online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > Transmissions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-28-2008, 11:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 2005 chevy Z71
Posts: 24
C4 C6 questions...FMX

which is the stronger trans? Am I correct to asume that the C4 backed up pintos, small block Fords, 302 351, 400 and the c6 backed up the big block Fords?


And will early 80's four speed auto ( do'nt know the code name ) fit a early 70's windsor engine,, 351.

a side from the bell housing being larger or smaller betwean the c6 and a c4, can the guts be interchanged, and I have heard of a FMX version of the Ford auto, what dose a FMX mean?

I'm asking For a Ford Friend whith a 72 GranTorino ( being a Chevy Guy I know a hell of a lot more abought Fords Than he, ) that is cooked, but the body is mint.

All I need to do is paint it red with a white stripe and crash over garbage cans in back alley's...

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F150
Posts: 3,906
Send a message via ICQ to Klitch
well if my dad was home i'd ask him, i know he has all of those listed. what i do remember was the FMX was a heavier trans, took the abuse better from the 351C than his other auto's. think it was slower shifting though?
if you dont get a definate answer before i go to bed, i should be able to ask him what he knows.
__________________

built and blueprinted Lightning powerplant with p&p heads, race built 4r70w by Darrin @ BC-Automotive
Avoid Rods C.A.R.S. 3929 W Clearwater Ave, Kennewick, WA. screwed me on a bad transmission "built" by State Transmission of Pasco, Wa. avoid www.Engineworldusa.com, junk import motors.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2008, 04:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F150
Posts: 3,906
Send a message via ICQ to Klitch
ok heres what i found out from him.
C4, meant for small blocks, C6 meant for big blocks.
FMX was an older cast iron center section, mostly meant for pickups?
__________________

built and blueprinted Lightning powerplant with p&p heads, race built 4r70w by Darrin @ BC-Automotive
Avoid Rods C.A.R.S. 3929 W Clearwater Ave, Kennewick, WA. screwed me on a bad transmission "built" by State Transmission of Pasco, Wa. avoid www.Engineworldusa.com, junk import motors.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: mass.
Vehicle: 2001 ford 250
Posts: 1,955
i hear the c6 is one of the best trannys ford ever made.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:31 PM
glc glc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Vehicle: 2003 Ford F150
Posts: 9,211
The C4 is a medium duty trans, the C6 is heavy duty. The FMX is old technology based on the original "Cruise-o-Matic" which is a Borg-Warner design. I would say its strength is somewhere between the C4 and C6.

The early 80's overdrive was the AOD, which was based on the FMX.
__________________
2003 F150XL 4.2 short cab/bed 4x2 5 speed manual 3.55 LS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:45 PM
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Fort Worth, TX
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 11,631
There was/is a small block C6. It bolts to the smaller bell housing same as a C4 but the transmission itself is larger and heavier. I ran a 351 C in a 54 Ford drag truck for several years and the best transmission I had was a beefed up C4. You can make them as strong as the C6. I ran a small block C6 for awhile and was just never happy with it. The FMX will bolt up to the small block, but as stated it is less desirable. If I remember correctly, it has a cast iron housing rather than aluminum.
__________________
Jim

Flowmaster 40, K&N dropin, Tint, Roush wheels, 305/50/20s
Edge Evo with PHP custom tunes, GF 2" shackles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F150
Posts: 3,906
Send a message via ICQ to Klitch
bluejay, yeah FMX is a heavy pig, cast iron housing.
__________________

built and blueprinted Lightning powerplant with p&p heads, race built 4r70w by Darrin @ BC-Automotive
Avoid Rods C.A.R.S. 3929 W Clearwater Ave, Kennewick, WA. screwed me on a bad transmission "built" by State Transmission of Pasco, Wa. avoid www.Engineworldusa.com, junk import motors.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:27 PM
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Fort Worth, TX
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 11,631
Wow, it's been nearly 18 or so years since I'v thought about any of this stuff, but if memory serves correctly, the small block C6s came behind the 351Ms and the 400s.
__________________
Jim

Flowmaster 40, K&N dropin, Tint, Roush wheels, 305/50/20s
Edge Evo with PHP custom tunes, GF 2" shackles
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F-150
Posts: 170
For most applications I'd pick a well built c4 over a c6. A decent c4 can hold almost as much power as a stock c6 but it has 1 major advantage, it doesn't waste nearly as much power. My numbers are prolly off but IIRC the c4 uses something like 25-40 hp, and a c6 is in the neighborhood of 60-75hp. That's a hell of alot of power wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:34 PM
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Fort Worth, TX
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 11,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock Krusher View Post
For most applications I'd pick a well built c4 over a c6. A decent c4 can hold almost as much power as a stock c6 but it has 1 major advantage, it doesn't waste nearly as much power. My numbers are prolly off but IIRC the c4 uses something like 25-40 hp, and a c6 is in the neighborhood of 60-75hp. That's a hell of alot of power wasted.
Yep, and I assure you, it's noticeable when racing. I loved that little C4. Also, it is so much easier to handle when you have to remove it or stab it. After we built it up, it lasted 3 years of racing, in a heavy truck body, with about 375 HP plus 150 HP nitrous, 4.88 gears, slicks, and a 2400 stall converter. I'm talking nearly every weekend.
__________________
Jim

Flowmaster 40, K&N dropin, Tint, Roush wheels, 305/50/20s
Edge Evo with PHP custom tunes, GF 2" shackles
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-30-2008, 04:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Vehicle: 1993 Ford F-150 4x4
Posts: 11
Had a '70 Mach 1 w/ 351C 4V with FMX. Shifted HARD. Barked 2nd consistently,
occasionally 3rd. Downshifted RIGHT NOW. GLC is correct. Old B-W unit. Ate 2nd gear servos,though. Wished every car I had since then shifted like that.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives