line stock f150, but it has balls
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-03-2009, 08:26 PM
Technical Article Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle: 1998 Ford F-150
Posts: 4,115
Send a message via AIM to Raptor05121 Send a message via MSN to Raptor05121 Send a message via Yahoo to Raptor05121
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyjsmidt View Post
well i have a 2002 ford f150 with the essex 4.2. i have 148,000 i always was told from mechanics its just broken in. its greats its a 5 speed, it takes a beating. well anyways my friend has the 4.3 vortec in a blazed with about the same millage. today on the way to school i had to pick him up, it died again. its dies once a week. idk about a race tho, i think he could take me off the line but i think the f150 would house him.

my truck is just a bottom line stock f150, but it has balls
haha welcome newbie! man i remember when i made this thread. oh, the memories

to be honest, that blazer would probably walk you. the reason being weight. we have 175 rwhp on 4,500 lbs of steel. hes walking on 160 rwhp with about 3,800-3,900 lbs. with some mods you can tie or even beat him! but dont street race, ive personally seen a lot of bad accidents from it.

keep it on the track, kids!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-04-2009, 12:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburg, Texas
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F150
Posts: 2,102
Send a message via AIM to f150fella08
id have to say 4.2 or the dodge 3.7.

bringing this up, have and of yall noticed the 3.1 or 3.8 v6 in the impalas or the buick cars how horribly they start? gosh i hate GMs!

and yes the 4.0 SOHC ranger will scoot i had a 98 that would roll out
__________________
True Dual Straights, No Mufflers, H Pipe, Maggie Hi Flows (94106) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt6qpxghCwQ
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-04-2009, 02:01 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Haven il
Vehicle: 2008 ford f150
Posts: 90
Send a message via MSN to bobkyle2
i raced a 08 dodge 3.7 auto short bed in my 02 step side f150 auto 4.2..his was brand new 4800 miles...my 4.2 has 100k no tune up ...with a cai...he pulled on me the way till about 70-rev limiter..after that he kept pullin on me....haha i was sad...my 02 needs a tune up bad ...all original but the intake..so...dunno if that would have give me enough of a edge or not...wouldnt hurt though
__________________
2008 f150 xl auto..373ls..4.2..projecter healights..jdm tails..k&n..vert grill..17x9 pro comps..pioneer deck
2002 ford f150 4.2..3.55..16eagle alloys..flareside..cold air intake..projector headlights..black vertical grill
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-04-2009, 12:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2000 Ford F150 7700
Posts: 388
god this thread is old but all i know is that the dodge 3.7 is the slowest thing i have ever driven, what a POS
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-07-2009, 09:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F-150
Posts: 384
Send a message via AIM to BlueOval_Man
Race a Chevy 1500 4.3 is slower than a F-150 4.2, enough said. Although 4.3's can sound good.
__________________
2002 F-150 4.2V6 4x2
Performance:
X-Cal 2 - MAC Intake - DynoMax Exhaust - P&P Throttle Body - Bored .060 - 3.55LS

Appearance:
Procomp Lift Springs - Procomp ES3000 Shocks - 265/75/16 Dayton A/T's - Lift Shakels - ION Alloy 133's - 3/1 total lift

Audio:
JVC HU - Polk DB571's - Jensen Power 760 Amp (Mids and Highs) - Memphis SC 10" - RF Power Series Amp (Lows)

2004 F-150 Heritage - 4.6 - Slower than my V6 without a tune!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-09-2009, 11:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburg, Texas
Vehicle: 2002 Ford F150
Posts: 2,102
Send a message via AIM to f150fella08
are we talking about speed or power?

cuz the 3.7 hauls pretty good for a 6cyl , so does the 4.2
__________________
True Dual Straights, No Mufflers, H Pipe, Maggie Hi Flows (94106) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt6qpxghCwQ
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives